Thinking Profile Test

Understand how you take in and process information across key thinking styles in about 14 minutes. Get clear, visual results from 75 items to spot strengths, creativity, and growth areas for school or work.
Start Online Test
Questions7514 minutes
Hi! My name is Freudly, i am an AI therapist, I will give you an interpretation of the test after you complete it.
08:30
October 2, 2025
October 2, 2025
Material has been updated
19797 views
1046 completions
924 likes
Share
Scale Explorer
How the Scales are Structured
example score
6/15
Creativity (C)
Creativity measures the tendency to use original, unconventional approaches and generate unique solutions or products.
Low
Moderate
High
05Low69Moderate1015High
A score of 6 falls in the Moderate range, suggesting a generally conventional style with some readiness to try novel ideas when the situation supports it.
example score
6/15
Visual-Imaginative Thinking (VT)
Measures how effectively a person can manipulate mental images from memory or imagination to support creative problem-solving.
Low
Average
High
05Low69Average1015High
A score of 6 falls in the Average range, suggesting a functional ability to work with mental images that may be applied in creative tasks with some effort.
example score
2/15
Symbolic Thinking (ST)
Measures how readily a person reasons using abstract signs and concepts rather than relying on concrete objects or images.
Low
Moderate
High
05Low69Moderate1015High
A score of 2 indicates low sign-based thinking, suggesting the person may rely more on concrete or visual information than on abstract concepts and verbal reasoning in similar tasks.
example score
7/15
Symbolic Thinking (ST)
Measures how effectively a person transforms information using symbols, numbers, and formal rules of inference to produce formula-like or program-like solutions.
Low
Moderate
High
05Low69Moderate1015High
A score of 7 falls in the Moderate range, suggesting an average ability to work with symbols and formal rules when solving problems.
example score
10/15
Object-Based Thinking (OT)
Measures the tendency to process information through real objects and hands-on, step-by-step actions to produce practical outcomes.
Lower
Moderate
Higher
06Lower79Moderate1015Higher
A score of 10 indicates a higher level of concrete thinking, suggesting a preference for practical, sequential problem-solving with tangible materials or actions.
Start Online Test
just completed the test
DATA-BASED USER COHORTS
Who Usually Takes This Test?
HR and Talent Teams
41%OF USERS
Use it to map candidates’ and employees’ thinking styles for role fit, training needs, and development planning.
Psychologists and Coaches
34%OF USERS
Take it to quickly build a clear profile of strengths across different thinking modes and guide targeted improvement.
Teachers and School Counselors
25%OF USERS
Use the school-friendly version to understand how a student processes information and choose better learning approaches.
BASED ON AGGREGATED, ANONYMIZED DATA FROM TENS OF THOUSANDS OF FREUDLY USERS.
RESULTS YOU CAN ACTUALLY USE
What You’ll See After You Finish the Test
Scale Results
— Explained Clearly
Your scores across each test scale, translated into plain, usable insights. Not just numbers, but what they actually mean for your daily life, emotional state, and overall well-being.
AI-Powered
Interpretation
A structured, clinically grounded explanation. Our AI analyzes patterns and relationships between scales to provide a coherent interpretation — without alarmist language.
Statistical
Comparison
See how you compare to others. Your scores are placed in a statistical context, showing percentiles and trends based on anonymized platform data to help you understand what`s typical.
Practical
Recommendations
Actionable guidance tailored to your profile. Receive clear, realistic suggestions you can apply immediately — focused on coping, self-regulation, and realistic next steps.
AI-Detected
Insights
Key patterns you might not notice on your own. Surfacing subtle connections in your responses that help you better understand what may be driving your current results.
Discuss with
an AI Psychologist
Clarify, reflect, and explore right away. Talk through your outcomes, ask questions, and explore meanings in a calm, non-diagnostic dialogue environment.
Start Online Test
Used in 52+ countries
Benchmarking
See How You Compare
Once you finish the test, your results will be compared with real-world data from people in your country.
Below is a preview of the benchmarks we use to place your score in context.
Creativity (C)
Average
8.2
Normal range
6.110.4
min.
0
max.
15
majority
This curve shows how scores are typically distributed.
Once you complete the test, your result will appear here so you can see where you land.
Figurative Thinking (FT)
Average
8.9
Normal range
7.110.8
min.
0
max.
15
majority
This curve shows how scores are typically distributed.
Once you complete the test, your result will appear here so you can see where you land.
Sign-based Thinking (ST)
Average
9.9
Normal range
7.412.5
min.
0
max.
15
majority
This curve shows how scores are typically distributed.
Once you complete the test, your result will appear here so you can see where you land.
Symbolic Thinking (ST)
Average
7.8
Normal range
5.510.2
min.
0
max.
15
majority
This curve shows how scores are typically distributed.
Once you complete the test, your result will appear here so you can see where you land.
Concrete Thinking (CT)
Average
8.8
Normal range
6.611
min.
0
max.
15
majority
This curve shows how scores are typically distributed.
Once you complete the test, your result will appear here so you can see where you land.
Featured On
Rated 4.8/5 by Our Customers
Freudly really helped me discover parts of my personality I hadn’t noticed before. It strengthened the areas where I needed to grow and made me feel more grounded and confident in the parts that already worked well.
Emma C., US
I wanted to understand how serious my ADHD is, and now I finally do. I also realized I need to work on my self-esteem. It has been low for a long time, and that makes daily life harder than it should be.
Mateo R., CA
Reading each question felt like someone really understood me. Even though I’ve already dealt with much of this, reflecting still helped me learn something new about myself.
Caroline F., US
The process is simple. The test covers everything you need, and you’ll get a clear breakdown of your results. For just a few dollars, it’s a great value.
Klara N., CZ
I kept thinking there might be a small chance, but now I know for sure. The questions were easy to understand, and the whole process was straightforward.
Bruno M., BR
I really enjoyed this experience. I learned a lot, and it helped me make sense of my thoughts and the feeling I’ve had for a long time that I may have grown up with undiagnosed ADHD.
Alice B., FR
Great platform — the insights were genuinely meaningful!
Daniel W., DE
Everything was easy to follow. The tools you get at the end are genuinely helpful for self-growth, and the price is very reasonable. I really appreciate that.
Sofia M., ES
Surprisingly accurate — honestly didn’t expect it to nail things so well.
Adir B., IL
There are lots of different tests to pick from, and the price is surprisingly low for how much insight you get.
Olivia W., CA
I was pleasantly surprised when I read the results. It was as if someone had sorted out my messy thoughts and given me useful tips to help me speak with more confidence.
Grace O., IE
It was really solid, very detailed, and it actually helped me make sense of a lot of things.
Carla T., TT
I was really impressed with the report. It was clear, thoughtful, and it reflected things I’ve been noticing about myself.
Jade H., US
The questions made me think deeply and helped me become more self-aware.
Brooke S., US
Reading through most of the questions made me feel understood. Although I’ve already worked through some of these issues, the questions still gave me useful insights and helped me learn more about myself.
Ryan M., US
I usually take one or two tests each month, and this has become a good way for me to see how I’m doing.
Lucas W., US
Most of the time, my results are in the 90 to 98th percentile compared to others. It really makes me feel like there’s something unique about me.
Ethan C., US
I tried out some of the AI’s suggestions, and to be honest, they worked much better than I thought they would. Maybe this thing really is smarter than me.
Reece D., AU
Trusted by 22k+ Users Worldwide
CLEAR ANSWERS TO COMMON QUESTIONS
Frequently Asked Questions

