Class Group Reflexivity Test

In 4 minutes, understand how a class reflects on its interactions, tackles problems, and makes shared decisions. Fast 18-item results highlight tension points and strengths to guide support and teamwork.

Start Online Test

Questions: 184 minutes

Hi! My name is Freudly, i am an AI therapist, I will give you an interpretation of the test after you complete it.

08:30

October 2, 2025

October 2, 2025
Material has been updated

October 2, 2025
Material has been published

23,543 views

2,457 completions

2,187 likes

Verified by Daniel Hall

Psychologist with 25 years of experience

Scale Explorer

How the Scales are Structured

example score

24/30

Reflection on Past Experience (RoPE)

Measures how well the class collectively reflects on past experiences and uses lessons learned to improve collaboration.

Limited reflection

Developing reflection

Strong reflection

6 – 12: Limited reflection | 13 – 23: Developing reflection | 24 – 30: Strong reflection

A score of 24 indicates the class typically reviews past events realistically and applies those insights to improve how they work together.

example score

12/30

Appraisal of Group Resources and Capabilities (AoGRaC)

Measures how clearly the class recognizes and can draw on its collective resources and capabilities to achieve shared goals.

Low awareness

Moderate awareness

High awareness

6 – 12: Low awareness | 13 – 24: Moderate awareness | 25 – 30: High awareness

A score of 12 falls in the Low awareness range, suggesting the group may underestimate or have limited shared clarity about its strengths and resources.

example score

16/30

Meaning Analysis of Joint Activity (MAoJA)

Measures how well the class collectively understands and discusses the goals, tasks, and meaning of its collaborative work.

Low clarity

Moderate clarity

High clarity

6 – 12: Low clarity | 13 – 25: Moderate clarity | 26 – 30: High clarity

A score of 16 indicates a moderate level of shared understanding, suggesting the class can discuss the meaning of joint activity but may do so inconsistently or without full alignment.

example score

59/90

Group Reflexivity (GR)

Measures how well the class can collectively reflect on, discuss, and adjust its shared actions, goals, and relationships.

Low

Moderate

High

18 – 36: Low | 37 – 71: Moderate | 72 – 90: High

A score of 59 falls in the Moderate range, suggesting the group shows basic reflective processes but may be inconsistent in jointly analyzing experiences and making adjustments.

Start Online Test

just completed the test

DATA-BASED USER COHORTS

Who Usually Takes This Test?

School psychologists

41%OF USERS

They use it to quickly assess a class’s communication patterns, conflict handling, and readiness for joint decisions to plan targeted support.

Classroom teachers

34%OF USERS

They take it to understand how the class reflects on its behavior and where to focus work on cohesion, discipline, and collaboration.

Homeroom and counselors

25%OF USERS

They use it when onboarding new groups or after incidents to spot tension points and guide constructive discussion and team-building.

BASED ON AGGREGATED, ANONYMIZED DATA FROM TENS OF THOUSANDS OF FREUDLY USERS.

RESULTS YOU CAN ACTUALLY USE

Scale Results
— Explained Clearly

Your scores across each test scale are translated into plain, usable insights. You won’t just get numbers — you’ll learn how your results impact your daily life, emotional state, and overall well-being.

AI-Powered
Interpretation

You’ll receive a structured, clinically-grounded explanation. Our AI analyzes patterns and relationships between scales to provide a coherent interpretation, without exaggerated language.

Statistical
Comparison

See how your results compare to others. Anonymized platform data is used to create a percentile scale, which identifies whether your results are typical.

Practical
Recommendations

You’ll receive clear, actionable guidance tailored to your profile. These easy-to-implement suggestions focus on coping, self-regulation, and realistic next steps.

AI-Powered
Insights

Get insights on behavioral and thought patterns you might not notice on your own. By uncovering subtle connections between your responses, you’ll better understand what may be driving your current results.

Discuss with
an AI Therapist

Clarify, reflect, and explore your results right away. Talk through your experience, ask questions, and explore meanings in a calm, non-diagnostic dialogue.

Start Online Test

Used in 52+ countries

Benchmarking

See How You Compare

Once you complete the test, your results are compared with real-world data from people in your country.
Below is a preview of how scores are typically distributed across each scale.

Reflecting on Past Experiences (RoPE)

Average

21.5

Normal range

18.1 — 25

min.

max.

Majority

This curve shows how scores are typically distributed.
Once you complete the test, your result will appear on the scale so you can see how you compare.

Assessment of Group Resources and Capabilities (AoGRaC)

Average

17.7

Normal range

14.7 — 20.8

min.

max.

Majority

This curve shows how scores are typically distributed.
Once you complete the test, your result will appear on the scale so you can see how you compare.

Analysis of the Meaning of Collaborative Activity (AotMoCA)

Average

Normal range

19.9 — 28

min.

max.

Majority

This curve shows how scores are typically distributed.
Once you complete the test, your result will appear on the scale so you can see how you compare.

Group Reflexivity (GR)

Average

46.2

Normal range

32.8 — 59.6

min.

max.

Majority

This curve shows how scores are typically distributed.
Once you complete the test, your result will appear on the scale so you can see how you compare.

Start Online Test

Featured On

CLEAR ANSWERS TO COMMON QUESTIONS

Frequently Asked Questions

What does this questionnaire measure?

It measures how well a class can jointly reflect on its interactions, discuss difficulties, and make group decisions.

Who is this questionnaire intended for?

It is designed for adolescent classroom groups in regular school settings. It can be used with both open groups and relatively stable, semi-closed groups.

How long does it take and how many items are included?

It takes about 4 minutes to complete. It includes 18 items.

How should items be answered?

Each item should be answered based on typical class behavior, not a single event. Responses should reflect the group as a whole rather than individual preferences.

How are results used?

Results provide an overview of group communication and reflection strengths and potential problem areas. They can guide planning for class support, skills training, or conflict-prevention work.

WHAT THE TEST MEASURES

About This Assessment

Class Group Reflexivity Test - Symptoms and Signs

class climate reflection

This measure is used in school and adolescent group settings to examine how students collectively think about and evaluate their shared interactions and processes. Class Group Reflexivity provides a brief self-report index of perceived group-level reflection, including the extent to which the class discusses challenges, considers different perspectives, and coordinates decisions.

The questionnaire includes 18 items and typically requires about 4 minutes to complete. Items are phrased to capture the group’s capacity to notice and talk about interpersonal dynamics and task-related functioning, which can inform hypothesis generation and planning for class-based supports or consultation. Authorship is attributed to C. S. Carver and M. F. Scheier.

Scores from Class Group Reflexivity are generally interpreted as reflecting the class’s perceived ability to engage in collective self-appraisal and to use reflection to guide behavior, particularly in situations involving conflict, change, or coordination demands. Results should be considered alongside other sources of information (e.g., teacher observations, interviews, and contextual factors) when forming clinical or educational recommendations.

Author: C. S. Carver, M. F. Scheier

Literature: West, M. A. Reflexivity, revolution and innovation in work teams. In M. M. Beyerlein, D. A. Johnson, & S. T. Beyerlein (Eds.), Advances in interdisciplinary studies of work teams: Team performance assessment and measurement. JAI Press. 2000.; Sonnentag, S. Time in organizational research: Catching up on a long neglected topic in order to improve theory. Organizational Psychology Review. 2012.

Test Question Form