Managerial Business Communication Style Self-Assessment Questionnaire Test

Understand a manager’s communication style and rapport with the team in about 7 minutes. Compares self and team views to spot gaps, reduce conflict, and strengthen engagement.
Start Online Test
Questions387 minutes
Hi! My name is Freudly, i am an AI therapist, I will give you an interpretation of the test after you complete it.
08:30
October 2, 2025
October 2, 2025
Material has been updated
10181 view
963 completions
823 likes
Share
Scale Explorer
How the Scales are Structured
example score
20/39
Plenary (P)
Measures how strongly a manager prefers discussing business matters in a group or with the entire team (frontal communication).
Low
Moderate
High
1323Low2433Moderate3439High
A score of 20 falls in the Low range, suggesting a relatively weak tendency to use group-wide, frontal discussions as a primary communication approach.
example score
13/24
Formal-Dyadic (F)
Measures how strongly a manager relies on formal, businesslike communication within their close circle of subordinates.
Informal style
Situational formality
Pronounced formality
811Informal style1219Situational formality2024Pronounced formality
A score of 13 falls in the Situational formality range, suggesting the manager uses a mix of formal and informal communication depending on the context.
example score
22/39
Emotional Dyadic (ED)
Assesses a leader’s tendency to build close, emotionally supportive one-to-one relationships with subordinates.
Low warmth
Moderate warmth
High warmth
1323Low warmth2433Moderate warmth3439High warmth
A score of 22 falls in the Low warmth range, suggesting a more distant style with limited focus on subordinates’ emotional needs and interests.
example score
18/39
Overall Ability to Work With People (OAtWWP)
Measures a leader’s overall capability to interact effectively and respectfully with subordinates while considering their input and dignity.
Low
Average
High
1323Low2433Average3439High
A score of 18 falls in the Low range, suggesting notable difficulties in day-to-day interaction and people-management that may hinder team effectiveness.
Start Online Test
just completed the test
DATA-BASED USER COHORTS
Who Usually Takes This Test?
People managers and team leads
44%OF USERS
They take it to compare their self-view with team feedback and adjust how open or top-down their day-to-day communication feels.
HR and L&D specialists
33%OF USERS
They use it in leadership development or pulse checks to spot communication gaps that may affect morale, motivation, and conflict levels.
Project and cross-functional leaders
23%OF USERS
They take it to improve collaboration across roles by clarifying how their communication style is perceived in fast-moving coordination work.
BASED ON AGGREGATED, ANONYMIZED DATA FROM TENS OF THOUSANDS OF FREUDLY USERS.
RESULTS YOU CAN ACTUALLY USE
What You’ll See After You Finish the Test
Scale Results
— Explained Clearly
Your scores across each test scale, translated into plain, usable insights. Not just numbers, but what they actually mean for your daily life, emotional state, and overall well-being.
AI-Powered
Interpretation
A structured, clinically grounded explanation. Our AI analyzes patterns and relationships between scales to provide a coherent interpretation — without alarmist language.
Statistical
Comparison
See how you compare to others. Your scores are placed in a statistical context, showing percentiles and trends based on anonymized platform data to help you understand what`s typical.
Practical
Recommendations
Actionable guidance tailored to your profile. Receive clear, realistic suggestions you can apply immediately — focused on coping, self-regulation, and realistic next steps.
AI-Detected
Insights
Key patterns you might not notice on your own. Surfacing subtle connections in your responses that help you better understand what may be driving your current results.
Discuss with
an AI Psychologist
Clarify, reflect, and explore right away. Talk through your outcomes, ask questions, and explore meanings in a calm, non-diagnostic dialogue environment.
Start Online Test
Used in 52+ countries
Benchmarking
See How You Compare
Once you finish the test, your results will be compared with real-world data from people in your country.
Below is a preview of the benchmarks we use to place your score in context.
Frontal (F)
Average
20.2
Normal range
16.823.5
min.
13
max.
39
majority
This curve shows how scores are typically distributed.
Once you complete the test, your result will appear here so you can see where you land.
Officially dyadic (Od)
Average
15
Normal range
12.917
min.
8
max.
24
majority
This curve shows how scores are typically distributed.
Once you complete the test, your result will appear here so you can see where you land.
Emotional-Dyadic (E)
Average
23.9
Normal range
20.627.2
min.
13
max.
39
majority
This curve shows how scores are typically distributed.
Once you complete the test, your result will appear here so you can see where you land.
General ability to work with people (Gatwwp)
Average
23.4
Normal range
19.327.6
min.
13
max.
39
majority
This curve shows how scores are typically distributed.
Once you complete the test, your result will appear here so you can see where you land.
Featured On
Rated 4.8/5 by Our Customers
Freudly really helped me discover parts of my personality I hadn’t noticed before. It strengthened the areas where I needed to grow and made me feel more grounded and confident in the parts that already worked well.
Emma C., US
I wanted to understand how serious my ADHD is, and now I finally do. I also realized I need to work on my self-esteem. It has been low for a long time, and that makes daily life harder than it should be.
Mateo R., CA
Reading each question felt like someone really understood me. Even though I’ve already dealt with much of this, reflecting still helped me learn something new about myself.
Caroline F., US
The process is simple. The test covers everything you need, and you’ll get a clear breakdown of your results. For just a few dollars, it’s a great value.
Klara N., CZ
I kept thinking there might be a small chance, but now I know for sure. The questions were easy to understand, and the whole process was straightforward.
Bruno M., BR
I really enjoyed this experience. I learned a lot, and it helped me make sense of my thoughts and the feeling I’ve had for a long time that I may have grown up with undiagnosed ADHD.
Alice B., FR
Great platform — the insights were genuinely meaningful!
Daniel W., DE
Everything was easy to follow. The tools you get at the end are genuinely helpful for self-growth, and the price is very reasonable. I really appreciate that.
Sofia M., ES
Surprisingly accurate — honestly didn’t expect it to nail things so well.
Adir B., IL
There are lots of different tests to pick from, and the price is surprisingly low for how much insight you get.
Olivia W., CA
I was pleasantly surprised when I read the results. It was as if someone had sorted out my messy thoughts and given me useful tips to help me speak with more confidence.
Grace O., IE
It was really solid, very detailed, and it actually helped me make sense of a lot of things.
Carla T., TT
I was really impressed with the report. It was clear, thoughtful, and it reflected things I’ve been noticing about myself.
Jade H., US
The questions made me think deeply and helped me become more self-aware.
Brooke S., US
Reading through most of the questions made me feel understood. Although I’ve already worked through some of these issues, the questions still gave me useful insights and helped me learn more about myself.
Ryan M., US
I usually take one or two tests each month, and this has become a good way for me to see how I’m doing.
Lucas W., US
Most of the time, my results are in the 90 to 98th percentile compared to others. It really makes me feel like there’s something unique about me.
Ethan C., US
I tried out some of the AI’s suggestions, and to be honest, they worked much better than I thought they would. Maybe this thing really is smarter than me.
Reece D., AU
Trusted by 22k+ Users Worldwide
CLEAR ANSWERS TO COMMON QUESTIONS
Frequently Asked Questions

