Good and Evil Test

Understand how you see and judge moral qualities like good and evil in about 9 minutes. Get a quick, clear profile that supports counseling, education, and group work.
Start Online Test
Questions449 minutes
Hi! My name is Freudly, i am an AI therapist, I will give you an interpretation of the test after you complete it.
08:30
October 2, 2025
October 2, 2025
Material has been updated
29379 views
3100 completions
2691 likes
Share
Scale Explorer
How the Scales are Structured
example score
77/90
Good–Evil Index (GE) (GI()
The Good − Evil (GE) Index measures the balance between virtuous and malevolent personality traits, with higher scores indicating more virtuous predominance.
Malevolent traits prevail
Virtuous traits prevail
Strong virtuous predominance
-820Malevolent traits prevail160Virtuous traits prevail6190Strong virtuous predominance
A score of 77 falls in the “Strong virtuous predominance” range, indicating a pronounced tilt toward virtuous qualities over malevolent traits on this index.
example score
89/126
Evil (E)
Measures the intensity of malevolent traits such as vanity, cynicism, envy, and a tendency to disregard others' interests.
Low
Moderate
High
4269Low7087Moderate88126High
A score of 89 falls in the High range, suggesting a stronger-than-average expression of cynical, self-centered, and potentially aggressive interpersonal attitudes.
example score
100/132
Good (G)
Measures the strength of virtuous traits such as humility, responsibility, benevolence, and selfless concern for others.
Lower goodness
Moderate goodness
Higher goodness
4490Lower goodness91104Moderate goodness105132Higher goodness
A score of 100 falls in the Moderate goodness range, suggesting a generally prosocial and responsible orientation that is present but not consistently dominant across situations.
Start Online Test
just completed the test
DATA-BASED USER COHORTS
Who Usually Takes This Test?
Students exploring values
41%OF USERS
Teens and young adults take it to understand their moral beliefs, reactions to ethical dilemmas, and personal value priorities.
Counseling and coaching clients
34%OF USERS
People in therapy or counseling use it to spot where guilt, aggression, empathy, or fairness issues may be affecting decisions and relationships.
Educators and group leaders
25%OF USERS
Teachers, youth leaders, and trainers use it to quickly map group value dynamics and discuss moral development in a structured way.
BASED ON AGGREGATED, ANONYMIZED DATA FROM TENS OF THOUSANDS OF FREUDLY USERS.
RESULTS YOU CAN ACTUALLY USE
What You’ll See After You Finish the Test
Scale Results
— Explained Clearly
Your scores across each test scale, translated into plain, usable insights. Not just numbers, but what they actually mean for your daily life, emotional state, and overall well-being.
AI-Powered
Interpretation
A structured, clinically grounded explanation. Our AI analyzes patterns and relationships between scales to provide a coherent interpretation — without alarmist language.
Statistical
Comparison
See how you compare to others. Your scores are placed in a statistical context, showing percentiles and trends based on anonymized platform data to help you understand what`s typical.
Practical
Recommendations
Actionable guidance tailored to your profile. Receive clear, realistic suggestions you can apply immediately — focused on coping, self-regulation, and realistic next steps.
AI-Detected
Insights
Key patterns you might not notice on your own. Surfacing subtle connections in your responses that help you better understand what may be driving your current results.
Discuss with
an AI Psychologist
Clarify, reflect, and explore right away. Talk through your outcomes, ask questions, and explore meanings in a calm, non-diagnostic dialogue environment.
Start Online Test
Used in 52+ countries
Benchmarking
See How You Compare
Once you finish the test, your results will be compared with real-world data from people in your country.
Below is a preview of the benchmarks we use to place your score in context.
Good − Evil (GE) (G−E()
Average
-35.4
Normal range
-67.2-3.6
min.
-82
max.
90
majority
This curve shows how scores are typically distributed.
Once you complete the test, your result will appear here so you can see where you land.
Evil (E)
Average
78.2
Normal range
63.193.4
min.
42
max.
126
majority
This curve shows how scores are typically distributed.
Once you complete the test, your result will appear here so you can see where you land.
Hello (H)
Average
85.9
Normal range
71100.8
min.
44
max.
132
majority
This curve shows how scores are typically distributed.
Once you complete the test, your result will appear here so you can see where you land.
Featured On
Rated 4.8/5 by Our Customers
Freudly really helped me discover parts of my personality I hadn’t noticed before. It strengthened the areas where I needed to grow and made me feel more grounded and confident in the parts that already worked well.
Emma C., US
I wanted to understand how serious my ADHD is, and now I finally do. I also realized I need to work on my self-esteem. It has been low for a long time, and that makes daily life harder than it should be.
Mateo R., CA
Reading each question felt like someone really understood me. Even though I’ve already dealt with much of this, reflecting still helped me learn something new about myself.
Caroline F., US
The process is simple. The test covers everything you need, and you’ll get a clear breakdown of your results. For just a few dollars, it’s a great value.
Klara N., CZ
I kept thinking there might be a small chance, but now I know for sure. The questions were easy to understand, and the whole process was straightforward.
Bruno M., BR
I really enjoyed this experience. I learned a lot, and it helped me make sense of my thoughts and the feeling I’ve had for a long time that I may have grown up with undiagnosed ADHD.
Alice B., FR
Great platform — the insights were genuinely meaningful!
Daniel W., DE
Everything was easy to follow. The tools you get at the end are genuinely helpful for self-growth, and the price is very reasonable. I really appreciate that.
Sofia M., ES
Surprisingly accurate — honestly didn’t expect it to nail things so well.
Adir B., IL
There are lots of different tests to pick from, and the price is surprisingly low for how much insight you get.
Olivia W., CA
I was pleasantly surprised when I read the results. It was as if someone had sorted out my messy thoughts and given me useful tips to help me speak with more confidence.
Grace O., IE
It was really solid, very detailed, and it actually helped me make sense of a lot of things.
Carla T., TT
I was really impressed with the report. It was clear, thoughtful, and it reflected things I’ve been noticing about myself.
Jade H., US
The questions made me think deeply and helped me become more self-aware.
Brooke S., US
Reading through most of the questions made me feel understood. Although I’ve already worked through some of these issues, the questions still gave me useful insights and helped me learn more about myself.
Ryan M., US
I usually take one or two tests each month, and this has become a good way for me to see how I’m doing.
Lucas W., US
Most of the time, my results are in the 90 to 98th percentile compared to others. It really makes me feel like there’s something unique about me.
Ethan C., US
I tried out some of the AI’s suggestions, and to be honest, they worked much better than I thought they would. Maybe this thing really is smarter than me.
Reece D., AU
Trusted by 22k+ Users Worldwide
CLEAR ANSWERS TO COMMON QUESTIONS
Frequently Asked Questions

