Mach-IV Scale Test

Understand how likely someone is to distrust others and use manipulation, in about 4 minutes. Fast, research-backed results support hiring, team fit, and clearer relationship dynamics.

Start Online Test

Questions: 204 minutes

Hi! My name is Freudly, i am an AI therapist, I will give you an interpretation of the test after you complete it.

08:30

October 2, 2025

October 2, 2025
Material has been updated

October 2, 2025
Material has been published

27217 views

2342 completions

1844 likes

Scale Explorer

How the Scales are Structured

example score

61/140

Machiavellianism (M)

Measures the degree of manipulativeness, cynicism, emotional detachment, and willingness to bend moral rules to achieve goals.

Low

Moderate

High

20 – 62: Low | 63 – 86: Moderate | 87 – 140: High

A score of 61 falls in the Low range, suggesting a generally more sincere and cooperative interpersonal style with less tendency toward strategic manipulation.

Start Online Test

just completed the test

DATA-BASED USER COHORTS

Who Usually Takes This Test?

Curious self-explorers

44%OF USERS

People who want to understand whether they tend to distrust others, use tactics, or justify bending rules to get what they want.

Recruiters and HR specialists

33%OF USERS

Professionals screening candidates or diagnosing team dynamics to spot manipulative behavior that could harm trust and collaboration.

Psychologists and coaches

23%OF USERS

Practitioners who use a quick trait measure to discuss interpersonal strategy, ethics, and relationship patterns with clients.

BASED ON AGGREGATED, ANONYMIZED DATA FROM TENS OF THOUSANDS OF FREUDLY USERS.

RESULTS YOU CAN ACTUALLY USE

What You’ll See After You Finish the Test

Scale Results
— Explained Clearly

Your scores across each test scale, translated into plain, usable insights. Not just numbers, but what they actually mean for your daily life, emotional state, and overall well-being.

AI-Powered
Interpretation

A structured, clinically grounded explanation. Our AI analyzes patterns and relationships between scales to provide a coherent interpretation — without alarmist language.

Statistical
Comparison

See how you compare to others. Your scores are placed in a statistical context, showing percentiles and trends based on anonymized platform data to help you understand what`s typical.

Practical
Recommendations

Actionable guidance tailored to your profile. Receive clear, realistic suggestions you can apply immediately — focused on coping, self-regulation, and realistic next steps.

AI-Detected
Insights

Key patterns you might not notice on your own. Surfacing subtle connections in your responses that help you better understand what may be driving your current results.

Discuss with
an AI Psychologist

Clarify, reflect, and explore right away. Talk through your outcomes, ask questions, and explore meanings in a calm, non-diagnostic dialogue environment.

Start Online Test

Used in 52+ countries

Benchmarking

See How You Compare

Once you finish the test, your results will be compared with real-world data from people in your country.
Below is a preview of the benchmarks we use to place your score in context.

The Machiavellianism Scale (Mach Scale) (TMS(S)

Average

83.3

Normal range

61.8 — 104.7

min.

max.

140

majority

This curve shows how scores are typically distributed.
Once you complete the test, your result will appear here so you can see where you land.

Start Online Test

Featured On

Rated 4.8/5 by Our Customers

“Freudly really helped me discover parts of my personality I hadn’t noticed before. It strengthened the areas where I needed to grow and made me feel more grounded and confident in the parts that already worked well.”

— Emma C., US

“I wanted to understand how serious my ADHD is, and now I finally do. I also realized I need to work on my self-esteem. It has been low for a long time, and that makes daily life harder than it should be.”

— Mateo R., CA

“Reading each question felt like someone really understood me. Even though I’ve already dealt with much of this, reflecting still helped me learn something new about myself.”

— Caroline F., US

“The process is simple. The test covers everything you need, and you’ll get a clear breakdown of your results. For just a few dollars, it’s a great value.”

— Klara N., CZ

“I kept thinking there might be a small chance, but now I know for sure. The questions were easy to understand, and the whole process was straightforward.”

