Personal Innovative Potential Assessment Test

Understand your innovation style in 7 minutes, from how you think and value ideas to how you apply them. Get clear, practical insights to support hiring, coaching, and team fit.
Start Online Test
Questions367 minutes
Hi! My name is Freudly, i am an AI therapist, I will give you an interpretation of the test after you complete it.
08:30
October 2, 2025
October 2, 2025
Material has been updated
22905 views
2284 completions
1925 likes
Share
Scale Explorer
How the Scales are Structured
example score
26/36
Organization of One's Own Life (OoOOL)
Measures innovative potential in organizing and improving one’s personal routines, habits, and everyday life systems.
Low
Moderate
High
012Low1324Moderate2536High
A score of 26 falls in the High range, indicating a strong tendency to introduce and sustain practical innovations in personal organization and daily life.
example score
26/36
Cultural (C)
Measures how strongly a person expresses innovative potential in the cultural sphere, including reworking traditions and cultural practices.
Lower cultural innovation
Moderate cultural innovation
High cultural innovation
012Lower cultural innovation1324Moderate cultural innovation2536High cultural innovation
A score of 26 falls in the High cultural innovation range, suggesting a strong tendency to generate and implement new ideas within cultural contexts while engaging with traditions.
example score
17/36
Social (S)
Measures innovative potential expressed through social interactions, such as influencing relationships, groups, and communities with new ideas.
Low
Moderate
High
012Low1324Moderate2536High
A score of 17 indicates a moderate capacity to introduce and support innovations in interpersonal and group settings, with room to strengthen social influence and collaboration around change.
example score
10/36
Natural (Environmental) (N()
Measures how strongly a person’s innovative potential shows up in interacting with and improving the natural and surrounding environment.
Limited
Developing
Strong
012Limited1324Developing2536Strong
A score of 10 falls in the Limited range, suggesting environmental and ecological innovation is present but not a primary area of innovative expression right now.
example score
20/24
Negative-Generalized (NG) (N()
Measures the extent to which a person tends to generalize change as broadly negative and may resist innovation.
Low
Moderate
High
08Low916Moderate1724High
A score of 20 falls in the High range, suggesting a pronounced tendency to view change negatively and to approach innovations with resistance or skepticism.
example score
9/24
Positive-Selective (PS) (P()
Measures a person’s positive and selective openness to change, reflecting flexibility toward adopting innovations.
Cautious toward change
Selective openness
Highly open and flexible
08Cautious toward change916Selective openness1724Highly open and flexible
A score of 9 indicates selective openness to change, suggesting you may engage with innovations when they seem useful or well-justified.
example score
10/24
Formal-Accumulating (FA) (F()
Measures the tendency to collect and store information in a formal way without integrating it into deep understanding or active innovative use.
Integrative use
Mixed style
Info-accumulating
07Integrative use816Mixed style1724Info-accumulating
A score of 10 falls in the Mixed style range, suggesting you sometimes gather information without fully synthesizing it, but can also move toward more meaningful understanding when engaged.
example score
12/24
Meaningful-Intensive (MI) (M()
Measures the degree of active, conscious initiative a person shows in seeking out and acquiring new information and knowledge.
Low initiative
Moderate initiative
High initiative
08Low initiative916Moderate initiative1724High initiative
A score of 12 indicates a moderate tendency to proactively look for new information, with initiative that is present but not consistently intense.
example score
15/48
Praxeological Aspect (P) (PA()
Measures how effectively a person applies ideas and knowledge in practice when facing new or uncertain situations.
Emerging application
Developing application
Strong application
016Emerging application1732Developing application3348Strong application
A score of 15 falls in the Emerging application range, suggesting innovative ideas may be harder to translate into consistent practical action in unfamiliar situations without additional structure or support.
example score
34/48
Axiological Aspect (A) (AA()
Measures how effectively a person evaluates new phenomena and determines their personal significance based on their values.
Emerging value clarity
Developing value system
Strong value-based evaluation
016Emerging value clarity1732Developing value system3348Strong value-based evaluation
A score of 34 indicates strong value-based evaluation, suggesting you can usually judge the significance of new ideas in a way that supports innovative behavior.
example score
35/48
Epistemological Aspect (G) (EA()
Measures how actively a person seeks out, perceives, and navigates new information spaces.
Low
Moderate
High
016Low1732Moderate3348High
A score of 35 falls in the High range, indicating a strong tendency to explore and quickly orient to new information and ideas.
example score
103/144
Overall Personal Innovative Potential Index (OPIPI)
Measures overall innovative potential by integrating cognitive, value-oriented, and practical implementation tendencies toward new ideas.
Lower innovative potential
Moderate innovative potential
High innovative potential
048Lower innovative potential4996Moderate innovative potential97144High innovative potential
A score of 103 falls in the High innovative potential range, suggesting a strong tendency to seek, evaluate, and translate new ideas into action.
example score
21/24
Initiative-Transformational (IT) (I()
Measures the degree to which a person proactively drives change and implements innovations in real situations.
Low
Moderate
High
08Low916Moderate1724High
A score of 21 falls in the High range, indicating a strong tendency to take initiative and actively transform situations by putting new ideas into action.
example score
14/24
Forced-Adaptive (FA) (F()
Measures the degree to which a person adapts to change primarily due to external pressure rather than self-initiated innovation.
Self-directed adapter
Mixed adaptation
Pressure-driven adapter
08Self-directed adapter916Mixed adaptation1724Pressure-driven adapter
A score of 14 falls in the Mixed adaptation range, suggesting you may sometimes implement changes proactively but often adjust in response to situational demands.
Start Online Test
just completed the test
DATA-BASED USER COHORTS
Who Usually Takes This Test?
HR and Talent Leaders
41%OF USERS
People involved in hiring, assessment, or team building use it to spot how candidates and employees generate, value, and implement new ideas.
Managers and Team Leads
34%OF USERS
Leaders take it to understand their own innovation style and how to assign roles, motivate, and structure work for better experimentation and execution.
Students and Career Changers
25%OF USERS
People exploring study or career directions use it to identify where their creative strengths fit best and what supports their growth.
BASED ON AGGREGATED, ANONYMIZED DATA FROM TENS OF THOUSANDS OF FREUDLY USERS.
RESULTS YOU CAN ACTUALLY USE
What You’ll See After You Finish the Test
Scale Results
— Explained Clearly
