Pulsar Test

Understand your team’s cohesion and readiness in just 2 minutes. Get a clear snapshot that predicts performance and pinpoints where to strengthen trust, communication, and alignment.

Start Online Test

Questions: 72 minutes

Hi! My name is Freudly, i am an AI therapist, I will give you an interpretation of the test after you complete it.

08:30

October 2, 2025

October 2, 2025
Material has been updated

October 2, 2025
Material has been published

24530 views

2502 completions

2196 likes

Scale Explorer

How the Scales are Structured

example score

5/12

Organizational Structure (OS)

Organization measures how clearly roles, statuses, and formal or informal structures are defined and followed within the team.

Low structure

Developing structure

Strong structure

1 – 4: Low structure | 5 – 7: Developing structure | 8 – 12: Strong structure

A score of 5 indicates developing structure, with some role clarity and coordination present but with inconsistencies that can affect smooth collaboration.

example score

7/12

Cohesion (C)

Cohesion reflects how stable and unified interpersonal relationships are within the team, supporting consistent joint activity.

Low cohesion

Moderate cohesion

High cohesion

1 – 6: Low cohesion | 7 – 9: Moderate cohesion | 10 – 12: High cohesion

A score of 7 indicates moderate cohesion, suggesting generally stable relationships with some areas where unity and coordination can be strengthened.

example score

5/12

Reference Group Value (RGV)

Referentiality reflects how meaningful and personally valuable being part of the team is for its members.

Low

Moderate

High

1 – 4: Low | 5 – 7: Moderate | 8 – 12: High

A score of 5 indicates a moderate level of referentiality, meaning team membership is somewhat important but not a strong source of identification for everyone.

example score

6/12

Integrativity (I)

Integrativity measures how coherent and unified the team is in its internal processes and in working toward shared goals.

Low unity

Moderate unity

High unity

1 – 4: Low unity | 5 – 7: Moderate unity | 8 – 12: High unity

A score of 6 indicates moderate unity, suggesting the team has some shared alignment but may show inconsistencies in coordination when pursuing goals.

example score

10/12

Goal Orientation (GO)

Orientation reflects how clearly team members understand shared goals, interests, and norms and how well they coordinate actions toward common outcomes.

Low

Moderate

High

1 – 6: Low | 7 – 9: Moderate | 10 – 12: High

A score of 10 indicates a high level of shared goal and norm awareness with strong coordination toward common results.

example score

10/12

Preparedness (P)

Preparedness measures how ready and organized the team is to take on assigned tasks and act effectively.

Low readiness

Developing readiness

High readiness

1 – 6: Low readiness | 7 – 9: Developing readiness | 10 – 12: High readiness

A score of 10 indicates the team is well organized and ready to move into action with minimal additional preparation.

example score

8/12

Group Development Level (GDL)

This scale measures the team’s maturity, cohesion, and overall readiness to work effectively together toward goals.

Low

Moderate

High

1 – 6: Low | 7 – 9: Moderate | 10 – 12: High

A score of 8 indicates a moderately developed team with sufficient cohesion and structure to accomplish tasks effectively, with some room for further strengthening.

example score

7/12

Activity (A)

Activity reflects how actively the team engages in socially significant actions and how fully members' potential is realized in joint work.

Low activity

Moderate activity

High activity

1 – 6: Low activity | 7 – 9: Moderate activity | 10 – 12: High activity

A score of 7 indicates moderate activity, suggesting the team generally engages in meaningful action with some room to better mobilize members' potential.

Start Online Test

just completed the test

DATA-BASED USER COHORTS

Who Usually Takes This Test?

Team leads and managers

41%OF USERS

They want a fast, structured snapshot of morale, cohesion, and readiness to deliver before setting goals or reorganizing work.

Project kickoff teams

34%OF USERS

They take it before a new initiative to spot collaboration risks early and align how the group will work together.

HR and people partners

25%OF USERS

They use it during change or growth to identify friction points and plan targeted team development support.

BASED ON AGGREGATED, ANONYMIZED DATA FROM TENS OF THOUSANDS OF FREUDLY USERS.

RESULTS YOU CAN ACTUALLY USE

What You’ll See After You Finish the Test

Scale Results
— Explained Clearly

Your scores across each test scale, translated into plain, usable insights. Not just numbers, but what they actually mean for your daily life, emotional state, and overall well-being.

AI-Powered
Interpretation

A structured, clinically grounded explanation. Our AI analyzes patterns and relationships between scales to provide a coherent interpretation — without alarmist language.

Statistical
Comparison

See how you compare to others. Your scores are placed in a statistical context, showing percentiles and trends based on anonymized platform data to help you understand what`s typical.

Practical
Recommendations

Actionable guidance tailored to your profile. Receive clear, realistic suggestions you can apply immediately — focused on coping, self-regulation, and realistic next steps.

AI-Detected
Insights

Key patterns you might not notice on your own. Surfacing subtle connections in your responses that help you better understand what may be driving your current results.

Discuss with
an AI Psychologist

Clarify, reflect, and explore right away. Talk through your outcomes, ask questions, and explore meanings in a calm, non-diagnostic dialogue environment.

Start Online Test

Used in 52+ countries

Benchmarking

See How You Compare

Once you finish the test, your results will be compared with real-world data from people in your country.
Below is a preview of the benchmarks we use to place your score in context.

Organization (O)

Average

7.8

Normal range

6.4 — 9.2

min.

max.

majority

This curve shows how scores are typically distributed.
Once you complete the test, your result will appear here so you can see where you land.