Any questions left?

What does this assessment measure?
It measures the manager’s typical business communication style, including the balance between open dialogue and formal top-down communication. It also indicates how rapport and feedback are handled in routine work interactions.
Who should complete the questionnaires?
One questionnaire is completed by the manager as a self-report. A separate questionnaire is completed by direct reports based on their observations of the manager’s communication.
How long does it take and how many items are included?
Completion time is about 7 minutes. The assessment includes 38 items.
How should responses be selected?
Select the option that best reflects typical behavior rather than rare events. If uncertain, choose the response that fits most situations.
How are results interpreted and used?
Results summarize the preferred communication model and compare self-ratings with subordinate ratings to identify alignment or gaps. Findings can guide targeted communication coaching and team process adjustments.
WHAT THE TEST MEASURES
About This Assessment

Managerial Business Communication Style Self-Assessment Questionnaire Test

This instrument is designed to clarify how a manager communicates with team members in day-to-day business interactions. The Managerial Business Communication Style Self-Assessment Questionnaire is intended to characterize preferred communication patterns, including the degree of openness in dialogue versus a more formal, directive approach.

It is structured to support comparison between self-perceived and observer-perceived communication style and may be used to identify areas of convergence or discrepancy that could inform feedback or coaching discussions. Administration typically involves 38 items and takes about 7 minutes. A bibliographic attribution has been associated with Robert R. McCrae and Paul T. Costa Jr.

Results from the Managerial Business Communication Style Self-Assessment Questionnaire should be interpreted in context and used as a descriptive aid rather than a standalone indicator of performance, with attention to organizational role demands and the specific team environment.

Author: Paul T. Costa Jr., Robert R. McCrae
Literature: Clampitt, P. G. Communicating for managerial effectiveness. SAGE Publications. 2010.
Test Question Form
You Might Also Like
Communication Style Assessment
This measure is designed to characterize an individual’s typical interperso…
Start Test
Business Communication Culture Assessment
The Business Communication Culture Assessment is a brief self-report measur…
Start Test
Comments
Leave a Comment