Home
Psychological tests
Executive Functioning Style Assessment

Executive Functioning Style Assessment Test

Understand how you get things done and how adaptable your approach is in about 7 minutes. Get a clear execution profile to align roles, boost efficiency, and pinpoint support needs.

Start Online Test

Questions: 367 minutes

Hi! My name is Freudly, i am an AI therapist, I will give you an interpretation of the test after you complete it.

08:30

October 2, 2025

October 2, 2025
Material has been updated

October 2, 2025
Material has been published

19380 views

2386 completions

1999 likes

Scale Explorer

How the Scales are Structured

example score

3/18

Situational Style (SS)

Measures how much a person adapts their execution methods and priorities to the situation, sometimes with reduced structure and accountability.

Low situationality

Moderate situationality

High situationality

0 – 5: Low situationality | 6 – 11: Moderate situationality | 12 – 18: High situationality

A score of 3 falls in the Low situationality range, suggesting a more consistent and structured approach with less tendency to change methods on the fly.

example score

5/18

Volitional Style (VS)

This scale measures persistence and the ability to mobilize willpower to overcome obstacles while pursuing goals.

Low

Moderate

High

0 – 5: Low | 6 – 11: Moderate | 12 – 18: High

A score of 5 falls in the Low range, suggesting willpower and persistence may be less consistently engaged when facing difficulties.

example score

7/18

Executive Style (ES)

Measures preference for disciplined compliance with external instructions and authority when executing tasks.

Low compliance

Moderate compliance

High compliance

0 – 5: Low compliance | 6 – 11: Moderate compliance | 12 – 18: High compliance

A score of 7 indicates a moderate tendency to follow instructions and external requirements while retaining some room for independent adjustment.

example score

14/18

Responsible Style (RS)

Measures the extent to which a person relies on duty, conscience, and personal accountability to plan, organize, and follow through on tasks.

Low

Moderate

High

0 – 5: Low | 6 – 11: Moderate | 12 – 18: High

A score of 14 falls in the High range, suggesting a strong tendency to take personal responsibility, make independent decisions, and follow through on obligations.

Start Online Test

just completed the test

DATA-BASED USER COHORTS

Who Usually Takes This Test?

Team leads and managers

41%OF USERS

They use it to understand how different people execute tasks so they can assign work better and spot where coaching or support is needed.

HR and talent specialists

34%OF USERS

They take it to quickly profile execution styles for hiring, role fit, team composition, and development planning.

Ambitious individual contributors

25%OF USERS

They want to clarify their default way of getting things done and learn how to be more flexible across changing demands.

BASED ON AGGREGATED, ANONYMIZED DATA FROM TENS OF THOUSANDS OF FREUDLY USERS.

RESULTS YOU CAN ACTUALLY USE

What You’ll See After You Finish the Test

Scale Results
— Explained Clearly

Your scores across each test scale, translated into plain, usable insights. Not just numbers, but what they actually mean for your daily life, emotional state, and overall well-being.

AI-Powered
Interpretation

A structured, clinically grounded explanation. Our AI analyzes patterns and relationships between scales to provide a coherent interpretation — without alarmist language.

Statistical
Comparison

See how you compare to others. Your scores are placed in a statistical context, showing percentiles and trends based on anonymized platform data to help you understand what`s typical.

Practical
Recommendations

Actionable guidance tailored to your profile. Receive clear, realistic suggestions you can apply immediately — focused on coping, self-regulation, and realistic next steps.

AI-Detected
Insights

Key patterns you might not notice on your own. Surfacing subtle connections in your responses that help you better understand what may be driving your current results.

Discuss with
an AI Psychologist

Clarify, reflect, and explore right away. Talk through your outcomes, ask questions, and explore meanings in a calm, non-diagnostic dialogue environment.

Start Online Test

Used in 52+ countries

Benchmarking

See How You Compare

Once you finish the test, your results will be compared with real-world data from people in your country.
Below is a preview of the benchmarks we use to place your score in context.

Situational style (Ss)

Average

7.1

Normal range

4.6 — 9.5

min.

max.

majority

This curve shows how scores are typically distributed.
Once you complete the test, your result will appear here so you can see where you land.

Volitional style (Vs)

Average

11.8

Normal range

8.7 — 14.8

min.

max.

majority

This curve shows how scores are typically distributed.
Once you complete the test, your result will appear here so you can see where you land.

Performance Style (PS)

Average

9.9

Normal range

6.9 — 13

min.

max.

majority

This curve shows how scores are typically distributed.
Once you complete the test, your result will appear here so you can see where you land.

