Academic Achievement Goals Scale Test

Understand what drives a student’s learning goals and motivation in about 6 minutes. Get clear insights to tailor support, boost engagement, and reduce fear of failure with a quick 30 item check.

Start Online Test

Questions: 306 minutes

Hi! My name is Freudly, i am an AI therapist, I will give you an interpretation of the test after you complete it.

08:30

October 2, 2025

October 2, 2025
Material has been updated

October 2, 2025
Material has been published

16263 views

1853 completions

1538 likes

Scale Explorer

How the Scales are Structured

example score

12/20

Other-Avoidance Goals (OG)

Measures the extent to which a student is motivated to avoid looking worse than peers through social comparison.

Low avoidance

Moderate avoidance

High avoidance

5 – 9: Low avoidance | 10 – 14: Moderate avoidance | 15 – 20: High avoidance

A score of 12 falls in the Moderate avoidance range, suggesting occasional concern about not appearing worse than other students may influence motivation in evaluative situations.

example score

7/20

Other-Based Achievement (OA)

Measures how strongly a student is motivated to achieve academic success by outperforming others.

Low

Moderate

High

5 – 9: Low | 10 – 14: Moderate | 15 – 20: High

A score of 7 falls in the Low range, suggesting competition with peers is not a primary driver of your learning goals.

example score

12/20

Task-Avoidance Goals (TG)

Measures the extent to which a student is motivated to avoid mistakes and possible failure while completing academic tasks.

Low avoidance

Moderate avoidance

High avoidance

5 – 9: Low avoidance | 10 – 14: Moderate avoidance | 15 – 20: High avoidance

A score of 12 falls in the Moderate avoidance range, suggesting a noticeable but not dominant tendency to focus on preventing errors during task performance.

example score

15/20

Task-Approach Goals (TG)

Measures motivation to perform a specific academic task accurately and to a high standard.

Lower task-approach focus

Moderate task-approach focus

High task-approach focus

5 – 9: Lower task-approach focus | 10 – 15: Moderate task-approach focus | 16 – 20: High task-approach focus

A score of 15 indicates a moderate focus on completing academic tasks well, with generally steady but not consistently strong drive for high-quality performance.

example score

13/20

Self-Avoidance (S)

Measures the extent to which a student is motivated by avoiding doing worse than their own past performance or perceived potential.

Low avoidance

Moderate avoidance

High avoidance

5 – 9: Low avoidance | 10 – 14: Moderate avoidance | 15 – 20: High avoidance

A score of 13 falls in the Moderate avoidance range, suggesting a noticeable tendency to focus on not slipping below past results, which can be linked with increased sensitivity to personal setbacks.

example score

17/20

Personal Achievement (PA)

Measures how strongly a student is motivated to improve their own abilities and results compared with their past performance.

Low

Moderate

High

5 – 10: Low | 11 – 15: Moderate | 16 – 20: High

A score of 17 falls in the High range, suggesting a strong focus on personal growth and self-improvement in learning.

Start Online Test

just completed the test

DATA-BASED USER COHORTS

Who Usually Takes This Test?

Students boosting motivation

41%OF USERS

High school and university students take it to understand what drives their studying and how to set goals that keep them engaged.

Teachers and tutors

34%OF USERS

Educators use it to see whether a learner is focused on mastering the task, outperforming others, or avoiding mistakes, and adjust instruction accordingly.

School psychologists and counselors

25%OF USERS

Practitioners include it in assessments to identify achievement-goal patterns linked to anxiety, fear of failure, or low confidence and plan support.

BASED ON AGGREGATED, ANONYMIZED DATA FROM TENS OF THOUSANDS OF FREUDLY USERS.

RESULTS YOU CAN ACTUALLY USE

What You’ll See After You Finish the Test

Scale Results
— Explained Clearly

Your scores across each test scale, translated into plain, usable insights. Not just numbers, but what they actually mean for your daily life, emotional state, and overall well-being.

AI-Powered
Interpretation

A structured, clinically grounded explanation. Our AI analyzes patterns and relationships between scales to provide a coherent interpretation — without alarmist language.

Statistical
Comparison

See how you compare to others. Your scores are placed in a statistical context, showing percentiles and trends based on anonymized platform data to help you understand what`s typical.

Practical
Recommendations

Actionable guidance tailored to your profile. Receive clear, realistic suggestions you can apply immediately — focused on coping, self-regulation, and realistic next steps.

AI-Detected
Insights

Key patterns you might not notice on your own. Surfacing subtle connections in your responses that help you better understand what may be driving your current results.

Discuss with
an AI Psychologist

Clarify, reflect, and explore right away. Talk through your outcomes, ask questions, and explore meanings in a calm, non-diagnostic dialogue environment.

Start Online Test

Used in 52+ countries

Benchmarking

See How You Compare

Once you finish the test, your results will be compared with real-world data from people in your country.
Below is a preview of the benchmarks we use to place your score in context.

Avoidance in Comparison (AiC)

Average

8.8

Normal range

6.7 — 10.9

min.

max.

majority

This curve shows how scores are typically distributed.
Once you complete the test, your result will appear here so you can see where you land.

Achievement in Comparison (AiC)

Average

13.2

Normal range

10.5 — 15.9

min.

max.

majority

This curve shows how scores are typically distributed.
Once you complete the test, your result will appear here so you can see where you land.

Avoidance during task performance (Adtp)

Average

10.5

Normal range

8.6 — 12.3

min.

max.

majority

This curve shows how scores are typically distributed.
Once you complete the test, your result will appear here so you can see where you land.