Your scores across each test scale, translated into plain, usable insights. Not just numbers, but what they actually mean for your daily life, emotional state, and overall well-being.
AI-Powered
Interpretation
A structured, clinically grounded explanation. Our AI analyzes patterns and relationships between scales to provide a coherent interpretation — without alarmist language.
Statistical
Comparison
See how you compare to others. Your scores are placed in a statistical context, showing percentiles and trends based on anonymized platform data to help you understand what`s typical.
Practical
Recommendations
Actionable guidance tailored to your profile. Receive clear, realistic suggestions you can apply immediately — focused on coping, self-regulation, and realistic next steps.
AI-Detected
Insights
Key patterns you might not notice on your own. Surfacing subtle connections in your responses that help you better understand what may be driving your current results.
Discuss with
an AI Psychologist
Clarify, reflect, and explore right away. Talk through your outcomes, ask questions, and explore meanings in a calm, non-diagnostic dialogue environment.
Start Online Test
Used in 52+ countries
Benchmarking
See How You Compare
Once you finish the test, your results will be compared with real-world data from people in your country.
Below is a preview of the benchmarks we use to place your score in context.
Life Management Organizations (LMO)
Average
17.6
Normal range
11.623.5
min.
0
max.
36
majority
This curve shows how scores are typically distributed.
Once you complete the test, your result will appear here so you can see where you land.
Cultural (C)
Average
22.4
Normal range
16.528.3
min.
0
max.
36
majority
This curve shows how scores are typically distributed.
Once you complete the test, your result will appear here so you can see where you land.
Social (S)
Average
25.8
Normal range
19.432.3
min.
0
max.
36
majority
This curve shows how scores are typically distributed.
Once you complete the test, your result will appear here so you can see where you land.
Natural (environmental) (N()
Average
25.1
Normal range
20.729.6
min.
0
max.
36
majority
This curve shows how scores are typically distributed.
Once you complete the test, your result will appear here so you can see where you land.
negatively generalized (NG) (ng()
Average
11.1
Normal range
7.514.8
min.
0
max.
24
majority
This curve shows how scores are typically distributed.
Once you complete the test, your result will appear here so you can see where you land.
positively differentiated (PD) (pd()
Average
17.1
Normal range
13.121
min.
0
max.
24
majority
This curve shows how scores are typically distributed.
Once you complete the test, your result will appear here so you can see where you land.
formally-accumulative (FA) (f()
Average
17.6
Normal range
14.121.1
min.
0
max.
24
majority
This curve shows how scores are typically distributed.
Once you complete the test, your result will appear here so you can see where you land.
meaningful-intensive (MI) (m()
Average
16.6
Normal range
13.419.8
min.
0
max.
24
majority
This curve shows how scores are typically distributed.
Once you complete the test, your result will appear here so you can see where you land.
Praxeological Aspect (P) (PA()
Average
19.7
Normal range
12.527
min.
0
max.
48
majority
This curve shows how scores are typically distributed.
Once you complete the test, your result will appear here so you can see where you land.
Axiological Aspect (A) (AA()
Average
34.1
Normal range
27.340.9
min.
0
max.
48
majority
This curve shows how scores are typically distributed.
Once you complete the test, your result will appear here so you can see where you land.
Epistemological Aspect (E) (EA()
Average
24.3
Normal range
17.331.3
min.
0
max.
48
majority
This curve shows how scores are typically distributed.
Once you complete the test, your result will appear here so you can see where you land.
Integral IPL Index (III)
Average
74.3
Normal range
51.397.2
min.
0
max.
144
majority
This curve shows how scores are typically distributed.
Once you complete the test, your result will appear here so you can see where you land.
initiative-transformational (IT) (i()
Average
16
Normal range
1219.9
min.
0
max.
24
majority
This curve shows how scores are typically distributed.
Once you complete the test, your result will appear here so you can see where you land.
coercive-adaptive (CA) (c()
Average
12.9
Normal range
9.416.4
min.
0
max.
24
majority
This curve shows how scores are typically distributed.
Once you complete the test, your result will appear here so you can see where you land.
Featured On
Rated 4.8/5 by Our Customers
Freudly really helped me discover parts of my personality I hadn’t noticed before. It strengthened the areas where I needed to grow and made me feel more grounded and confident in the parts that already worked well.
Emma C., US
I wanted to understand how serious my ADHD is, and now I finally do. I also realized I need to work on my self-esteem. It has been low for a long time, and that makes daily life harder than it should be.
Mateo R., CA
Reading each question felt like someone really understood me. Even though I’ve already dealt with much of this, reflecting still helped me learn something new about myself.
Caroline F., US
The process is simple. The test covers everything you need, and you’ll get a clear breakdown of your results. For just a few dollars, it’s a great value.
Klara N., CZ
I kept thinking there might be a small chance, but now I know for sure. The questions were easy to understand, and the whole process was straightforward.
Bruno M., BR
I really enjoyed this experience. I learned a lot, and it helped me make sense of my thoughts and the feeling I’ve had for a long time that I may have grown up with undiagnosed ADHD.
Alice B., FR
Great platform — the insights were genuinely meaningful!
Daniel W., DE
Everything was easy to follow. The tools you get at the end are genuinely helpful for self-growth, and the price is very reasonable. I really appreciate that.
Sofia M., ES
Surprisingly accurate — honestly didn’t expect it to nail things so well.
Adir B., IL
There are lots of different tests to pick from, and the price is surprisingly low for how much insight you get.
Olivia W., CA
I was pleasantly surprised when I read the results. It was as if someone had sorted out my messy thoughts and given me useful tips to help me speak with more confidence.
Grace O., IE
It was really solid, very detailed, and it actually helped me make sense of a lot of things.
Carla T., TT
I was really impressed with the report. It was clear, thoughtful, and it reflected things I’ve been noticing about myself.
Jade H., US
The questions made me think deeply and helped me become more self-aware.
Brooke S., US
Reading through most of the questions made me feel understood. Although I’ve already worked through some of these issues, the questions still gave me useful insights and helped me learn more about myself.
Ryan M., US
I usually take one or two tests each month, and this has become a good way for me to see how I’m doing.
Lucas W., US
Most of the time, my results are in the 90 to 98th percentile compared to others. It really makes me feel like there’s something unique about me.
Ethan C., US
I tried out some of the AI’s suggestions, and to be honest, they worked much better than I thought they would. Maybe this thing really is smarter than me.
Reece D., AU
Trusted by 22k+ Users Worldwide
CLEAR ANSWERS TO COMMON QUESTIONS
Frequently Asked Questions

