Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS) Test

Understand how pain-related thoughts and emotions may intensify suffering in about 3 minutes. This 13-item screen supports faster, more tailored care and coping strategies.

Start Online Test

Questions: 133 minutes

Hi! My name is Freudly, i am an AI therapist, I will give you an interpretation of the test after you complete it.

08:30

October 2, 2025

October 2, 2025
Material has been updated

October 2, 2025
Material has been published

12719 views

686 completions

566 likes

Scale Explorer

How the Scales are Structured

example score

10/24

Helplessness (H)

Measures the degree to which a person feels helpless and unable to control the situation when experiencing pain.

Low helplessness

Moderate helplessness

High helplessness

0 – 8: Low helplessness | 9 – 16: Moderate helplessness | 17 – 24: High helplessness

A score of 10 falls in the Moderate helplessness range, suggesting a noticeable but not severe tendency to feel powerless when in pain.

example score

5/12

Magnification (M)

Measures the tendency to magnify the severity and potential consequences of pain sensations.

Low magnification

Moderate magnification

High magnification

0 – 3: Low magnification | 4 – 7: Moderate magnification | 8 – 12: High magnification

A score of 5 indicates a moderate tendency to interpret pain as more intense or consequential than it may objectively be.

example score

9/16

Rumination (R)

Measures how strongly a person tends to ruminate on pain sensations and related thoughts.

Low

Moderate

High

0 – 5: Low | 6 – 10: Moderate | 11 – 16: High

A score of 9 falls in the Moderate range, suggesting a noticeable tendency to return to pain-focused thoughts without this being consistently dominant.

example score

15/52

Pain Catastrophizing (PC)

The Pain Catastrophizing Scale measures the extent to which a person tends to respond to pain with exaggerated negative thoughts and feelings (rumination, magnification, and helplessness).

Low

Moderate

High

0 – 17: Low | 18 – 34: Moderate | 35 – 52: High

A score of 15 falls in the Low range, suggesting relatively infrequent catastrophizing thoughts and emotions in response to pain.

Start Online Test

just completed the test

DATA-BASED USER COHORTS

Who Usually Takes This Test?

People with chronic pain

44%OF USERS

They take it to see how much worry, rumination, and fear are amplifying long-lasting pain conditions like back pain, migraines, or fibromyalgia.

Injured or post-surgery patients

31%OF USERS

They use it during recovery to understand whether negative thoughts about pain are slowing healing or increasing avoidance of movement.

Clinicians and researchers

25%OF USERS

They administer it to quickly screen patients’ pain-related thinking patterns and help guide treatment planning or study outcomes.

BASED ON AGGREGATED, ANONYMIZED DATA FROM TENS OF THOUSANDS OF FREUDLY USERS.

RESULTS YOU CAN ACTUALLY USE

What You’ll See After You Finish the Test

Scale Results
— Explained Clearly

Your scores across each test scale, translated into plain, usable insights. Not just numbers, but what they actually mean for your daily life, emotional state, and overall well-being.

AI-Powered
Interpretation

A structured, clinically grounded explanation. Our AI analyzes patterns and relationships between scales to provide a coherent interpretation — without alarmist language.

Statistical
Comparison

See how you compare to others. Your scores are placed in a statistical context, showing percentiles and trends based on anonymized platform data to help you understand what`s typical.

Practical
Recommendations

Actionable guidance tailored to your profile. Receive clear, realistic suggestions you can apply immediately — focused on coping, self-regulation, and realistic next steps.

AI-Detected
Insights

Key patterns you might not notice on your own. Surfacing subtle connections in your responses that help you better understand what may be driving your current results.

Discuss with
an AI Psychologist

Clarify, reflect, and explore right away. Talk through your outcomes, ask questions, and explore meanings in a calm, non-diagnostic dialogue environment.

Start Online Test

Used in 52+ countries

Benchmarking

See How You Compare

Once you finish the test, your results will be compared with real-world data from people in your country.
Below is a preview of the benchmarks we use to place your score in context.

Hopelessness (H)

Average

14.8

Normal range

11.2 — 18.5

min.

max.

majority

This curve shows how scores are typically distributed.
Once you complete the test, your result will appear here so you can see where you land.

Exaggeration (E)

Average

6.7

Normal range

4.7 — 8.7

min.

max.

majority

This curve shows how scores are typically distributed.
Once you complete the test, your result will appear here so you can see where you land.

Mental Chewing Gum (MCG)

Average

11.3

Normal range

8.9 — 13.8

min.

max.

majority

This curve shows how scores are typically distributed.
Once you complete the test, your result will appear here so you can see where you land.

Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS)

Average

24.5

Normal range

17.1 — 31.9

min.

max.

majority

This curve shows how scores are typically distributed.
Once you complete the test, your result will appear here so you can see where you land.

Start Online Test

Featured On

Rated 4.8/5 by Our Customers

“Freudly really helped me discover parts of my personality I hadn’t noticed before. It strengthened the areas where I needed to grow and made me feel more grounded and confident in the parts that already worked well.”

— Emma C., US

“I wanted to understand how serious my ADHD is, and now I finally do. I also realized I need to work on my self-esteem. It has been low for a long time, and that makes daily life harder than it should be.”

— Mateo R., CA

“Reading each question felt like someone really understood me. Even though I’ve already dealt with much of this, reflecting still helped me learn something new about myself.”

— Caroline F., US

“The process is simple. The test covers everything you need, and you’ll get a clear breakdown of your results. For just a few dollars, it’s a great value.”

— Klara N., CZ

“I kept thinking there might be a small chance, but now I know for sure. The questions were easy to understand, and the whole process was straightforward.”

— Bruno M., BR

“I really enjoyed this experience. I learned a lot, and it helped me make sense of my thoughts and the feeling I’ve had for a long time that I may have grown up with undiagnosed ADHD.”

— Alice B., FR

“Great platform — the insights were genuinely meaningful!”

— Daniel W., DE

“Everything was easy to follow. The tools you get at the end are genuinely helpful for self-growth, and the price is very reasonable. I really appreciate that.”

— Sofia M., ES

“Surprisingly accurate — honestly didn’t expect it to nail things so well.”

— Adir B., IL

“There are lots of different tests to pick from, and the price is surprisingly low for how much insight you get.”

— Olivia W., CA

“I was pleasantly surprised when I read the results. It was as if someone had sorted out my messy thoughts and given me useful tips to help me speak with more confidence.”

— Grace O., IE

“It was really solid, very detailed, and it actually helped me make sense of a lot of things.”

— Carla T., TT

“I was really impressed with the report. It was clear, thoughtful, and it reflected things I’ve been noticing about myself.”

— Jade H., US

“The questions made me think deeply and helped me become more self-aware.”

— Brooke S., US

“Reading through most of the questions made me feel understood. Although I’ve already worked through some of these issues, the questions still gave me useful insights and helped me learn more about myself.”

— Ryan M., US

“I usually take one or two tests each month, and this has become a good way for me to see how I’m doing.”

— Lucas W., US

“Most of the time, my results are in the 90 to 98th percentile compared to others. It really makes me feel like there’s something unique about me.”

— Ethan C., US

“I tried out some of the AI’s suggestions, and to be honest, they worked much better than I thought they would. Maybe this thing really is smarter than me.”

— Reece D., AU

Trusted by 22k+ Users Worldwide

CLEAR ANSWERS TO COMMON QUESTIONS

Frequently Asked Questions

Any questions left?

What does this questionnaire measure?

It measures how strongly pain is linked to negative thoughts and emotional reactions. It focuses on patterns such as rumination, magnification, and helplessness.

Who is this questionnaire intended for?

It is intended for adults and adolescents who are experiencing acute or chronic pain. It is commonly used in clinical care and research settings.

How long does it take and how many items are included?

It includes 13 items and typically takes about 3 minutes to complete. Items ask how often specific thoughts or feelings occur during pain.

How should items be answered?

Select the response option that best matches how often each thought or feeling occurs when in pain. Answer based on typical experiences rather than a single unusual episode.

How are results used?

Higher scores indicate more frequent catastrophic thinking related to pain. Results can support treatment planning and selection of psychological strategies alongside medical care.

WHAT THE TEST MEASURES

About This Assessment

Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS) Test

pain syndrome psychopathology somatics

This measure is designed to assess pain-related catastrophic thinking in adults. The Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS) is a brief self-report inventory that evaluates the frequency of maladaptive cognitive and emotional responses to pain.

Developed by Michael J. L. Sullivan and Judith A. Turner, it contains 13 items and typically takes about 3 minutes to complete. Responses can help characterize the extent to which pain is appraised as overwhelming or threatening, which may be relevant in clinical assessment and treatment planning.

In medical and behavioral health settings, the Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS) may be used to support case conceptualization, monitor change over time, and inform interventions targeting pain coping and related distress.

Author: Judith A. Turner, Michael J. L. Sullivan

Literature: Sullivan, M. J. L., Bishop, S. R., & Pivik, J. The pain catastrophizing scale: Development and validation. Psychological Assessment. 1995.

Test Question Form