Home
Psychological tests
Registry of Presumed Information Acquisition Types

Registry of Presumed Information Acquisition Types Test

Learn how you naturally take in and organize information in about 8 minutes. Get clear results that help tailor study, coaching, and team communication for better fit and follow-through.

Start Online Test

Questions: 408 minutes

Hi! My name is Freudly, i am an AI therapist, I will give you an interpretation of the test after you complete it.

08:30

October 2, 2025

October 2, 2025
Material has been updated

October 2, 2025
Material has been published

12927 views

1490 completions

1292 likes

Scale Explorer

How the Scales are Structured

example score

27/40

Concrete-Volitional (C)

Measures a concrete-volitional learning preference characterized by independent trial-and-error experimentation and self-directed problem solving.

Less self-experimental

Balanced

Highly self-experimental

10 – 19: Less self-experimental | 20 – 29: Balanced | 30 – 40: Highly self-experimental

A score of 27 falls in the Balanced range, suggesting you often use self-directed experimentation and trial-and-error while also using some structure and guidance when needed.

example score

31/40

Abstract-Sequential (A)

Measures preference for analytical, logical learning with an emphasis on verbal information and structured, step-by-step systematization of ideas.

Lower

Moderate

Higher

10 – 19: Lower | 20 – 29: Moderate | 30 – 40: Higher

A score of 31 falls in the Higher range, indicating a strong tendency to learn through analysis, logical structure, and organized concepts.

example score

24/40

Abstract-Volitional (A)

Measures preference for intuitive, flexible learning that integrates information holistically with minimal reliance on rigid structure.

Structured-leaning

Balanced

Highly flexible

10 – 19: Structured-leaning | 20 – 30: Balanced | 31 – 40: Highly flexible

A score of 24 falls in the Balanced range, suggesting a moderate tendency toward intuitive, unstructured, holistic processing while still being able to use structure when needed.

example score

22/40

Concrete Sequential (CS)

This scale measures preference for structured, step-by-step learning grounded in concrete facts and clear instructions.

Lower preference

Moderate preference

Higher preference

10 – 19: Lower preference | 20 – 29: Moderate preference | 30 – 40: Higher preference

A score of 22 indicates a moderate tendency to learn best through clear, ordered steps and practical, concrete information.

Start Online Test

just completed the test

DATA-BASED USER COHORTS

Who Usually Takes This Test?

Students and exam takers

41%OF USERS

They want to figure out how they absorb information best so they can study faster and remember more.

Trainers and educators

34%OF USERS

They use it to adapt explanations and activities to different learners in a class or program.

Coaches and team leads

25%OF USERS

They take it to understand how people on a team process data and communicate in a way that lands.

BASED ON AGGREGATED, ANONYMIZED DATA FROM TENS OF THOUSANDS OF FREUDLY USERS.

RESULTS YOU CAN ACTUALLY USE

What You’ll See After You Finish the Test

Scale Results
— Explained Clearly

Your scores across each test scale, translated into plain, usable insights. Not just numbers, but what they actually mean for your daily life, emotional state, and overall well-being.

AI-Powered
Interpretation

A structured, clinically grounded explanation. Our AI analyzes patterns and relationships between scales to provide a coherent interpretation — without alarmist language.

Statistical
Comparison

See how you compare to others. Your scores are placed in a statistical context, showing percentiles and trends based on anonymized platform data to help you understand what`s typical.

Practical
Recommendations

Actionable guidance tailored to your profile. Receive clear, realistic suggestions you can apply immediately — focused on coping, self-regulation, and realistic next steps.

AI-Detected
Insights

Key patterns you might not notice on your own. Surfacing subtle connections in your responses that help you better understand what may be driving your current results.

Discuss with
an AI Psychologist

Clarify, reflect, and explore right away. Talk through your outcomes, ask questions, and explore meanings in a calm, non-diagnostic dialogue environment.

Start Online Test

Used in 52+ countries

Benchmarking

See How You Compare

Once you finish the test, your results will be compared with real-world data from people in your country.
Below is a preview of the benchmarks we use to place your score in context.

Specifically Voluntary (SV)

Average

20.8

Normal range

17.1 — 24.6

min.

max.

majority

This curve shows how scores are typically distributed.
Once you complete the test, your result will appear here so you can see where you land.

Abstract-sequential (A)

Average

20.2

Normal range

15.2 — 25.2

min.

max.

majority

This curve shows how scores are typically distributed.
Once you complete the test, your result will appear here so you can see where you land.

Abstract-voluntary (A)

Average

22.1

Normal range

16.5 — 27.7

min.

max.

majority

This curve shows how scores are typically distributed.
Once you complete the test, your result will appear here so you can see where you land.