Any questions left?

What does this test measure?
It assesses how moral qualities associated with good and evil are perceived and evaluated. It provides a brief profile of ethical attitudes and value-related tendencies.
How long does it take and how many items are included?
Typical completion time is about 9 minutes. The questionnaire contains 44 items.
How should responses be given?
Answer each item based on the first response that seems accurate. Avoid overthinking and do not skip items.
How are results used in practice?
Results can support counseling and educational work by highlighting areas of ethical tension or inconsistency. They are also used to describe value dynamics in groups and moral development in adolescents.
Are different versions comparable?
Different versions use different norms and may differ in key markers, so scores should not be compared across versions. Interpretation should follow the norms and materials matched to the version administered.
WHAT THE TEST MEASURES
About This Assessment
Test Good and Evil, GE

Good and Evil Test

This self-report measure is designed to evaluate how individuals perceive and appraise moral qualities related to prosocial and antisocial orientations. The Good and Evil Test uses structured prompts to elicit attitudes and judgments relevant to ethical evaluation and moral self-concept.

The instrument contains 44 items and typically requires about 9 minutes to complete. It may be used in clinical, counseling, or educational settings to support discussion of value-based decision-making and potential areas of moral or ethical conflict, with results interpreted in the context of developmental level, cultural norms, and the broader assessment battery. Authorship is sometimes attributed to Lawrence Kohlberg and Jonathan Haidt; accordingly, the Good and Evil Test should be administered and interpreted with attention to the specific version in use and the availability of appropriate norms and scoring guidance.

Author: Jonathan Haidt, Lawrence Kohlberg
Literature: Haidt, J. The righteous mind: Why good people are divided by politics and religion. Pantheon Books. 2012.; Bandura, A. Moral disengagement: How people do harm and live with themselves. Worth Publishers. 2016.; Narvaez, D., & Lapsley, D. K. (Eds.). Personality, identity, and character: Explorations in moral psychology. Cambridge University Press. 2009.
Test Question Form
You Might Also Like
Good-Evil Test 2
This instrument is designed to assess how an individual endorses and expres…
Start Test
Comments
Leave a Comment