Treatment Adherence Scale Test

Learn how likely someone is to follow medical advice and stay on treatment in about 13 minutes. Use results to spot motivation gaps, improve clinician communication, and plan support that sticks.

Start Online Test

Questions: 6613 minutes

Hi! My name is Freudly, i am an AI therapist, I will give you an interpretation of the test after you complete it.

08:30

October 2, 2025

October 2, 2025
Material has been updated

October 2, 2025
Material has been published

29884 views

1831 completion

1600 likes

Scale Explorer

How the Scales are Structured

example score

32/44

Behavioral (B)

Behavioral compliance measures how consistently a person tends to follow medical recommendations and treatment routines in everyday behavior.

Low

Moderate

High

0 – 15: Low | 16 – 29: Moderate | 30 – 44: High

A score of 32 falls in the High range, indicating a generally strong tendency to adhere to medical instructions and follow the treatment regimen.

example score

21/44

Emotional (E)

Measures how much a person’s adherence to medical advice is driven by emotional sensitivity and impressionability.

Low

Average

High

0 – 15: Low | 16 – 29: Average | 30 – 44: High

A score of 21 falls in the Average range, suggesting adherence may fluctuate with mood and current impressions and the importance of the illness may sometimes be underestimated.

example score

33/44

Social (S)

Measures the tendency to follow medical recommendations primarily to gain or maintain social approval.

Low

Moderate

High

0 – 15: Low | 16 – 29: Moderate | 30 – 44: High

A score of 33 indicates a high level of social compliance, meaning adherence to recommendations is more likely when social approval or expectations are salient.

example score

52/132

Overall Adherence (OA)

This scale measures how consistently a person tends to follow medical recommendations and adhere to a prescribed treatment plan.

Low compliance

Moderate compliance

High compliance

0 – 40: Low compliance | 41 – 80: Moderate compliance | 81 – 132: High compliance

A score of 52 indicates moderate compliance, suggesting a situational and sometimes uncertain approach to treatment adherence with possible doubts about the need for therapy.

Start Online Test

just completed the test

DATA-BASED USER COHORTS

Who Usually Takes This Test?

Chronic condition patients

41%OF USERS

People managing long-term illnesses take it to see how likely they are to follow treatment plans, medication schedules, and regular check-ins.

Caregivers and family members

34%OF USERS

Those supporting a relative’s care use it to understand adherence barriers and how to encourage consistent follow-through.

Health-conscious self-checkers

25%OF USERS

Generally healthy people take it to gauge whether they tend to stick with medical advice, prevention steps, and lifestyle changes.

BASED ON AGGREGATED, ANONYMIZED DATA FROM TENS OF THOUSANDS OF FREUDLY USERS.

RESULTS YOU CAN ACTUALLY USE

What You’ll See After You Finish the Test

Scale Results
— Explained Clearly

Your scores across each test scale, translated into plain, usable insights. Not just numbers, but what they actually mean for your daily life, emotional state, and overall well-being.

AI-Powered
Interpretation

A structured, clinically grounded explanation. Our AI analyzes patterns and relationships between scales to provide a coherent interpretation — without alarmist language.

Statistical
Comparison

See how you compare to others. Your scores are placed in a statistical context, showing percentiles and trends based on anonymized platform data to help you understand what`s typical.

Practical
Recommendations

Actionable guidance tailored to your profile. Receive clear, realistic suggestions you can apply immediately — focused on coping, self-regulation, and realistic next steps.

AI-Detected
Insights

Key patterns you might not notice on your own. Surfacing subtle connections in your responses that help you better understand what may be driving your current results.

Discuss with
an AI Psychologist

Clarify, reflect, and explore right away. Talk through your outcomes, ask questions, and explore meanings in a calm, non-diagnostic dialogue environment.

Start Online Test

Used in 52+ countries

Benchmarking

See How You Compare

Once you finish the test, your results will be compared with real-world data from people in your country.
Below is a preview of the benchmarks we use to place your score in context.

Behavioral (B)

Average

13.1

Normal range

7 — 19.1

min.

max.

majority

This curve shows how scores are typically distributed.
Once you complete the test, your result will appear here so you can see where you land.

Emotional (E)

Average

16.4

Normal range

8.3 — 24.6

min.

max.

majority

This curve shows how scores are typically distributed.
Once you complete the test, your result will appear here so you can see where you land.

Social (S)

Average

31.1

Normal range

25.7 — 36.6

min.

max.

majority

This curve shows how scores are typically distributed.
Once you complete the test, your result will appear here so you can see where you land.