— Bruno M., BR

“I really enjoyed this experience. I learned a lot, and it helped me make sense of my thoughts and the feeling I’ve had for a long time that I may have grown up with undiagnosed ADHD.”

— Alice B., FR

“Great platform — the insights were genuinely meaningful!”

— Daniel W., DE

“Everything was easy to follow. The tools you get at the end are genuinely helpful for self-growth, and the price is very reasonable. I really appreciate that.”

— Sofia M., ES

“Surprisingly accurate — honestly didn’t expect it to nail things so well.”

— Adir B., IL

“There are lots of different tests to pick from, and the price is surprisingly low for how much insight you get.”

— Olivia W., CA

“I was pleasantly surprised when I read the results. It was as if someone had sorted out my messy thoughts and given me useful tips to help me speak with more confidence.”

— Grace O., IE

“It was really solid, very detailed, and it actually helped me make sense of a lot of things.”

— Carla T., TT

“I was really impressed with the report. It was clear, thoughtful, and it reflected things I’ve been noticing about myself.”

— Jade H., US

“The questions made me think deeply and helped me become more self-aware.”

— Brooke S., US

“Reading through most of the questions made me feel understood. Although I’ve already worked through some of these issues, the questions still gave me useful insights and helped me learn more about myself.”

— Ryan M., US

“I usually take one or two tests each month, and this has become a good way for me to see how I’m doing.”

— Lucas W., US

“Most of the time, my results are in the 90 to 98th percentile compared to others. It really makes me feel like there’s something unique about me.”

— Ethan C., US

“I tried out some of the AI’s suggestions, and to be honest, they worked much better than I thought they would. Maybe this thing really is smarter than me.”

— Reece D., AU

Trusted by 22k+ Users Worldwide

CLEAR ANSWERS TO COMMON QUESTIONS

Frequently Asked Questions

Any questions left?

What does this questionnaire measure?

It measures attitudes and tendencies related to interpersonal manipulation, strategic social behavior, and distrust of others. Higher scores indicate greater acceptance of using others to achieve goals.

How is it administered and how long does it take?

It consists of 20 statements rated by level of agreement. Typical completion time is about 4 minutes.

What type of items are included?

Items assess beliefs about honesty, sincerity, and trustworthiness in other people, as well as willingness to bend rules for personal benefit. Responses reflect general views rather than single events.

How should results be interpreted?

Scores are used to estimate the likelihood of manipulative tactics and low concern for ethical constraints in social situations. Interpretation should consider context and should not be treated as a diagnosis.

Is there a version for children or adolescents?

A youth version exists with simpler wording and age-appropriate content. It is used when adult phrasing is not suitable for younger respondents.

WHAT THE TEST MEASURES

About This Assessment

Mach-IV Scale Test

machiavellianism manipulations dark triad

This self-report measure assesses individual differences in Machiavellian attitudes and interpersonal strategy. The Mach-IV Scale is commonly used to quantify cynical views of human nature and a pragmatic, ends-oriented approach to social behavior. It was developed by Richard Christie and Florence L. Geis.

The instrument consists of 20 items and typically takes about 4 minutes to complete. Items ask respondents to indicate their level of agreement with statements reflecting beliefs about trustworthiness, sincerity, and the acceptability of using influence or manipulation to achieve personal goals.

Scores from the Mach-IV Scale are interpreted as an index of Machiavellian tendencies and may be considered within a broader psychological assessment context, taking into account response style, setting, and the limits of self-report data.

Author: Florence L. Geis, Richard Christie

Literature: Paulhus, D. L., & Williams, K. M. The dark triad of personality: Narcissism, Machiavellianism, and psychopathy. Journal of Research in Personality. 2002.; Jones, D. N., & Paulhus, D. L. Introducing the Short Dark Triad (SD3): A brief measure of dark personality traits. Assessment. 2014.; Furnham, A., Richards, S. C., & Paulhus, D. L. The Dark Triad of personality: A 10 year review. Social and Personality Psychology Compass. 2013.; Christie, R., & Geis, F. Studies in Machiavellianism. Academic Press. 1970.

Test Question Form