Cohesion (C)

Average

8.9

Normal range

7.3 — 10.6

min.

max.

majority

This curve shows how scores are typically distributed.
Once you complete the test, your result will appear here so you can see where you land.

Referentiality (R)

Average

4.6

Normal range

3.2 — 6.1

min.

max.

majority

This curve shows how scores are typically distributed.
Once you complete the test, your result will appear here so you can see where you land.

Integrativity (I)

Average

6.8

Normal range

5.2 — 8.4

min.

max.

majority

This curve shows how scores are typically distributed.
Once you complete the test, your result will appear here so you can see where you land.

Orientation (O)

Average

4.4

Normal range

2.3 — 6.4

min.

max.

majority

This curve shows how scores are typically distributed.
Once you complete the test, your result will appear here so you can see where you land.

Preparedness (P)

Average

4.2

Normal range

2.4 — 6

min.

max.

majority

This curve shows how scores are typically distributed.
Once you complete the test, your result will appear here so you can see where you land.

Group Development Level (GDL)

Average

4.8

Normal range

3.2 — 6.4

min.

max.

majority

This curve shows how scores are typically distributed.
Once you complete the test, your result will appear here so you can see where you land.

Activity (A)

Average

6.2

Normal range

4.8 — 7.7

min.

max.

majority

This curve shows how scores are typically distributed.
Once you complete the test, your result will appear here so you can see where you land.

Start Online Test

Featured On

Rated 4.8/5 by Our Customers

“Freudly really helped me discover parts of my personality I hadn’t noticed before. It strengthened the areas where I needed to grow and made me feel more grounded and confident in the parts that already worked well.”

— Emma C., US

“I wanted to understand how serious my ADHD is, and now I finally do. I also realized I need to work on my self-esteem. It has been low for a long time, and that makes daily life harder than it should be.”

— Mateo R., CA

“Reading each question felt like someone really understood me. Even though I’ve already dealt with much of this, reflecting still helped me learn something new about myself.”

— Caroline F., US

“The process is simple. The test covers everything you need, and you’ll get a clear breakdown of your results. For just a few dollars, it’s a great value.”

— Klara N., CZ

“I kept thinking there might be a small chance, but now I know for sure. The questions were easy to understand, and the whole process was straightforward.”

— Bruno M., BR

“I really enjoyed this experience. I learned a lot, and it helped me make sense of my thoughts and the feeling I’ve had for a long time that I may have grown up with undiagnosed ADHD.”

— Alice B., FR

“Great platform — the insights were genuinely meaningful!”

— Daniel W., DE

“Everything was easy to follow. The tools you get at the end are genuinely helpful for self-growth, and the price is very reasonable. I really appreciate that.”

— Sofia M., ES

“Surprisingly accurate — honestly didn’t expect it to nail things so well.”

— Adir B., IL

“There are lots of different tests to pick from, and the price is surprisingly low for how much insight you get.”

— Olivia W., CA

“I was pleasantly surprised when I read the results. It was as if someone had sorted out my messy thoughts and given me useful tips to help me speak with more confidence.”

— Grace O., IE

“It was really solid, very detailed, and it actually helped me make sense of a lot of things.”

— Carla T., TT

“I was really impressed with the report. It was clear, thoughtful, and it reflected things I’ve been noticing about myself.”

— Jade H., US

“The questions made me think deeply and helped me become more self-aware.”

— Brooke S., US

“Reading through most of the questions made me feel understood. Although I’ve already worked through some of these issues, the questions still gave me useful insights and helped me learn more about myself.”

— Ryan M., US

“I usually take one or two tests each month, and this has become a good way for me to see how I’m doing.”

— Lucas W., US

“Most of the time, my results are in the 90 to 98th percentile compared to others. It really makes me feel like there’s something unique about me.”

— Ethan C., US

“I tried out some of the AI’s suggestions, and to be honest, they worked much better than I thought they would. Maybe this thing really is smarter than me.”

— Reece D., AU

Trusted by 22k+ Users Worldwide

CLEAR ANSWERS TO COMMON QUESTIONS

Frequently Asked Questions

Any questions left?

What does this assessment measure?

It measures the team’s current socio-psychological climate and the strength of internal connections. Results indicate overall readiness to coordinate work and pursue shared goals.

Who should complete the assessment?

All current members of the team should complete it. Group results are calculated from the combined responses.

How long does it take and how many items are included?

It takes about 2 minutes to complete. The questionnaire includes 7 items.

How should items be answered?

Select the response that best matches typical conditions in the team. Provide independent ratings and avoid coordinating answers with others.

How are results used?

Results provide an overall profile of team cohesion and areas that may require attention. They can support planning for upcoming work, change periods, and targeted development actions.

WHAT THE TEST MEASURES

About This Assessment

Pulsar Test

team climate arrange

This measure is used to obtain a brief snapshot of group functioning and current socioemotional climate. The Pulsar Test is designed for administration to all members of a team to summarize perceptions of cohesion, coordination, and readiness to work effectively.

The instrument includes 7 items and typically takes about 2 minutes to complete. Item responses are aggregated to describe the group’s overall profile, which may help identify strengths and areas for improvement in collaboration and task-focused interaction.

The Pulsar Test is attributed to David M. Buss and is intended for use as a screening tool rather than a stand-alone diagnostic method; results should be interpreted in context with additional information about the team and setting.

Author: David M. Buss

Literature: Schein, E. H. Organizational culture and leadership. Jossey-Bass. 2004.; Cascio, W. F., & Aguinis, H. Applied psychology in human resource management. Pearson. 2005.

Test Question Form