Overall Compliance (OC)

Average

92.7

Normal range

76.5 — 108.9

min.

max.

132

majority

This curve shows how scores are typically distributed.
Once you complete the test, your result will appear here so you can see where you land.

Start Online Test

Featured On

Rated 4.8/5 by Our Customers

“Freudly really helped me discover parts of my personality I hadn’t noticed before. It strengthened the areas where I needed to grow and made me feel more grounded and confident in the parts that already worked well.”

— Emma C., US

“I wanted to understand how serious my ADHD is, and now I finally do. I also realized I need to work on my self-esteem. It has been low for a long time, and that makes daily life harder than it should be.”

— Mateo R., CA

“Reading each question felt like someone really understood me. Even though I’ve already dealt with much of this, reflecting still helped me learn something new about myself.”

— Caroline F., US

“The process is simple. The test covers everything you need, and you’ll get a clear breakdown of your results. For just a few dollars, it’s a great value.”

— Klara N., CZ

“I kept thinking there might be a small chance, but now I know for sure. The questions were easy to understand, and the whole process was straightforward.”

— Bruno M., BR

“I really enjoyed this experience. I learned a lot, and it helped me make sense of my thoughts and the feeling I’ve had for a long time that I may have grown up with undiagnosed ADHD.”

— Alice B., FR

“Great platform — the insights were genuinely meaningful!”

— Daniel W., DE

“Everything was easy to follow. The tools you get at the end are genuinely helpful for self-growth, and the price is very reasonable. I really appreciate that.”

— Sofia M., ES

“Surprisingly accurate — honestly didn’t expect it to nail things so well.”

— Adir B., IL

“There are lots of different tests to pick from, and the price is surprisingly low for how much insight you get.”

— Olivia W., CA

“I was pleasantly surprised when I read the results. It was as if someone had sorted out my messy thoughts and given me useful tips to help me speak with more confidence.”

— Grace O., IE

“It was really solid, very detailed, and it actually helped me make sense of a lot of things.”

— Carla T., TT

“I was really impressed with the report. It was clear, thoughtful, and it reflected things I’ve been noticing about myself.”

— Jade H., US

“The questions made me think deeply and helped me become more self-aware.”

— Brooke S., US

“Reading through most of the questions made me feel understood. Although I’ve already worked through some of these issues, the questions still gave me useful insights and helped me learn more about myself.”

— Ryan M., US

“I usually take one or two tests each month, and this has become a good way for me to see how I’m doing.”

— Lucas W., US

“Most of the time, my results are in the 90 to 98th percentile compared to others. It really makes me feel like there’s something unique about me.”

— Ethan C., US

“I tried out some of the AI’s suggestions, and to be honest, they worked much better than I thought they would. Maybe this thing really is smarter than me.”

— Reece D., AU

Trusted by 22k+ Users Worldwide

CLEAR ANSWERS TO COMMON QUESTIONS

Frequently Asked Questions

Any questions left?

What does this assessment measure?

It estimates readiness to follow medical recommendations, maintain a treatment schedule, and communicate with a clinician as directed.

Who is this assessment intended for?

It can be used with people managing chronic conditions that require ongoing care and with generally healthy individuals when adherence tendencies need to be screened.

How long does it take and how many items are included?

Estimated completion time is about 13 minutes. The questionnaire contains 66 items.

How should responses be selected?

Choose the option that best reflects typical behavior in treatment-related situations. Answer all items and avoid overthinking individual questions.

How should results be interpreted?

Results are used to identify possible barriers to following a regimen and areas where added support may improve adherence. Some items may not align perfectly with their scales in this online version, so results should be reviewed and verified by a qualified specialist.

WHAT THE TEST MEASURES

About This Assessment

Treatment Adherence Scale Test

compliance

This measure is designed to evaluate a respondent’s self-reported likelihood of following medical recommendations and maintaining engagement with prescribed care. The Treatment Adherence Scale provides a structured way to identify attitudes and behavioral tendencies that may support or interfere with adherence.

The instrument includes 66 items and typically takes about 13 minutes to complete. It is intended to support clinical formulation and treatment planning by highlighting potential motivational barriers, communication challenges, or routine-related factors that could affect adherence. When interpreted in context, the Treatment Adherence Scale may help guide targeted patient education, collaborative problem-solving, and appropriate follow-up.

Koop is cited as the author. Results should be considered alongside clinical interview data, health status, and contextual factors, and are not a substitute for clinical judgment.

Author: C. Everett Koop

Literature: Cialdini, R. B. Influence: Science and practice. Allyn & Bacon. 2009.

Test Question Form