Prices
Tests
FAQ
How sessions work
en
es
Log inSign up

Metacognitive Processes Intensity Scale Test

See how well you monitor and manage your thinking in about 6 minutes. Get clear results across key areas to target coaching, boost decisions, and sharpen information handling.
Start Online Test
Questions: 316 minutes
Hi! My name is Freudly, i am an AI therapist, I will give you an interpretation of the test after you complete it.
08:30
October 2, 2025
October 2, 2025
Material has been updated
30001 view
2056 completions
1728 likes
Share
Scale Explorer
How the Scales are Structured
example score
170/217
Metacognitive Process Intensity (MPI)
Measures how strongly a person can monitor, evaluate, and regulate their own thinking processes.
Low
Moderate
High
31 – 93: Low | 94 – 155: Moderate | 156 – 217: High
A score of 170 falls in the High range, suggesting well-developed metacognitive skills such as planning, reflection, and self-regulation during thinking and decision-making.
Start Online Test
just completed the test
DATA-BASED USER COHORTS
Who Usually Takes This Test?
Managers and team leads
41%OF USERS
They take it to understand how well they plan, monitor, and adjust their thinking while making decisions and leading others.
Students and early-career pros
34%OF USERS
They use it to spot strengths and gaps in learning strategies, focus, and self-checking to improve study and work performance.
Psychologists and HR specialists
25%OF USERS
They take it to assess metacognitive skills for coaching, selection, or development programs and to track progress over time.
BASED ON AGGREGATED, ANONYMIZED DATA FROM TENS OF THOUSANDS OF FREUDLY USERS.
RESULTS YOU CAN ACTUALLY USE
What You’ll See After You Finish the Test
Scale Results
— Explained Clearly
Your scores across each test scale, translated into plain, usable insights. Not just numbers, but what they actually mean for your daily life, emotional state, and overall well-being.
AI-Powered
Interpretation
A structured, clinically grounded explanation. Our AI analyzes patterns and relationships between scales to provide a coherent interpretation — without alarmist language.
Statistical
Comparison
See how you compare to others. Your scores are placed in a statistical context, showing percentiles and trends based on anonymized platform data to help you understand what`s typical.
Practical
Recommendations
Actionable guidance tailored to your profile. Receive clear, realistic suggestions you can apply immediately — focused on coping, self-regulation, and realistic next steps.
AI-Detected
Insights
Key patterns you might not notice on your own. Surfacing subtle connections in your responses that help you better understand what may be driving your current results.
Discuss with
an AI Psychologist
Clarify, reflect, and explore right away. Talk through your outcomes, ask questions, and explore meanings in a calm, non-diagnostic dialogue environment.
Start Online Test
Used in 52+ countries
Benchmarking
See How You Compare
Once you finish the test, your results will be compared with real-world data from people in your country.
Below is a preview of the benchmarks we use to place your score in context.
The degree of metacognitive process expression (Tdompe)
Average
86.2
Normal range
55.6 — 116.8
min.
31
max.
217
majority
This curve shows how scores are typically distributed.
Once you complete the test, your result will appear here so you can see where you land.
Start Online Test
Featured On
Rated 4.8/5 by Our Customers
“Freudly really helped me discover parts of my personality I hadn’t noticed before. It strengthened the areas where I needed to grow and made me feel more grounded and confident in the parts that already worked well.”
— Emma C., US
“I wanted to understand how serious my ADHD is, and now I finally do. I also realized I need to work on my self-esteem. It has been low for a long time, and that makes daily life harder than it should be.”
— Mateo R., CA
“Reading each question felt like someone really understood me. Even though I’ve already dealt with much of this, reflecting still helped me learn something new about myself.”
— Caroline F., US
“The process is simple. The test covers everything you need, and you’ll get a clear breakdown of your results. For just a few dollars, it’s a great value.”
— Klara N., CZ
“I kept thinking there might be a small chance, but now I know for sure. The questions were easy to understand, and the whole process was straightforward.”
— Bruno M., BR
“I really enjoyed this experience. I learned a lot, and it helped me make sense of my thoughts and the feeling I’ve had for a long time that I may have grown up with undiagnosed ADHD.”
— Alice B., FR
“Great platform — the insights were genuinely meaningful!”
— Daniel W., DE
“Everything was easy to follow. The tools you get at the end are genuinely helpful for self-growth, and the price is very reasonable. I really appreciate that.”
— Sofia M., ES
“Surprisingly accurate — honestly didn’t expect it to nail things so well.”
— Adir B., IL
“There are lots of different tests to pick from, and the price is surprisingly low for how much insight you get.”
— Olivia W., CA
“I was pleasantly surprised when I read the results. It was as if someone had sorted out my messy thoughts and given me useful tips to help me speak with more confidence.”
— Grace O., IE
“It was really solid, very detailed, and it actually helped me make sense of a lot of things.”
— Carla T., TT
“I was really impressed with the report. It was clear, thoughtful, and it reflected things I’ve been noticing about myself.”
— Jade H., US
“The questions made me think deeply and helped me become more self-aware.”
— Brooke S., US
“Reading through most of the questions made me feel understood. Although I’ve already worked through some of these issues, the questions still gave me useful insights and helped me learn more about myself.”
— Ryan M., US
“I usually take one or two tests each month, and this has become a good way for me to see how I’m doing.”
— Lucas W., US
“Most of the time, my results are in the 90 to 98th percentile compared to others. It really makes me feel like there’s something unique about me.”
— Ethan C., US
“I tried out some of the AI’s suggestions, and to be honest, they worked much better than I thought they would. Maybe this thing really is smarter than me.”
— Reece D., AU
Trusted by 22k+ Users Worldwide
CLEAR ANSWERS TO COMMON QUESTIONS
Frequently Asked Questions

