Detailed Infantility Test (DIT)

Understand how a teen’s behavior aligns with their age in about 10 minutes. Based on 53 real world observations, it pinpoints immature traits to guide targeted support.

Start Online Test

Questions: 5310 minutes

Hi! My name is Freudly, i am an AI therapist, I will give you an interpretation of the test after you complete it.

08:30

October 2, 2025

October 2, 2025
Material has been updated

October 2, 2025
Material has been published

23318 views

2779 completions

2205 likes

Scale Explorer

How the Scales are Structured

example score

16/53

Infantility (I)

Assesses the intensity of childish (infantile) personality traits as observed in real-life behavior.

Within normative range

Borderline

Infantilism (mild to pronounced)

0 – 8: Within normative range | 9 – 17: Borderline | 18 – 53: Infantilism (mild to pronounced)

A score of 16 falls in the borderline range, suggesting occasional or situational childish traits that are noticeable but not clearly elevated.

Start Online Test

just completed the test

DATA-BASED USER COHORTS

Who Usually Takes This Test?

Teachers and Homeroom Advisors

46%OF USERS

They use it to quickly gauge whether a student’s everyday behavior matches their age and to plan classroom support.

School Psychologists and Counselors

34%OF USERS

They complete it to identify immature behavior patterns and choose targeted interventions or referrals.

Youth Program Educators

20%OF USERS

They rely on it after observing teens in group activities to understand social maturity and adjust coaching approaches.

BASED ON AGGREGATED, ANONYMIZED DATA FROM TENS OF THOUSANDS OF FREUDLY USERS.

RESULTS YOU CAN ACTUALLY USE

What You’ll See After You Finish the Test

Scale Results
— Explained Clearly

Your scores across each test scale, translated into plain, usable insights. Not just numbers, but what they actually mean for your daily life, emotional state, and overall well-being.

AI-Powered
Interpretation

A structured, clinically grounded explanation. Our AI analyzes patterns and relationships between scales to provide a coherent interpretation — without alarmist language.

Statistical
Comparison

See how you compare to others. Your scores are placed in a statistical context, showing percentiles and trends based on anonymized platform data to help you understand what`s typical.

Practical
Recommendations

Actionable guidance tailored to your profile. Receive clear, realistic suggestions you can apply immediately — focused on coping, self-regulation, and realistic next steps.

AI-Detected
Insights

Key patterns you might not notice on your own. Surfacing subtle connections in your responses that help you better understand what may be driving your current results.

Discuss with
an AI Psychologist

Clarify, reflect, and explore right away. Talk through your outcomes, ask questions, and explore meanings in a calm, non-diagnostic dialogue environment.

Start Online Test

Used in 52+ countries

Benchmarking

See How You Compare

Once you finish the test, your results will be compared with real-world data from people in your country.
Below is a preview of the benchmarks we use to place your score in context.

Infantilism (I)

Average

20.1

Normal range

12.1 — 28.2

min.

max.

majority

This curve shows how scores are typically distributed.
Once you complete the test, your result will appear here so you can see where you land.

Start Online Test

Featured On

Rated 4.8/5 by Our Customers

“Freudly really helped me discover parts of my personality I hadn’t noticed before. It strengthened the areas where I needed to grow and made me feel more grounded and confident in the parts that already worked well.”

— Emma C., US

“I wanted to understand how serious my ADHD is, and now I finally do. I also realized I need to work on my self-esteem. It has been low for a long time, and that makes daily life harder than it should be.”

— Mateo R., CA

“Reading each question felt like someone really understood me. Even though I’ve already dealt with much of this, reflecting still helped me learn something new about myself.”

— Caroline F., US

“The process is simple. The test covers everything you need, and you’ll get a clear breakdown of your results. For just a few dollars, it’s a great value.”

— Klara N., CZ

“I kept thinking there might be a small chance, but now I know for sure. The questions were easy to understand, and the whole process was straightforward.”

— Bruno M., BR

“I really enjoyed this experience. I learned a lot, and it helped me make sense of my thoughts and the feeling I’ve had for a long time that I may have grown up with undiagnosed ADHD.”

— Alice B., FR

“Great platform — the insights were genuinely meaningful!”

— Daniel W., DE

“Everything was easy to follow. The tools you get at the end are genuinely helpful for self-growth, and the price is very reasonable. I really appreciate that.”

— Sofia M., ES

“Surprisingly accurate — honestly didn’t expect it to nail things so well.”

— Adir B., IL

“There are lots of different tests to pick from, and the price is surprisingly low for how much insight you get.”

— Olivia W., CA

“I was pleasantly surprised when I read the results. It was as if someone had sorted out my messy thoughts and given me useful tips to help me speak with more confidence.”

— Grace O., IE

“It was really solid, very detailed, and it actually helped me make sense of a lot of things.”

— Carla T., TT

“I was really impressed with the report. It was clear, thoughtful, and it reflected things I’ve been noticing about myself.”

— Jade H., US

“The questions made me think deeply and helped me become more self-aware.”

— Brooke S., US

“Reading through most of the questions made me feel understood. Although I’ve already worked through some of these issues, the questions still gave me useful insights and helped me learn more about myself.”

— Ryan M., US

“I usually take one or two tests each month, and this has become a good way for me to see how I’m doing.”

— Lucas W., US

“Most of the time, my results are in the 90 to 98th percentile compared to others. It really makes me feel like there’s something unique about me.”

— Ethan C., US

“I tried out some of the AI’s suggestions, and to be honest, they worked much better than I thought they would. Maybe this thing really is smarter than me.”

— Reece D., AU

Trusted by 22k+ Users Worldwide

CLEAR ANSWERS TO COMMON QUESTIONS

Frequently Asked Questions

Any questions left?

What does this questionnaire measure?

It estimates the extent to which a teenager shows immature behavior in everyday situations. It highlights areas where functioning may not match age expectations.

Who should complete the questionnaire?

It should be completed by an adult who has consistent, direct observations of the teenager across settings. Self-report is not recommended.

What observation period is required before rating items?

Ratings should be based on repeated observations over time, not on a single incident. If an item cannot be observed, select the option that indicates insufficient information.

How long does it take, and how many items are included?

Completion time is approximately 10 minutes. The questionnaire includes 53 items.

How should results be used?

Results support screening and intervention planning by identifying patterns of immature behavior. They should be interpreted alongside other information and not used as the sole basis for high-stakes decisions.

WHAT THE TEST MEASURES

About This Assessment

Detailed Infantility Test (DIT)

infantilism

This observer-rated questionnaire is designed to screen for developmentally immature (infantile) behavior patterns in adolescents across everyday contexts. The Detailed Infantility Test (DIT) is intended for completion by an adult who knows the youth well (e.g., teacher or other consistent observer) and can rate behavior based on repeated, real-world observation.

The measure contains 53 items and typically takes about 10 minutes to complete. Scores from the Detailed Infantility Test (DIT) may be used to support clinical formulation and to identify domains where immature behavior is more prominent, informing monitoring and intervention planning; it should be interpreted within the broader assessment context. Erik H. Erikson is cited as the author.

Author: Erik H. Erikson

Literature: Arnett, J. J. Emerging adulthood: The winding road from the late teens through the twenties. Oxford University Press. 2004.

Test Question Form