Any questions left?

What does this assessment measure?
It measures innovative potential across three areas: how information is perceived and understood, what is valued, and how knowledge is applied in practice. Results describe common patterns in how innovation is approached and implemented.
How long does it take and how many items are included?
Estimated completion time is about 7 minutes. The assessment includes 36 questions.
What types of tasks are used?
Items present short prompts that reflect everyday problem-solving and decision-making. Responses indicate preferred ways of generating, evaluating, and carrying out new ideas.
How should responses be selected?
Select the option that best matches typical behavior, not an ideal or expected response. Answer all items without spending excessive time on any single question.
How are results used?
Results can support selection, training, career guidance, and team development by identifying innovation style and likely strengths. They are intended to guide discussion and development planning rather than provide a diagnosis.
WHAT THE TEST MEASURES
About This Assessment
Methodology for Studying an Individual's Innovative Potential Test

Personal Innovative Potential Assessment Test

This measure is designed to screen individual differences in creative and innovation-oriented thinking and behavior. The Personal Innovative Potential Assessment is intended to clarify how a person tends to perceive and interpret information, what they value, and how they translate ideas into action. It consists of 36 items and typically takes about 7 minutes to complete.

The content is commonly framed around cognitive, value-based, and practical components of innovative functioning, with results summarized into interpretable profiles that can inform discussion of innovation-related style and activity. The Personal Innovative Potential Assessment has been referenced in the diffusion and innovation literature (Everett M. Rogers) and may be used as an adjunct in research or applied settings such as selection, training, career counseling, and team development, alongside other sources of clinical or organizational information.

Author: Everett M. Rogers
Literature: Rogers, E. M. Diffusion of innovations. Free Press. 2003.
Test Question Form
You Might Also Like
Learning Motivation Assessment
In educational and clinical settings, brief screening can help clarify fact…
Start Test
Student Personality Socialization Assessment
This measure is designed to evaluate how a student functions in everyday so…
Start Test
Creative Potential Assessment
This instrument is designed to provide a brief, structured appraisal of ind…
Start Test
Comments
Leave a Comment