Misandry Scale Test

Understand how strongly a woman holds negative stereotypes about men in about 7 minutes. Fast 36 item snapshot for research or counseling to pinpoint bias patterns and guide next steps.

Start Online Test

Questions: 367 minutes

Hi! My name is Freudly, i am an AI therapist, I will give you an interpretation of the test after you complete it.

08:30

October 2, 2025

October 2, 2025
Material has been updated

October 2, 2025
Material has been published

24844 views

3004 completions

2363 likes

Scale Explorer

How the Scales are Structured

example score

40/100

Misandry (M)

Measures the intensity of negative stereotypes, distrust, and hostile attitudes toward men as a social group.

Low

Moderate

High

0 – 33: Low | 34 – 66: Moderate | 67 – 100: High

A score of 40 falls in the Moderate range, suggesting some negative beliefs about men are present but are not strongly pervasive.

Start Online Test

just completed the test

DATA-BASED USER COHORTS

Who Usually Takes This Test?

Gender bias researchers

41%OF USERS

Researchers and students use it to quantify women’s negative stereotypes about men for studies on gender attitudes and social prejudice.

Counselors and psychologists

34%OF USERS

Mental health professionals use it to screen for hostile or distrustful views toward men that may affect relationships and therapy goals.

Women seeking self-insight

25%OF USERS

Women take it to check whether frustration, suspicion, or resentment toward men has become a stable bias and how strongly it shows up right now.

BASED ON AGGREGATED, ANONYMIZED DATA FROM TENS OF THOUSANDS OF FREUDLY USERS.

RESULTS YOU CAN ACTUALLY USE

What You’ll See After You Finish the Test

Scale Results
— Explained Clearly

Your scores across each test scale, translated into plain, usable insights. Not just numbers, but what they actually mean for your daily life, emotional state, and overall well-being.

AI-Powered
Interpretation

A structured, clinically grounded explanation. Our AI analyzes patterns and relationships between scales to provide a coherent interpretation — without alarmist language.

Statistical
Comparison

See how you compare to others. Your scores are placed in a statistical context, showing percentiles and trends based on anonymized platform data to help you understand what`s typical.

Practical
Recommendations

Actionable guidance tailored to your profile. Receive clear, realistic suggestions you can apply immediately — focused on coping, self-regulation, and realistic next steps.

AI-Detected
Insights

Key patterns you might not notice on your own. Surfacing subtle connections in your responses that help you better understand what may be driving your current results.

Discuss with
an AI Psychologist

Clarify, reflect, and explore right away. Talk through your outcomes, ask questions, and explore meanings in a calm, non-diagnostic dialogue environment.

Start Online Test

Used in 52+ countries

Benchmarking

See How You Compare

Once you finish the test, your results will be compared with real-world data from people in your country.
Below is a preview of the benchmarks we use to place your score in context.

Misandry Measurement Scale (MMS)

Average

66.8

Normal range

52.7 — 80.9

min.

max.

100

majority

This curve shows how scores are typically distributed.
Once you complete the test, your result will appear here so you can see where you land.

Start Online Test

Featured On

Rated 4.8/5 by Our Customers

“Freudly really helped me discover parts of my personality I hadn’t noticed before. It strengthened the areas where I needed to grow and made me feel more grounded and confident in the parts that already worked well.”

— Emma C., US

“I wanted to understand how serious my ADHD is, and now I finally do. I also realized I need to work on my self-esteem. It has been low for a long time, and that makes daily life harder than it should be.”

— Mateo R., CA

“Reading each question felt like someone really understood me. Even though I’ve already dealt with much of this, reflecting still helped me learn something new about myself.”

— Caroline F., US

“The process is simple. The test covers everything you need, and you’ll get a clear breakdown of your results. For just a few dollars, it’s a great value.”

— Klara N., CZ

“I kept thinking there might be a small chance, but now I know for sure. The questions were easy to understand, and the whole process was straightforward.”

— Bruno M., BR

“I really enjoyed this experience. I learned a lot, and it helped me make sense of my thoughts and the feeling I’ve had for a long time that I may have grown up with undiagnosed ADHD.”

— Alice B., FR

“Great platform — the insights were genuinely meaningful!”

— Daniel W., DE

“Everything was easy to follow. The tools you get at the end are genuinely helpful for self-growth, and the price is very reasonable. I really appreciate that.”

— Sofia M., ES

“Surprisingly accurate — honestly didn’t expect it to nail things so well.”

— Adir B., IL

“There are lots of different tests to pick from, and the price is surprisingly low for how much insight you get.”

— Olivia W., CA

“I was pleasantly surprised when I read the results. It was as if someone had sorted out my messy thoughts and given me useful tips to help me speak with more confidence.”

— Grace O., IE

“It was really solid, very detailed, and it actually helped me make sense of a lot of things.”

— Carla T., TT

“I was really impressed with the report. It was clear, thoughtful, and it reflected things I’ve been noticing about myself.”

— Jade H., US

“The questions made me think deeply and helped me become more self-aware.”

— Brooke S., US

“Reading through most of the questions made me feel understood. Although I’ve already worked through some of these issues, the questions still gave me useful insights and helped me learn more about myself.”

— Ryan M., US

“I usually take one or two tests each month, and this has become a good way for me to see how I’m doing.”

— Lucas W., US

“Most of the time, my results are in the 90 to 98th percentile compared to others. It really makes me feel like there’s something unique about me.”

— Ethan C., US

“I tried out some of the AI’s suggestions, and to be honest, they worked much better than I thought they would. Maybe this thing really is smarter than me.”

— Reece D., AU

Trusted by 22k+ Users Worldwide

CLEAR ANSWERS TO COMMON QUESTIONS

Frequently Asked Questions

Any questions left?

What does this questionnaire measure?

It assesses the strength of negative stereotypes and distrustful or hostile attitudes toward men as a social group.

Who is this questionnaire intended for?

It is intended for adult women in research or applied psychological settings where gender-related attitudes are being assessed.

How long does it take and how many items are included?

It includes 36 statements and typically takes about 7 minutes to complete.

How should the statements be rated?

Rate each statement based on how closely it matches current views, using the response scale provided. Use the first response that seems accurate and avoid overthinking.

How are results interpreted and used?

Higher scores indicate more entrenched negative attitudes and broader endorsement of negative stereotypes. Results may be used to describe patterns of bias and to guide further assessment or intervention planning.

WHAT THE TEST MEASURES

About This Assessment

Misandry Scale Test

misandry sexism

This measure is designed to assess negative beliefs and attitudes toward men as a social group. The Misandry Scale uses a self-report format in which respondents rate their agreement with statements reflecting a range of prejudicial views.

The instrument contains 36 items and typically requires about 7 minutes to complete. Items are intended to capture cognitive and affective components such as distrust, stereotyping, and hostility; results are generally interpreted as an index of the strength and pervasiveness of these attitudes. Authors: Janet Shibley Hyde; Peter Glick.

The Misandry Scale may be used in research on gender-related prejudice and in clinical or counseling contexts when screening for or monitoring negative gender-based attitudes that could affect interpersonal functioning. Interpretation should consider the assessment context, response style, and relevant sociocultural factors.

Author: Janet Shibley Hyde, Peter Glick

Literature: Glick, P., & Fiske, S. T. The ambivalent sexism inventory: Differentiating hostile and benevolent sexism. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 1996.

Test Question Form