Achievement upon task completion (Autc)

Average

14.5

Normal range

11.8 — 17.2

min.

max.

majority

This curve shows how scores are typically distributed.
Once you complete the test, your result will appear here so you can see where you land.

Personal Avoidance (PA)

Average

15.7

Normal range

13.5 — 18

min.

max.

majority

This curve shows how scores are typically distributed.
Once you complete the test, your result will appear here so you can see where you land.

Personal achievement (Pa)

Average

10.6

Normal range

8.5 — 12.6

min.

max.

majority

This curve shows how scores are typically distributed.
Once you complete the test, your result will appear here so you can see where you land.

Start Online Test

Featured On

Rated 4.8/5 by Our Customers

“Freudly really helped me discover parts of my personality I hadn’t noticed before. It strengthened the areas where I needed to grow and made me feel more grounded and confident in the parts that already worked well.”

— Emma C., US

“I wanted to understand how serious my ADHD is, and now I finally do. I also realized I need to work on my self-esteem. It has been low for a long time, and that makes daily life harder than it should be.”

— Mateo R., CA

“Reading each question felt like someone really understood me. Even though I’ve already dealt with much of this, reflecting still helped me learn something new about myself.”

— Caroline F., US

“The process is simple. The test covers everything you need, and you’ll get a clear breakdown of your results. For just a few dollars, it’s a great value.”

— Klara N., CZ

“I kept thinking there might be a small chance, but now I know for sure. The questions were easy to understand, and the whole process was straightforward.”

— Bruno M., BR

“I really enjoyed this experience. I learned a lot, and it helped me make sense of my thoughts and the feeling I’ve had for a long time that I may have grown up with undiagnosed ADHD.”

— Alice B., FR

“Great platform — the insights were genuinely meaningful!”

— Daniel W., DE

“Everything was easy to follow. The tools you get at the end are genuinely helpful for self-growth, and the price is very reasonable. I really appreciate that.”

— Sofia M., ES

“Surprisingly accurate — honestly didn’t expect it to nail things so well.”

— Adir B., IL

“There are lots of different tests to pick from, and the price is surprisingly low for how much insight you get.”

— Olivia W., CA

“I was pleasantly surprised when I read the results. It was as if someone had sorted out my messy thoughts and given me useful tips to help me speak with more confidence.”

— Grace O., IE

“It was really solid, very detailed, and it actually helped me make sense of a lot of things.”

— Carla T., TT

“I was really impressed with the report. It was clear, thoughtful, and it reflected things I’ve been noticing about myself.”

— Jade H., US

“The questions made me think deeply and helped me become more self-aware.”

— Brooke S., US

“Reading through most of the questions made me feel understood. Although I’ve already worked through some of these issues, the questions still gave me useful insights and helped me learn more about myself.”

— Ryan M., US

“I usually take one or two tests each month, and this has become a good way for me to see how I’m doing.”

— Lucas W., US

“Most of the time, my results are in the 90 to 98th percentile compared to others. It really makes me feel like there’s something unique about me.”

— Ethan C., US

“I tried out some of the AI’s suggestions, and to be honest, they worked much better than I thought they would. Maybe this thing really is smarter than me.”

— Reece D., AU

Trusted by 22k+ Users Worldwide

CLEAR ANSWERS TO COMMON QUESTIONS

Frequently Asked Questions

Any questions left?

What does this questionnaire measure?

It measures six types of achievement goals that influence learning. The scales reflect how goals are defined (self, task, or others) and whether motivation is approach-based or avoidance-based.

How long does it take to complete and how many items are included?

Completion typically takes about 6 minutes. The questionnaire contains 30 statements.

How should responses be selected?

Each statement is rated based on how well it matches current learning motives and goals. Responses should reflect typical patterns rather than a single unusual day.

What is the difference between approach and avoidance goals?

Approach goals focus on attaining a desired outcome, such as improvement or high performance. Avoidance goals focus on preventing failure, mistakes, or negative evaluation.

How are results used?

Results support interpretation of what motivates learning and which goal patterns are most prominent. They can inform educational planning, counseling, and targeted support for difficulties such as fear of mistakes or test anxiety.

WHAT THE TEST MEASURES

About This Assessment

Academic Achievement Goals Scale Test

academic motivation

Academic motivation can be clarified by assessing the types of achievement goals a student endorses. The Academic Achievement Goals Scale is a brief self-report measure of students’ goal orientations in academic contexts, based on the framework described by A. Elliot et al. (2011).

The instrument contains 30 items and typically requires about 6 minutes to complete. Respondents rate how well statements reflect their current motives and goals for learning, yielding scores that can be used to characterize patterns of approach- and avoidance-oriented goals across different standards for evaluating competence (e.g., self-referential, task-based, and normative comparisons).

In clinical, counseling, or educational settings, the Academic Achievement Goals Scale may help inform case formulation and intervention planning by identifying goal-related factors associated with engagement, performance concerns, and test anxiety. Results should be interpreted in conjunction with other clinical data (e.g., presenting concerns, academic history, and contextual stressors) rather than as a stand-alone indicator.

Author: A. Elliot et al. (2011)

Literature: Pintrich, P. R. A conceptual framework for assessing motivation and self-regulated learning in college students. Educational Psychology Review. 2004.; Elliot, A. J., Murayama, K., & Pekrun, R. A. A 3 × 2 achievement goal model. Journal of Educational Psychology. 2011.

Test Question Form