Political Justice Scale Test

Understand how fair and respectful political decision-making feels in just 3 minutes. Get a quick, objective snapshot to pinpoint trust gaps and track shifts after reforms.

Start Online Test

Questions: 153 minutes

Hi! My name is Freudly, i am an AI therapist, I will give you an interpretation of the test after you complete it.

08:30

October 2, 2025

October 2, 2025
Material has been updated

October 2, 2025
Material has been published

26,080 views

3,297 completions

2,689 likes

Verified by Daniel Hall

Psychologist with 25 years of experience

Scale Explorer

How the Scales are Structured

example score

5/7

Informational (I)

Measures how complete, honest, and timely political authorities’ explanations and information about decisions and their rationale are perceived to be.

Low clarity

Moderate clarity

High clarity

1 – 3: Low clarity | 4 – 5: Moderate clarity | 6 – 7: High clarity

A score of 5 suggests you generally perceive political decisions as being explained fairly well and in a reasonably timely way, though some details or transparency may still feel insufficient.

example score

4/7

Interpersonal (I)

Measures how respectfully and politely political authorities communicate with citizens during decision-making processes.

Low respect

Mixed respect

High respect

1 – 3: Low respect | 4 – 5: Mixed respect | 6 – 7: High respect

A score of 4 suggests a mixed perception of interpersonal treatment, indicating respect is present but not consistently experienced.

example score

3/7

Procedural (P)

Measures how fair, consistent, and participatory the political decision-making process seems, including whether people feel they can influence decisions and are treated impartially.

Low perceived procedural fairness

Moderate perceived procedural fairness

High perceived procedural fairness

1 – 3: Low perceived procedural fairness | 3.1 – 5: Moderate perceived procedural fairness | 5.1 – 7: High perceived procedural fairness

A score of 3 indicates low perceived procedural fairness, suggesting the decision-making process is seen as not very impartial or open to meaningful citizen influence.

example score

5/7

Procedural Justice Total Score (PJTS)

This scale measures how fair, transparent, and consistently applied political decision-making procedures are perceived to be.

Low fairness

Moderate fairness

High fairness

1 – 3: Low fairness | 4 – 5: Moderate fairness | 6 – 7: High fairness

A score of 5 suggests a generally positive but not fully strong perception that political procedures are fair and transparent.

Start Online Test

just completed the test

DATA-BASED USER COHORTS

Who Usually Takes This Test?

Civically engaged voters

41%OF USERS

People who follow politics closely use it to check whether government decisions feel fair, transparent, and respectful.

Researchers and students

34%OF USERS

Social science students and researchers take it to measure procedural, informational, and interpersonal justice in surveys or focus groups.

Community advocates

25%OF USERS

Activists and local organizers use it to identify where institutions are losing trust and what communication or decision steps need improvement.

BASED ON AGGREGATED, ANONYMIZED DATA FROM TENS OF THOUSANDS OF FREUDLY USERS.

RESULTS YOU CAN ACTUALLY USE

Scale Results
— Explained Clearly

Your scores across each test scale are translated into plain, usable insights. You won’t just get numbers — you’ll learn how your results impact your daily life, emotional state, and overall well-being.

AI-Powered
Interpretation

You’ll receive a structured, clinically-grounded explanation. Our AI analyzes patterns and relationships between scales to provide a coherent interpretation, without exaggerated language.

Statistical
Comparison

See how your results compare to others. Anonymized platform data is used to create a percentile scale, which identifies whether your results are typical.

Practical
Recommendations

You’ll receive clear, actionable guidance tailored to your profile. These easy-to-implement suggestions focus on coping, self-regulation, and realistic next steps.

AI-Powered
Insights

Get insights on behavioral and thought patterns you might not notice on your own. By uncovering subtle connections between your responses, you’ll better understand what may be driving your current results.

Discuss with
an AI Therapist

Clarify, reflect, and explore your results right away. Talk through your experience, ask questions, and explore meanings in a calm, non-diagnostic dialogue.

Start Online Test

Used in 52+ countries

Benchmarking

See How You Compare

Once you complete the test, your results are compared with real-world data from people in your country.
Below is a preview of how scores are typically distributed across each scale.

Informational (I)

Average

3.3

Normal range

2.3 — 4.4

min.

max.

Majority

This curve shows how scores are typically distributed.
Once you complete the test, your result will appear on the scale so you can see how you compare.

Interpersonal (I)

Average

4.5

Normal range

3.5 — 5.4

min.

max.

Majority

This curve shows how scores are typically distributed.
Once you complete the test, your result will appear on the scale so you can see how you compare.

Procedural (P)

Average

4.4

Normal range

3.3 — 5.4

min.

max.

Majority

This curve shows how scores are typically distributed.
Once you complete the test, your result will appear on the scale so you can see how you compare.

Overall Procedural Justice Score (OPJS)

Average

4.6

Normal range

3.5 — 5.7

min.

max.

Majority

This curve shows how scores are typically distributed.
Once you complete the test, your result will appear on the scale so you can see how you compare.

Start Online Test

Featured On

CLEAR ANSWERS TO COMMON QUESTIONS

Frequently Asked Questions

What does this questionnaire measure?

It measures perceived fairness of political decision-making procedures. It covers procedural fairness, the quality of explanations, and respectful treatment by authorities.

What types of items are included?

Items ask about how consistent and unbiased procedures seem, how clear and timely information is, and how politely officials communicate. Responses reflect perceptions of process rather than policy outcomes.

How long does it take and how many questions are there?

It includes 15 questions and typically takes about 3 minutes to complete.

How should responses be selected?

Select the option that best matches typical experiences or general impressions. Use the full range of response options when appropriate.

How are results used?

Results summarize perceived fairness across multiple dimensions and can highlight areas of concern such as unclear explanations or disrespectful communication. They are intended for group-level monitoring and comparison over time.

WHAT THE TEST MEASURES

About This Assessment

Measuring Justice in the Political Sphere Test

Political Justice Scale Test - Symptoms and Signs

civil consciousness justice

In political contexts, perceptions of fairness and transparency in decision-making can shape trust and acceptance of outcomes. The Political Justice Scale is a brief self-report measure designed to assess perceived fairness of political decision-making processes.

The instrument consists of 15 items and typically requires about 3 minutes to complete. It is commonly used in research or program evaluation to characterize respondents’ perceptions across multiple facets of justice relevant to public institutions, including perceptions of procedural fairness, adequacy and clarity of explanations, and respectful interpersonal treatment. The Political Justice Scale was developed by John T. Jost and Tom R. Tyler.

Author: John T. Jost, Tom R. Tyler

Literature: Tyler, T. R. Why people obey the law. Princeton University Press. 2006.

Test Question Form