Productivity Style Assessment Test

In 6 minutes, learn how you best organize work and share ideas. Get a clear profile to boost focus, tailor habits, and collaborate with less friction.
Start Online Test
Questions286 minutes
Hi! My name is Freudly, i am an AI therapist, I will give you an interpretation of the test after you complete it.
08:30
October 2, 2025
October 2, 2025
Material has been updated
27388 views
3292 completions
2863 likes
Share
Scale Explorer
How the Scales are Structured
example score
55/100
Your Productivity Style (YPS)
This scale measures how well your current work environment and communication habits align with your preferred productivity style.
Low alignment
Moderate alignment
High alignment
033Low alignment3466Moderate alignment67100High alignment
A score of 55 indicates moderate alignment, suggesting your routines and communication methods support your productivity style in some situations but may benefit from a few targeted adjustments.
Start Online Test
just completed the test
DATA-BASED USER COHORTS
Who Usually Takes This Test?
Busy knowledge workers
41%OF USERS
People juggling multiple projects who want to learn how they process information best and set up a workflow that feels easier and more focused.
Managers and team leads
34%OF USERS
Leaders looking to understand their own communication habits and adapt how they share ideas and delegate work across different personalities.
Students and career switchers
25%OF USERS
People building new study or work routines who want a quick profile to choose learning and collaboration methods that match their natural style.
BASED ON AGGREGATED, ANONYMIZED DATA FROM TENS OF THOUSANDS OF FREUDLY USERS.
RESULTS YOU CAN ACTUALLY USE
What You’ll See After You Finish the Test
Scale Results
— Explained Clearly
Your scores across each test scale, translated into plain, usable insights. Not just numbers, but what they actually mean for your daily life, emotional state, and overall well-being.
AI-Powered
Interpretation
A structured, clinically grounded explanation. Our AI analyzes patterns and relationships between scales to provide a coherent interpretation — without alarmist language.
Statistical
Comparison
See how you compare to others. Your scores are placed in a statistical context, showing percentiles and trends based on anonymized platform data to help you understand what`s typical.
Practical
Recommendations
Actionable guidance tailored to your profile. Receive clear, realistic suggestions you can apply immediately — focused on coping, self-regulation, and realistic next steps.
AI-Detected
Insights
Key patterns you might not notice on your own. Surfacing subtle connections in your responses that help you better understand what may be driving your current results.
Discuss with
an AI Psychologist
Clarify, reflect, and explore right away. Talk through your outcomes, ask questions, and explore meanings in a calm, non-diagnostic dialogue environment.
Start Online Test
Used in 52+ countries
Benchmarking
See How You Compare
Once you finish the test, your results will be compared with real-world data from people in your country.
Below is a preview of the benchmarks we use to place your score in context.
Your productivity style (Yps)
Average
45.8
Normal range
27.564.1
min.
0
max.
100
majority
This curve shows how scores are typically distributed.
Once you complete the test, your result will appear here so you can see where you land.
Featured On
Rated 4.8/5 by Our Customers
Freudly really helped me discover parts of my personality I hadn’t noticed before. It strengthened the areas where I needed to grow and made me feel more grounded and confident in the parts that already worked well.
Emma C., US
I wanted to understand how serious my ADHD is, and now I finally do. I also realized I need to work on my self-esteem. It has been low for a long time, and that makes daily life harder than it should be.
Mateo R., CA
Reading each question felt like someone really understood me. Even though I’ve already dealt with much of this, reflecting still helped me learn something new about myself.
Caroline F., US
The process is simple. The test covers everything you need, and you’ll get a clear breakdown of your results. For just a few dollars, it’s a great value.
Klara N., CZ
I kept thinking there might be a small chance, but now I know for sure. The questions were easy to understand, and the whole process was straightforward.
Bruno M., BR
I really enjoyed this experience. I learned a lot, and it helped me make sense of my thoughts and the feeling I’ve had for a long time that I may have grown up with undiagnosed ADHD.
Alice B., FR
Great platform — the insights were genuinely meaningful!
Daniel W., DE
Everything was easy to follow. The tools you get at the end are genuinely helpful for self-growth, and the price is very reasonable. I really appreciate that.
Sofia M., ES
Surprisingly accurate — honestly didn’t expect it to nail things so well.
Adir B., IL
There are lots of different tests to pick from, and the price is surprisingly low for how much insight you get.
Olivia W., CA
I was pleasantly surprised when I read the results. It was as if someone had sorted out my messy thoughts and given me useful tips to help me speak with more confidence.
Grace O., IE
It was really solid, very detailed, and it actually helped me make sense of a lot of things.
Carla T., TT
I was really impressed with the report. It was clear, thoughtful, and it reflected things I’ve been noticing about myself.
Jade H., US
The questions made me think deeply and helped me become more self-aware.
Brooke S., US
Reading through most of the questions made me feel understood. Although I’ve already worked through some of these issues, the questions still gave me useful insights and helped me learn more about myself.
Ryan M., US
I usually take one or two tests each month, and this has become a good way for me to see how I’m doing.
Lucas W., US
Most of the time, my results are in the 90 to 98th percentile compared to others. It really makes me feel like there’s something unique about me.
Ethan C., US
I tried out some of the AI’s suggestions, and to be honest, they worked much better than I thought they would. Maybe this thing really is smarter than me.
Reece D., AU
Trusted by 22k+ Users Worldwide
CLEAR ANSWERS TO COMMON QUESTIONS
Frequently Asked Questions

Any questions left?

What does this assessment measure?
It identifies preferred patterns for organizing work, processing information, and exchanging ideas. Results describe conditions that support focus and sustained effort.
How long does it take, and how many items are included?
Estimated completion time is about 6 minutes. It includes 28 questions.
Are there right or wrong answers?
No. Items are designed to capture typical preferences rather than evaluate performance.
How should responses be selected?
Choose the option that best reflects usual behavior across most situations. Avoid selecting answers based only on an ideal or occasional scenario.
How can the results be used in practice?
They can guide adjustments to work routines, task planning, and communication methods. They can also support clearer collaboration by clarifying preferred ways of sharing and receiving information.
WHAT THE TEST MEASURES
About This Assessment
Your Productivity Style Test

Productivity Style Assessment Test

This measure is designed to help individuals clarify how they tend to organize thinking and work processes, with attention to preferred approaches to communication and idea exchange. The Productivity Style Assessment is intended to identify patterns in how a person processes information, engages with tasks, and experiences different work conditions.

The instrument includes 28 items and typically takes about 6 minutes to complete. Items are framed to describe typical preferences rather than right or wrong answers, and results are commonly used to support self-reflection and practical planning.

Interpretation from the Productivity Style Assessment can inform selection of work strategies, structuring of daily routines, and adjustments in collaboration or communication style. Findings should be considered descriptive and context-dependent, and are best integrated with other sources of information when used in coaching, workplace consultation, or related applied settings.

Author: edwin-a-locke, gary-p-latham
Literature: Locke, E. A., & Latham, G. P. A theory of goal setting and task performance. Prentice Hall. 1990.
Test Question Form
You Might Also Like
Reproductive Motives Questionnaire
This brief self-report measure assesses motivations related to reproduction…
Start Test
Comments
Leave a Comment