Prices
Tests
FAQ
How sessions work
en
es
Log inSign up

Love and Friendship Test

Learn your attachment style in love and friendship in about 4 minutes. Get clear insight for growth, better communication, and a strong framework for counseling conversations.
Start Online Test
Questions: 184 minutes
Hi! My name is Freudly, i am an AI therapist, I will give you an interpretation of the test after you complete it.
08:30
October 2, 2025
October 2, 2025
Material has been updated
10311 views
1309 completions
836 likes
Share
Scale Explorer
How the Scales are Structured
example score
4/8
Secure (S)
Measures the degree of secure (reliable) attachment reflected in dependability, openness, and comfort with vulnerability in close relationships.
Low security
Moderate security
High security
0 – 2: Low security | 3 – 5: Moderate security | 6 – 8: High security
A score of 4 suggests a moderate level of secure attachment, with some consistent capacity for openness and support alongside areas that may feel less steady under stress.
example score
2/8
Anxious (A)
Measures the tendency toward anxious attachment patterns such as fear of rejection, loneliness, and self-sacrificing behavior in close relationships.
Low
Moderate
High
0 – 2: Low | 3 – 5: Moderate | 6 – 8: High
A score of 2 indicates low anxious attachment tendencies, suggesting relatively little fear of rejection or overcompensating behavior in relationships.
example score
5/8
Anxious-Avoidant (A)
Measures the degree of ambivalence in close relationships, combining a desire for closeness with discomfort that leads to distancing and heightened insecurity.
Low
Moderate
High
0 – 2: Low | 3 – 5: Moderate | 6 – 8: High
A score of 5 suggests a moderate anxious-avoidant pattern, where closeness may be strongly desired but is often mixed with doubt, overanalysis, and periods of pulling away.
example score
7/8
Dismissive-Avoidant (D)
Measures the tendency to downplay closeness and rely on emotional or physical distance in relationships.
Low
Moderate
High
0 – 2: Low | 3 – 5: Moderate | 6 – 8: High
A score of 7 falls in the High range, suggesting a strong pattern of keeping emotional distance and finding closeness feel unsafe or uncomfortable.
Start Online Test
just completed the test
DATA-BASED USER COHORTS
Who Usually Takes This Test?
Couples in a rough patch
41%OF USERS
Partners take it together to understand recurring conflicts, reassurance needs, and distancing patterns so they can communicate more clearly.
Self-growth seekers
34%OF USERS
People take it solo to identify their attachment tendencies and learn what helps them feel safe and connected in close relationships.
Therapy and coaching clients
25%OF USERS
Clients use it with a counselor to name patterns from past experiences and guide practical goals for healthier bonds.
BASED ON AGGREGATED, ANONYMIZED DATA FROM TENS OF THOUSANDS OF FREUDLY USERS.
RESULTS YOU CAN ACTUALLY USE
What You’ll See After You Finish the Test
Scale Results
— Explained Clearly
Your scores across each test scale, translated into plain, usable insights. Not just numbers, but what they actually mean for your daily life, emotional state, and overall well-being.
AI-Powered
Interpretation
A structured, clinically grounded explanation. Our AI analyzes patterns and relationships between scales to provide a coherent interpretation — without alarmist language.
Statistical
Comparison
See how you compare to others. Your scores are placed in a statistical context, showing percentiles and trends based on anonymized platform data to help you understand what`s typical.
Practical
Recommendations
Actionable guidance tailored to your profile. Receive clear, realistic suggestions you can apply immediately — focused on coping, self-regulation, and realistic next steps.
AI-Detected
Insights
Key patterns you might not notice on your own. Surfacing subtle connections in your responses that help you better understand what may be driving your current results.
Discuss with
an AI Psychologist
Clarify, reflect, and explore right away. Talk through your outcomes, ask questions, and explore meanings in a calm, non-diagnostic dialogue environment.
Start Online Test
Used in 52+ countries
Benchmarking
See How You Compare
Once you finish the test, your results will be compared with real-world data from people in your country.
Below is a preview of the benchmarks we use to place your score in context.
Safe (reliable) (S()
Average
4.5
Normal range
3.1 — 5.9
min.
0
max.
8
majority
This curve shows how scores are typically distributed.
Once you complete the test, your result will appear here so you can see where you land.
Anxious (A)
Average
5.3
Normal range
3.9 — 6.7
min.
0
max.
8
majority
This curve shows how scores are typically distributed.
Once you complete the test, your result will appear here so you can see where you land.
Anxious-avoidant (A)
Average
5.3
Normal range
3.9 — 6.7
min.
0
max.
8
majority
This curve shows how scores are typically distributed.
Once you complete the test, your result will appear here so you can see where you land.
Avoidant-dismissive (A)
Average
6
Normal range
4.7 — 7.2
min.
0
max.
8
majority
This curve shows how scores are typically distributed.
Once you complete the test, your result will appear here so you can see where you land.
Start Online Test
Featured On
Rated 4.8/5 by Our Customers
“Freudly really helped me discover parts of my personality I hadn’t noticed before. It strengthened the areas where I needed to grow and made me feel more grounded and confident in the parts that already worked well.”
— Emma C., US
“I wanted to understand how serious my ADHD is, and now I finally do. I also realized I need to work on my self-esteem. It has been low for a long time, and that makes daily life harder than it should be.”
— Mateo R., CA
“Reading each question felt like someone really understood me. Even though I’ve already dealt with much of this, reflecting still helped me learn something new about myself.”
— Caroline F., US
“The process is simple. The test covers everything you need, and you’ll get a clear breakdown of your results. For just a few dollars, it’s a great value.”
— Klara N., CZ
“I kept thinking there might be a small chance, but now I know for sure. The questions were easy to understand, and the whole process was straightforward.”
— Bruno M., BR
“I really enjoyed this experience. I learned a lot, and it helped me make sense of my thoughts and the feeling I’ve had for a long time that I may have grown up with undiagnosed ADHD.”
— Alice B., FR
“Great platform — the insights were genuinely meaningful!”
— Daniel W., DE
“Everything was easy to follow. The tools you get at the end are genuinely helpful for self-growth, and the price is very reasonable. I really appreciate that.”
— Sofia M., ES
“Surprisingly accurate — honestly didn’t expect it to nail things so well.”
— Adir B., IL
“There are lots of different tests to pick from, and the price is surprisingly low for how much insight you get.”
— Olivia W., CA
“I was pleasantly surprised when I read the results. It was as if someone had sorted out my messy thoughts and given me useful tips to help me speak with more confidence.”
— Grace O., IE
“It was really solid, very detailed, and it actually helped me make sense of a lot of things.”
— Carla T., TT
“I was really impressed with the report. It was clear, thoughtful, and it reflected things I’ve been noticing about myself.”
— Jade H., US
“The questions made me think deeply and helped me become more self-aware.”
— Brooke S., US
“Reading through most of the questions made me feel understood. Although I’ve already worked through some of these issues, the questions still gave me useful insights and helped me learn more about myself.”
— Ryan M., US
“I usually take one or two tests each month, and this has become a good way for me to see how I’m doing.”
— Lucas W., US
“Most of the time, my results are in the 90 to 98th percentile compared to others. It really makes me feel like there’s something unique about me.”
— Ethan C., US
“I tried out some of the AI’s suggestions, and to be honest, they worked much better than I thought they would. Maybe this thing really is smarter than me.”
— Reece D., AU
Trusted by 22k+ Users Worldwide
CLEAR ANSWERS TO COMMON QUESTIONS
Frequently Asked Questions

