Political Justice Scale Test

Understand how fair and respectful political decision-making feels in just 3 minutes. Get a quick, objective snapshot to pinpoint trust gaps and track shifts after reforms.

Start Online Test

Questions: 153 minutes

Hi! My name is Freudly, i am an AI therapist, I will give you an interpretation of the test after you complete it.

08:30

October 2, 2025

October 2, 2025
Material has been updated

October 2, 2025
Material has been published

26080 views

3297 completions

2689 likes

Scale Explorer

How the Scales are Structured

example score

5/7

Informational (I)

Measures how complete, honest, and timely political authorities’ explanations and information about decisions and their rationale are perceived to be.

Low clarity

Moderate clarity

High clarity

1 – 3: Low clarity | 4 – 5: Moderate clarity | 6 – 7: High clarity

A score of 5 suggests you generally perceive political decisions as being explained fairly well and in a reasonably timely way, though some details or transparency may still feel insufficient.

example score

4/7

Interpersonal (I)

Measures how respectfully and politely political authorities communicate with citizens during decision-making processes.

Low respect

Mixed respect

High respect

1 – 3: Low respect | 4 – 5: Mixed respect | 6 – 7: High respect

A score of 4 suggests a mixed perception of interpersonal treatment, indicating respect is present but not consistently experienced.

example score

3/7

Procedural (P)

Measures how fair, consistent, and participatory the political decision-making process seems, including whether people feel they can influence decisions and are treated impartially.

Low perceived procedural fairness

Moderate perceived procedural fairness

High perceived procedural fairness

1 – 3: Low perceived procedural fairness | 3.1 – 5: Moderate perceived procedural fairness | 5.1 – 7: High perceived procedural fairness

A score of 3 indicates low perceived procedural fairness, suggesting the decision-making process is seen as not very impartial or open to meaningful citizen influence.

example score

5/7

Procedural Justice Total Score (PJTS)

This scale measures how fair, transparent, and consistently applied political decision-making procedures are perceived to be.

Low fairness

Moderate fairness

High fairness

1 – 3: Low fairness | 4 – 5: Moderate fairness | 6 – 7: High fairness

A score of 5 suggests a generally positive but not fully strong perception that political procedures are fair and transparent.

Start Online Test

just completed the test

DATA-BASED USER COHORTS

Who Usually Takes This Test?

Civically engaged voters

41%OF USERS

People who follow politics closely use it to check whether government decisions feel fair, transparent, and respectful.

Researchers and students

34%OF USERS

Social science students and researchers take it to measure procedural, informational, and interpersonal justice in surveys or focus groups.

Community advocates

25%OF USERS

Activists and local organizers use it to identify where institutions are losing trust and what communication or decision steps need improvement.

BASED ON AGGREGATED, ANONYMIZED DATA FROM TENS OF THOUSANDS OF FREUDLY USERS.

RESULTS YOU CAN ACTUALLY USE

What You’ll See After You Finish the Test

Scale Results
— Explained Clearly

Your scores across each test scale, translated into plain, usable insights. Not just numbers, but what they actually mean for your daily life, emotional state, and overall well-being.

AI-Powered
Interpretation

A structured, clinically grounded explanation. Our AI analyzes patterns and relationships between scales to provide a coherent interpretation — without alarmist language.

Statistical
Comparison

See how you compare to others. Your scores are placed in a statistical context, showing percentiles and trends based on anonymized platform data to help you understand what`s typical.

Practical
Recommendations

Actionable guidance tailored to your profile. Receive clear, realistic suggestions you can apply immediately — focused on coping, self-regulation, and realistic next steps.

AI-Detected
Insights

Key patterns you might not notice on your own. Surfacing subtle connections in your responses that help you better understand what may be driving your current results.

Discuss with
an AI Psychologist

Clarify, reflect, and explore right away. Talk through your outcomes, ask questions, and explore meanings in a calm, non-diagnostic dialogue environment.

Start Online Test

Used in 52+ countries

Benchmarking

See How You Compare

Once you finish the test, your results will be compared with real-world data from people in your country.
Below is a preview of the benchmarks we use to place your score in context.

Informational (I)

Average

3.3

Normal range

2.3 — 4.4

min.

max.

majority

This curve shows how scores are typically distributed.
Once you complete the test, your result will appear here so you can see where you land.

Interpersonal (I)

Average

4.5

Normal range

3.5 — 5.4

min.

max.

majority

This curve shows how scores are typically distributed.
Once you complete the test, your result will appear here so you can see where you land.

Procedural (P)

Average

4.4

Normal range

3.3 — 5.4

min.

max.

majority

This curve shows how scores are typically distributed.
Once you complete the test, your result will appear here so you can see where you land.

