Home
Psychological tests
Rational-Experiential Inventory (REI)

Rational-Experiential Inventory (REI) Test

Learn how you balance logical analysis and intuition in about 7 minutes. Use the results to tailor learning, improve communication, and make decisions faster with more confidence.

Start Online Test

Questions: 387 minutes

Hi! My name is Freudly, i am an AI therapist, I will give you an interpretation of the test after you complete it.

08:30

October 2, 2025

October 2, 2025
Material has been updated

October 2, 2025
Material has been published

27665 views

1908 completions

1592 likes

Scale Explorer

How the Scales are Structured

example score

4/5

Engagement (II) (E()

Measures how frequently a person relies on intuitive, experience- and feeling-based thinking in everyday decisions.

Infrequent

Occasional

Frequent

1 – 2.6: Infrequent | 2.7 – 3.8: Occasional | 3.9 – 5: Frequent

A score of 4 falls in the Frequent range, suggesting you often use intuition to guide decisions in day-to-day situations.

example score

3/5

Ability (IS) (A()

Measures the strength of intuitive abilities such as perception, premonition, and spontaneous decision-making.

Lower intuition

Moderate intuition

Higher intuition

1 – 2.7: Lower intuition | 2.8 – 4: Moderate intuition | 4.1 – 5: Higher intuition

A score of 3 indicates a moderate level of intuitive ability, suggesting you sometimes rely on quick, experience-based impressions but also often look for additional confirmation.

example score

2/5

Intuition (I)

Measures the tendency to rely on intuitive, fast, feeling- and experience-based impressions when making decisions.

Lower intuition

Moderate intuition

Higher intuition

1 – 2.5: Lower intuition | 2.6 – 3.9: Moderate intuition | 4 – 5: Higher intuition

A score of 2 falls in the Lower intuition range, suggesting you tend to rely less on spontaneous, sensory impressions and more on other decision-making approaches in everyday situations.

example score

3/5

Rational Use (RU)

Measures how often a person relies on a rational, analytical thinking style in everyday situations.

Infrequent use

Moderate use

Frequent use

1 – 2.6: Infrequent use | 2.7 – 3.9: Moderate use | 4 – 5: Frequent use

A score of 3 indicates a moderate tendency to apply rational, fact-based analysis in daily decision-making.

example score

3/5

Ability (A)

Measures rational abilities such as logical analysis and critical evaluation of information.

Lower rational abilities

Moderate rational abilities

High rational abilities

1 – 2.6: Lower rational abilities | 2.7 – 3.9: Moderate rational abilities | 4 – 5: High rational abilities

A score of 3 falls in the moderate range, suggesting a balanced level of rational-analytical ability that is present but not strongly pronounced.

example score

3/5

Rationality (R)

Measures the extent to which a person tends to rely on logical, analytical, and evidence-based thinking when making decisions.

Low rationality

Moderate rationality

High rationality

1 – 2.6: Low rationality | 2.7 – 3.9: Moderate rationality | 4 – 5: High rationality

A score of 3 indicates a moderate tendency to use logical analysis, with flexibility to also rely on other modes of processing depending on the situation.

Start Online Test

just completed the test

DATA-BASED USER COHORTS

Who Usually Takes This Test?

Personal growth seekers

41%OF USERS

People curious about their decision-making style take it to understand when they rely on logic versus gut feeling and how that affects everyday choices.

Coaches and consultants

34%OF USERS

Practitioners use it to quickly gauge a client’s dominant thinking mode and choose communication, motivation, and problem-solving approaches accordingly.

Students and career changers

25%OF USERS

Those choosing a study path or new role take it to see whether they learn and work best through structured analysis or intuitive, experience-based thinking.

BASED ON AGGREGATED, ANONYMIZED DATA FROM TENS OF THOUSANDS OF FREUDLY USERS.

RESULTS YOU CAN ACTUALLY USE

What You’ll See After You Finish the Test

Scale Results
— Explained Clearly

Your scores across each test scale, translated into plain, usable insights. Not just numbers, but what they actually mean for your daily life, emotional state, and overall well-being.

AI-Powered
Interpretation

A structured, clinically grounded explanation. Our AI analyzes patterns and relationships between scales to provide a coherent interpretation — without alarmist language.

Statistical
Comparison

See how you compare to others. Your scores are placed in a statistical context, showing percentiles and trends based on anonymized platform data to help you understand what`s typical.

Practical
Recommendations

Actionable guidance tailored to your profile. Receive clear, realistic suggestions you can apply immediately — focused on coping, self-regulation, and realistic next steps.

AI-Detected
Insights

Key patterns you might not notice on your own. Surfacing subtle connections in your responses that help you better understand what may be driving your current results.

Discuss with
an AI Psychologist

Clarify, reflect, and explore right away. Talk through your outcomes, ask questions, and explore meanings in a calm, non-diagnostic dialogue environment.

Start Online Test

Used in 52+ countries

Benchmarking

See How You Compare

Once you finish the test, your results will be compared with real-world data from people in your country.
Below is a preview of the benchmarks we use to place your score in context.

Use of AI (UoA)

Average

3.6

Normal range

2.9 — 4.2

min.

max.

majority

This curve shows how scores are typically distributed.
Once you complete the test, your result will appear here so you can see where you land.

Abilities (AI) (A()

Average

2.1

Normal range

1.4 — 2.8

min.

max.

majority

This curve shows how scores are typically distributed.
Once you complete the test, your result will appear here so you can see where you land.