Concrete-sequential (C)

Average

Normal range

23.3 — 34.6

min.

max.

majority

This curve shows how scores are typically distributed.
Once you complete the test, your result will appear here so you can see where you land.

Start Online Test

Featured On

Rated 4.8/5 by Our Customers

“Freudly really helped me discover parts of my personality I hadn’t noticed before. It strengthened the areas where I needed to grow and made me feel more grounded and confident in the parts that already worked well.”

— Emma C., US

“I wanted to understand how serious my ADHD is, and now I finally do. I also realized I need to work on my self-esteem. It has been low for a long time, and that makes daily life harder than it should be.”

— Mateo R., CA

“Reading each question felt like someone really understood me. Even though I’ve already dealt with much of this, reflecting still helped me learn something new about myself.”

— Caroline F., US

“The process is simple. The test covers everything you need, and you’ll get a clear breakdown of your results. For just a few dollars, it’s a great value.”

— Klara N., CZ

“I kept thinking there might be a small chance, but now I know for sure. The questions were easy to understand, and the whole process was straightforward.”

— Bruno M., BR

“I really enjoyed this experience. I learned a lot, and it helped me make sense of my thoughts and the feeling I’ve had for a long time that I may have grown up with undiagnosed ADHD.”

— Alice B., FR

“Great platform — the insights were genuinely meaningful!”

— Daniel W., DE

“Everything was easy to follow. The tools you get at the end are genuinely helpful for self-growth, and the price is very reasonable. I really appreciate that.”

— Sofia M., ES

“Surprisingly accurate — honestly didn’t expect it to nail things so well.”

— Adir B., IL

“There are lots of different tests to pick from, and the price is surprisingly low for how much insight you get.”

— Olivia W., CA

“I was pleasantly surprised when I read the results. It was as if someone had sorted out my messy thoughts and given me useful tips to help me speak with more confidence.”

— Grace O., IE

“It was really solid, very detailed, and it actually helped me make sense of a lot of things.”

— Carla T., TT

“I was really impressed with the report. It was clear, thoughtful, and it reflected things I’ve been noticing about myself.”

— Jade H., US

“The questions made me think deeply and helped me become more self-aware.”

— Brooke S., US

“Reading through most of the questions made me feel understood. Although I’ve already worked through some of these issues, the questions still gave me useful insights and helped me learn more about myself.”

— Ryan M., US

“I usually take one or two tests each month, and this has become a good way for me to see how I’m doing.”

— Lucas W., US

“Most of the time, my results are in the 90 to 98th percentile compared to others. It really makes me feel like there’s something unique about me.”

— Ethan C., US

“I tried out some of the AI’s suggestions, and to be honest, they worked much better than I thought they would. Maybe this thing really is smarter than me.”

— Reece D., AU

Trusted by 22k+ Users Worldwide

CLEAR ANSWERS TO COMMON QUESTIONS

Frequently Asked Questions

Any questions left?

What does this test measure?

It measures preferred patterns for taking in and organizing information. Results are reported across four types: concrete-sequential, concrete-random, abstract-sequential, and abstract-random.

How many questions are included and how long does it take?

The test includes 40 questions and typically takes about 8 minutes. Time may vary by reading speed.

What is the difference between the four types?

Concrete types focus on observable details, while abstract types focus on concepts and meanings. Sequential types prefer ordered steps, while random types use flexible, non-linear approaches.

How should responses be selected?

Select the option that best matches typical behavior rather than a preferred or ideal response. Use first impressions and answer all items.

How should the results be used?

Results support instructional planning, coaching, and learning strategy selection. They describe tendencies and do not diagnose ability, intelligence, or mental health conditions.

WHAT THE TEST MEASURES

About This Assessment

Registry of Presumed Information Assimilation Types Test

Registry of Presumed Information Acquisition Types Test

thinking style

This instrument is designed to characterize an individual’s preferred approach to acquiring and organizing information. The Registry of Presumed Information Acquisition Types provides a brief self-report profile across four information-processing styles commonly described within the Gregorc framework.

The measure consists of 40 items and typically takes about 8 minutes to complete. Results are intended to summarize relative preferences for concrete versus abstract processing and sequential versus random organization, which may inform discussions of learning habits, instructional fit, or communication approaches.

The Registry of Presumed Information Acquisition Types is best interpreted as a descriptive indicator of perceived style rather than a measure of ability, and should be considered alongside other clinical, educational, or contextual information when used for planning or feedback.

Author: david-a-kolb

Literature: Pashler, H., McDaniel, M., Rohrer, D., & Bjork, R. Learning styles: Concepts and evidence. Psychological Science in the Public Interest. 2008.

Test Question Form