Any questions left?

What does this assessment measure?
It measures how strongly different modes of thinking are developed: concrete, visual, sign-based, and symbolic. It also provides an indicator of creative problem solving.
How long does it take and how many items are included?
Estimated completion time is about 14 minutes. The assessment includes 75 items.
What types of tasks are included?
Tasks involve solving short problems that use objects, visual images, symbols, and signs. Items are designed to sample multiple ways of perceiving and processing information.
How should results be interpreted?
Scores describe relative strengths and weaker areas across the measured thinking modes. Results are intended to inform development planning and should be interpreted alongside other relevant information.
Is there a version suitable for school-age participants?
A shortened version is available for school-age participants. It reduces task load while keeping the same core measurement areas.
WHAT THE TEST MEASURES
About This Assessment
Thinking Profile Test

Thinking Profile Test

This measure is designed to characterize individual differences in cognitive processing and preferred modes of reasoning. Thinking Profile is a brief, structured set of tasks intended to sample performance across multiple representational formats relevant to everyday learning and problem solving.

The instrument contains 75 items and typically requires about 14 minutes to complete. Items emphasize problem solving with concrete content, visual imagery, and use of symbols and signs, with a focus on describing relative strengths across thinking approaches.

Thinking Profile may be used in educational, vocational, or clinical-adjunct contexts to inform discussion of learning strategies and skill development. Bibliographic attribution is commonly given to Robert J. Sternberg and Richard J. Davidson.

Author: Richard J. Davidson, Robert J. Sternberg
Literature: Kahneman, D. Thinking, fast and slow. Farrar, Straus and Giroux. 2011.
Test Question Form
You Might Also Like
Style of Learning and Thinking (SOLAT)
This measure is designed to describe individual preferences in information…
Start Test
Thinking Style Assessment
This self-report measure is designed to characterize an individual’s prefer…
Start Test
Relationship Feelings Profile
This measure is designed to characterize the emotional tone a person experi…
Start Test
Comments
Leave a Comment