Any questions left?

What does this test measure?
It screens for common attachment strategies in close relationships: secure, anxious, and avoidant. It summarizes patterns linked to emotional needs, boundaries, and responses to closeness and conflict.
How long does it take and how many items are included?
Estimated completion time is about 4 minutes. The questionnaire contains 18 items.
Who can take it?
It is appropriate for adults who want a brief overview of relationship patterns. It may be completed individually or separately by two people for comparison.
How should responses be selected?
Choose the option that best reflects typical behavior across recent close relationships. Avoid answering based on one unusual event or an idealized preference.
How should results be used in counseling or self-reflection?
Results provide a starting framework for discussing needs, triggers, and protective strategies. They do not replace diagnosis and should be interpreted alongside history and current context.
WHAT THE TEST MEASURES
About This Assessment
Love and Friendship Test

Love and Friendship Test

close relationshipsloveattachment

This measure is intended to support a brief self-report screening of interpersonal feelings and attitudes in close relationships. The Love and Friendship Test is commonly described as a quick questionnaire that can be used to facilitate discussion of relational patterns and perceived emotional connection. Rubin is cited in association with this instrument.

The measure includes 18 items and typically takes about 4 minutes to complete. Item content is generally oriented toward perceptions of closeness, affection, and friendship-related sentiments, and results are best interpreted as descriptive indicators rather than diagnostic conclusions.

In clinical or counseling contexts, the Love and Friendship Test may be used to structure conversation about relationship functioning, clarify themes relevant to treatment goals, and identify areas that warrant further assessment with validated measures and clinical interview.

Author: Zick Rubin
Literature: Hazan, C., & Shaver, P. R. Romantic love conceptualized as an attachment process. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 1987.
Test Question Form
Comments
Leave a Comment