Responsible style (Rs)

Average

12.8

Normal range

9.9 — 15.8

min.

max.

majority

This curve shows how scores are typically distributed.
Once you complete the test, your result will appear here so you can see where you land.

Start Online Test

Featured On

Rated 4.8/5 by Our Customers

“Freudly really helped me discover parts of my personality I hadn’t noticed before. It strengthened the areas where I needed to grow and made me feel more grounded and confident in the parts that already worked well.”

— Emma C., US

“I wanted to understand how serious my ADHD is, and now I finally do. I also realized I need to work on my self-esteem. It has been low for a long time, and that makes daily life harder than it should be.”

— Mateo R., CA

“Reading each question felt like someone really understood me. Even though I’ve already dealt with much of this, reflecting still helped me learn something new about myself.”

— Caroline F., US

“The process is simple. The test covers everything you need, and you’ll get a clear breakdown of your results. For just a few dollars, it’s a great value.”

— Klara N., CZ

“I kept thinking there might be a small chance, but now I know for sure. The questions were easy to understand, and the whole process was straightforward.”

— Bruno M., BR

“I really enjoyed this experience. I learned a lot, and it helped me make sense of my thoughts and the feeling I’ve had for a long time that I may have grown up with undiagnosed ADHD.”

— Alice B., FR

“Great platform — the insights were genuinely meaningful!”

— Daniel W., DE

“Everything was easy to follow. The tools you get at the end are genuinely helpful for self-growth, and the price is very reasonable. I really appreciate that.”

— Sofia M., ES

“Surprisingly accurate — honestly didn’t expect it to nail things so well.”

— Adir B., IL

“There are lots of different tests to pick from, and the price is surprisingly low for how much insight you get.”

— Olivia W., CA

“I was pleasantly surprised when I read the results. It was as if someone had sorted out my messy thoughts and given me useful tips to help me speak with more confidence.”

— Grace O., IE

“It was really solid, very detailed, and it actually helped me make sense of a lot of things.”

— Carla T., TT

“I was really impressed with the report. It was clear, thoughtful, and it reflected things I’ve been noticing about myself.”

— Jade H., US

“The questions made me think deeply and helped me become more self-aware.”

— Brooke S., US

“Reading through most of the questions made me feel understood. Although I’ve already worked through some of these issues, the questions still gave me useful insights and helped me learn more about myself.”

— Ryan M., US

“I usually take one or two tests each month, and this has become a good way for me to see how I’m doing.”

— Lucas W., US

“Most of the time, my results are in the 90 to 98th percentile compared to others. It really makes me feel like there’s something unique about me.”

— Ethan C., US

“I tried out some of the AI’s suggestions, and to be honest, they worked much better than I thought they would. Maybe this thing really is smarter than me.”

— Reece D., AU

Trusted by 22k+ Users Worldwide

CLEAR ANSWERS TO COMMON QUESTIONS

Frequently Asked Questions

Any questions left?

What does this questionnaire measure?

It measures preferred ways of completing tasks and the degree of flexibility in approach. It identifies four execution styles: Responsible, Executing, Willful, and Situational.

How long does it take and how many items are included?

Typical completion time is about 7 minutes. The questionnaire includes 36 items.

What do the four styles mean?

Responsible reflects planning, clear organization, and follow-through; Executing reflects precise completion of assigned tasks. Willful reflects persistence under difficulty; Situational reflects adapting methods and priorities to changing conditions.

How should items be answered?

Select the response that best reflects typical behavior across work and everyday situations. Answer all items and avoid overthinking single questions.

How are results used?

Results describe the predominant style and how execution may shift across situations. Findings can support task assignment, workload planning, and identification of areas where added structure or flexibility may improve effectiveness.

WHAT THE TEST MEASURES

About This Assessment

Executive Functioning Style Assessment Test

responsibility

This measure is designed to characterize an individual’s typical approach to planning, organizing, and adapting while completing tasks. The Executive Functioning Style Assessment is a brief self-report questionnaire intended to support a structured description of executive functioning style in everyday or work-related contexts.

The instrument includes 36 items and typically takes about 7 minutes to complete. Items are used to summarize patterns related to organization, task persistence, and flexibility, and results are generally interpreted as reflecting relative tendencies across different executive style domains rather than performance capacity. The Executive Functioning Style Assessment is cited in association with Gerard A. Gioia and Peter K. Isquith.

Author: Gerard A. Gioia, Peter K. Isquith

Literature: Goldberg, L. R. The development of markers for the Big-Five factor structure. Psychological Assessment. 1992.

Test Question Form