Overall Procedural Justice Score (OPJS)

Average

4.6

Normal range

3.5 — 5.7

min.

max.

majority

This curve shows how scores are typically distributed.
Once you complete the test, your result will appear here so you can see where you land.

Start Online Test

Featured On

Rated 4.8/5 by Our Customers

“Freudly really helped me discover parts of my personality I hadn’t noticed before. It strengthened the areas where I needed to grow and made me feel more grounded and confident in the parts that already worked well.”

— Emma C., US

“I wanted to understand how serious my ADHD is, and now I finally do. I also realized I need to work on my self-esteem. It has been low for a long time, and that makes daily life harder than it should be.”

— Mateo R., CA

“Reading each question felt like someone really understood me. Even though I’ve already dealt with much of this, reflecting still helped me learn something new about myself.”

— Caroline F., US

“The process is simple. The test covers everything you need, and you’ll get a clear breakdown of your results. For just a few dollars, it’s a great value.”

— Klara N., CZ

“I kept thinking there might be a small chance, but now I know for sure. The questions were easy to understand, and the whole process was straightforward.”

— Bruno M., BR

“I really enjoyed this experience. I learned a lot, and it helped me make sense of my thoughts and the feeling I’ve had for a long time that I may have grown up with undiagnosed ADHD.”

— Alice B., FR

“Great platform — the insights were genuinely meaningful!”

— Daniel W., DE

“Everything was easy to follow. The tools you get at the end are genuinely helpful for self-growth, and the price is very reasonable. I really appreciate that.”

— Sofia M., ES

“Surprisingly accurate — honestly didn’t expect it to nail things so well.”

— Adir B., IL

“There are lots of different tests to pick from, and the price is surprisingly low for how much insight you get.”

— Olivia W., CA

“I was pleasantly surprised when I read the results. It was as if someone had sorted out my messy thoughts and given me useful tips to help me speak with more confidence.”

— Grace O., IE

“It was really solid, very detailed, and it actually helped me make sense of a lot of things.”

— Carla T., TT

“I was really impressed with the report. It was clear, thoughtful, and it reflected things I’ve been noticing about myself.”

— Jade H., US

“The questions made me think deeply and helped me become more self-aware.”

— Brooke S., US

“Reading through most of the questions made me feel understood. Although I’ve already worked through some of these issues, the questions still gave me useful insights and helped me learn more about myself.”

— Ryan M., US

“I usually take one or two tests each month, and this has become a good way for me to see how I’m doing.”

— Lucas W., US

“Most of the time, my results are in the 90 to 98th percentile compared to others. It really makes me feel like there’s something unique about me.”

— Ethan C., US

“I tried out some of the AI’s suggestions, and to be honest, they worked much better than I thought they would. Maybe this thing really is smarter than me.”

— Reece D., AU

Trusted by 22k+ Users Worldwide

CLEAR ANSWERS TO COMMON QUESTIONS

Frequently Asked Questions

Any questions left?

What does this questionnaire measure?

It measures perceived fairness of political decision-making procedures. It covers procedural fairness, the quality of explanations, and respectful treatment by authorities.

What types of items are included?

Items ask about how consistent and unbiased procedures seem, how clear and timely information is, and how politely officials communicate. Responses reflect perceptions of process rather than policy outcomes.

How long does it take and how many questions are there?

It includes 15 questions and typically takes about 3 minutes to complete.

How should responses be selected?

Select the option that best matches typical experiences or general impressions. Use the full range of response options when appropriate.

How are results used?

Results summarize perceived fairness across multiple dimensions and can highlight areas of concern such as unclear explanations or disrespectful communication. They are intended for group-level monitoring and comparison over time.

WHAT THE TEST MEASURES

About This Assessment

Measuring Justice in the Political Sphere Test

Political Justice Scale Test

civil consciousness justice

In political contexts, perceptions of fairness and transparency in decision-making can shape trust and acceptance of outcomes. The Political Justice Scale is a brief self-report measure designed to assess perceived fairness of political decision-making processes.

The instrument consists of 15 items and typically requires about 3 minutes to complete. It is commonly used in research or program evaluation to characterize respondents’ perceptions across multiple facets of justice relevant to public institutions, including perceptions of procedural fairness, adequacy and clarity of explanations, and respectful interpersonal treatment. The Political Justice Scale was developed by John T. Jost and Tom R. Tyler.

Author: John T. Jost, Tom R. Tyler

Literature: Tyler, T. R. Why people obey the law. Princeton University Press. 2006.

Test Question Form