Intuition (I)

Average

3.2

Normal range

2.7 — 3.7

min.

max.

majority

This curve shows how scores are typically distributed.
Once you complete the test, your result will appear here so you can see where you land.

Usage (AI) (U()

Average

3.9

Normal range

3.2 — 4.5

min.

max.

majority

This curve shows how scores are typically distributed.
Once you complete the test, your result will appear here so you can see where you land.

Abilities (PC) (A()

Average

Normal range

3.3 — 4.7

min.

max.

majority

This curve shows how scores are typically distributed.
Once you complete the test, your result will appear here so you can see where you land.

Rationality (R)

Average

3.2

Normal range

2.6 — 3.9

min.

max.

majority

This curve shows how scores are typically distributed.
Once you complete the test, your result will appear here so you can see where you land.

Start Online Test

Featured On

Rated 4.8/5 by Our Customers

“Freudly really helped me discover parts of my personality I hadn’t noticed before. It strengthened the areas where I needed to grow and made me feel more grounded and confident in the parts that already worked well.”

— Emma C., US

“I wanted to understand how serious my ADHD is, and now I finally do. I also realized I need to work on my self-esteem. It has been low for a long time, and that makes daily life harder than it should be.”

— Mateo R., CA

“Reading each question felt like someone really understood me. Even though I’ve already dealt with much of this, reflecting still helped me learn something new about myself.”

— Caroline F., US

“The process is simple. The test covers everything you need, and you’ll get a clear breakdown of your results. For just a few dollars, it’s a great value.”

— Klara N., CZ

“I kept thinking there might be a small chance, but now I know for sure. The questions were easy to understand, and the whole process was straightforward.”

— Bruno M., BR

“I really enjoyed this experience. I learned a lot, and it helped me make sense of my thoughts and the feeling I’ve had for a long time that I may have grown up with undiagnosed ADHD.”

— Alice B., FR

“Great platform — the insights were genuinely meaningful!”

— Daniel W., DE

“Everything was easy to follow. The tools you get at the end are genuinely helpful for self-growth, and the price is very reasonable. I really appreciate that.”

— Sofia M., ES

“Surprisingly accurate — honestly didn’t expect it to nail things so well.”

— Adir B., IL

“There are lots of different tests to pick from, and the price is surprisingly low for how much insight you get.”

— Olivia W., CA

“I was pleasantly surprised when I read the results. It was as if someone had sorted out my messy thoughts and given me useful tips to help me speak with more confidence.”

— Grace O., IE

“It was really solid, very detailed, and it actually helped me make sense of a lot of things.”

— Carla T., TT

“I was really impressed with the report. It was clear, thoughtful, and it reflected things I’ve been noticing about myself.”

— Jade H., US

“The questions made me think deeply and helped me become more self-aware.”

— Brooke S., US

“Reading through most of the questions made me feel understood. Although I’ve already worked through some of these issues, the questions still gave me useful insights and helped me learn more about myself.”

— Ryan M., US

“I usually take one or two tests each month, and this has become a good way for me to see how I’m doing.”

— Lucas W., US

“Most of the time, my results are in the 90 to 98th percentile compared to others. It really makes me feel like there’s something unique about me.”

— Ethan C., US

“I tried out some of the AI’s suggestions, and to be honest, they worked much better than I thought they would. Maybe this thing really is smarter than me.”

— Reece D., AU

Trusted by 22k+ Users Worldwide

CLEAR ANSWERS TO COMMON QUESTIONS

Frequently Asked Questions

Any questions left?

What does this questionnaire measure?

It measures two thinking styles: rational-analytical processing and intuitive-experiential processing. Scores reflect how strongly each style is endorsed in self-report.

How long does it take and how many items are included?

Completion time is approximately 7 minutes. The questionnaire contains 38 statements.

How should items be answered?

Each statement should be rated based on typical behavior and preferences rather than a specific recent event. Use the full response scale and avoid spending excessive time on any single item.

How should results be interpreted?

Results are reported as separate scores for rational and intuitive styles rather than a single overall score. Higher scores indicate stronger preference for the corresponding style, and both styles can be high or low.

Is it a clinical diagnostic tool?

It is a psychometric self-report measure and does not provide a diagnosis. Results should be interpreted in context and combined with other information when used for assessment or consultation.

WHAT THE TEST MEASURES

About This Assessment

Rational-Experiential Inventory (REI) Test

analyticity cognitive style

This self-report measure assesses individual differences in thinking style, with a focus on rational-analytic and intuitive-experiential processing. The Rational-Experiential Inventory (REI) is intended to characterize the degree to which a respondent tends to rely on deliberate, logical evaluation versus rapid, affectively informed judgment. It consists of 38 items and typically takes about 7 minutes to complete.

Items are rated using a fixed response format and yield separate indicators corresponding to the two processing modes, which may be interpreted as relatively independent dimensions rather than mutually exclusive categories. The Rational-Experiential Inventory (REI) was developed by Rosemary Pacini and may be used in clinical, counseling, and research contexts to inform case formulation, communication strategies, and hypotheses about decision-making preferences, while recognizing that results should be integrated with other assessment data.

Author: Rosemary Pacini, seymour-epstein

Literature: Evans, J. St. B. T. Dual-processing accounts of reasoning, judgment, and social cognition. Annual Review of Psychology. 2008.; Kahneman, D. Thinking, fast and slow. Farrar, Straus and Giroux. 2011.; Pacini, R., & Epstein, S. The relation of rational and experiential information processing styles to personality, basic beliefs, and the ratio-bias phenomenon. Personality and Individual Differences. 1999.

Test Question Form