Any questions left?

What does this questionnaire measure?
It measures how strongly metacognitive processes are expressed in thinking and information handling. Results include an overall score and scores across eight subsystems.
Which version should be used?
Use the comprehensive version for general informational activity and profiling. Use the management version or the management research form when the focus is decision making and self-regulation in managerial work.
How long does it take and how many items are included?
Completion time is about 6 minutes. The questionnaire includes 31 items.
How should responses be selected?
Select the option that best matches typical behavior, not rare situations. Use the first answer that fits and avoid extended reconsideration.
How should results be used?
Results support identifying strengths and areas for development in planning, monitoring, and control of thinking. They can guide training goals, coaching targets, and selection of development activities.
WHAT THE TEST MEASURES
About This Assessment
Degree of Metacognitive Processes Expression Test

Metacognitive Processes Intensity Scale Test

metacognition

This self-report measure assesses the intensity of metacognitive processes involved in monitoring, evaluating, and regulating one’s thinking and information processing. The Metacognitive Processes Intensity Scale provides a brief profile of perceived metacognitive activity across multiple domains relevant to cognitive self-regulation (Wells).

It contains 31 items and typically takes about 6 minutes to complete. Results are intended to support descriptive assessment of individual differences in metacognitive processing intensity; the Metacognitive Processes Intensity Scale may be used in clinical, coaching, or research contexts as an adjunct to broader evaluation, with interpretation guided by the respondent’s context and other assessment data.

Author: Adrian F. Wells
Literature: Flavell, J. H. Metacognition and cognitive monitoring: A new area of cognitive-developmental inquiry. American Psychologist. 1979.; Schraw, G., & Dennison, R. S. Assessing metacognitive awareness. Contemporary Educational Psychology. 1994.; Nelson, T. O., & Narens, L. Metamemory: A theoretical framework and new findings. In G. H. Bower (Ed.), The psychology of learning and motivation. Academic Press. 1990.
Test Question Form
You Might Also Like
Internalized Stigma of Mental Illness Scale (ISMI-9)
This brief self-report measure assesses the extent to which an individual h…
Start Test
Verbalization Tendency Severity Scale
This measure evaluates individual differences in the tendency to translate…
Start Test
Procrastination Severity Scale
This brief self-report measure screens for the severity of habitual delay i…
Start Test
Comments
Leave a Comment