Combat Exposure Scale (CES) Test

Understand the intensity of a veteran’s combat exposure in about 2 minutes. Seven items yield a clear score to guide PTSD care and prioritize treatment targets.

Start Online Test

Questions: 72 minutes

Hi! My name is Freudly, i am an AI therapist, I will give you an interpretation of the test after you complete it.

08:30

October 2, 2025

October 2, 2025
Material has been updated

October 2, 2025
Material has been published

15197 views

1219 completions

1042 likes

Scale Explorer

How the Scales are Structured

example score

12/26

Combat Exposure Intensity (CEI)

Measures the quantitative intensity of an individual’s exposure to combat-related events and stressors.

Low exposure

Moderate exposure

High exposure

0 – 8: Low exposure | 9 – 17: Moderate exposure | 18 – 26: High exposure

A score of 12 indicates a moderate level of combat exposure, suggesting a noticeable but not extreme intensity of combat-related experiences.

Start Online Test

just completed the test

DATA-BASED USER COHORTS

Who Usually Takes This Test?

Veterans with PTSD symptoms

44%OF USERS

People who served in combat and now have anxiety, nightmares, or intrusive memories use it to gauge how intense their frontline exposure was.

Therapists and clinicians

33%OF USERS

Mental health professionals use it to get a structured measure of combat stressors to guide trauma-focused assessment and treatment planning.

Active-duty service members

23%OF USERS

Military personnel returning from deployments take it to document recent combat exposure and flag potential need for follow-up support.

BASED ON AGGREGATED, ANONYMIZED DATA FROM TENS OF THOUSANDS OF FREUDLY USERS.

RESULTS YOU CAN ACTUALLY USE

What You’ll See After You Finish the Test

Scale Results
— Explained Clearly

Your scores across each test scale, translated into plain, usable insights. Not just numbers, but what they actually mean for your daily life, emotional state, and overall well-being.

AI-Powered
Interpretation

A structured, clinically grounded explanation. Our AI analyzes patterns and relationships between scales to provide a coherent interpretation — without alarmist language.

Statistical
Comparison

See how you compare to others. Your scores are placed in a statistical context, showing percentiles and trends based on anonymized platform data to help you understand what`s typical.

Practical
Recommendations

Actionable guidance tailored to your profile. Receive clear, realistic suggestions you can apply immediately — focused on coping, self-regulation, and realistic next steps.

AI-Detected
Insights

Key patterns you might not notice on your own. Surfacing subtle connections in your responses that help you better understand what may be driving your current results.

Discuss with
an AI Psychologist

Clarify, reflect, and explore right away. Talk through your outcomes, ask questions, and explore meanings in a calm, non-diagnostic dialogue environment.

Start Online Test

Used in 52+ countries

Benchmarking

See How You Compare

Once you finish the test, your results will be compared with real-world data from people in your country.
Below is a preview of the benchmarks we use to place your score in context.

Combat Experience Intensity Scale (CEIS)

Average

Normal range

13.6 — 22.5

min.

max.

majority

This curve shows how scores are typically distributed.
Once you complete the test, your result will appear here so you can see where you land.

Start Online Test

Featured On

Rated 4.8/5 by Our Customers

“Freudly really helped me discover parts of my personality I hadn’t noticed before. It strengthened the areas where I needed to grow and made me feel more grounded and confident in the parts that already worked well.”

— Emma C., US

“I wanted to understand how serious my ADHD is, and now I finally do. I also realized I need to work on my self-esteem. It has been low for a long time, and that makes daily life harder than it should be.”

— Mateo R., CA

“Reading each question felt like someone really understood me. Even though I’ve already dealt with much of this, reflecting still helped me learn something new about myself.”

— Caroline F., US

“The process is simple. The test covers everything you need, and you’ll get a clear breakdown of your results. For just a few dollars, it’s a great value.”

— Klara N., CZ

“I kept thinking there might be a small chance, but now I know for sure. The questions were easy to understand, and the whole process was straightforward.”

— Bruno M., BR

“I really enjoyed this experience. I learned a lot, and it helped me make sense of my thoughts and the feeling I’ve had for a long time that I may have grown up with undiagnosed ADHD.”

— Alice B., FR

“Great platform — the insights were genuinely meaningful!”

— Daniel W., DE

“Everything was easy to follow. The tools you get at the end are genuinely helpful for self-growth, and the price is very reasonable. I really appreciate that.”

— Sofia M., ES

“Surprisingly accurate — honestly didn’t expect it to nail things so well.”

— Adir B., IL

“There are lots of different tests to pick from, and the price is surprisingly low for how much insight you get.”

— Olivia W., CA

“I was pleasantly surprised when I read the results. It was as if someone had sorted out my messy thoughts and given me useful tips to help me speak with more confidence.”

— Grace O., IE

“It was really solid, very detailed, and it actually helped me make sense of a lot of things.”

— Carla T., TT

“I was really impressed with the report. It was clear, thoughtful, and it reflected things I’ve been noticing about myself.”

— Jade H., US

“The questions made me think deeply and helped me become more self-aware.”

— Brooke S., US

“Reading through most of the questions made me feel understood. Although I’ve already worked through some of these issues, the questions still gave me useful insights and helped me learn more about myself.”

— Ryan M., US

“I usually take one or two tests each month, and this has become a good way for me to see how I’m doing.”

— Lucas W., US

“Most of the time, my results are in the 90 to 98th percentile compared to others. It really makes me feel like there’s something unique about me.”

— Ethan C., US

“I tried out some of the AI’s suggestions, and to be honest, they worked much better than I thought they would. Maybe this thing really is smarter than me.”

— Reece D., AU

Trusted by 22k+ Users Worldwide

CLEAR ANSWERS TO COMMON QUESTIONS

Frequently Asked Questions

Any questions left?

What does this questionnaire measure?

It estimates the intensity and frequency of exposure to combat-related stressors. The score summarizes reported exposure across several common combat situations.

Who is this questionnaire intended for?

It is intended for adults with military service who experienced deployment or combat-zone conditions. It may be used in clinical evaluation or research involving trauma-related outcomes.

How long does it take and how many items are included?

It includes 7 items and typically takes about 2 minutes to complete. Items focus on specific types of combat events.

How should responses be selected if details are unclear?

Select the response that best matches overall experience during the relevant service period. If an event did not occur, select the option indicating no exposure.

How are results used and what are the limits of interpretation?

Results support clinical case formulation and treatment planning by describing level of combat exposure. The score does not diagnose any condition and should be interpreted alongside other clinical information.

WHAT THE TEST MEASURES

About This Assessment

Combat Exposure Scale (CES) Test

ptsd occupational psychology

This measure provides a brief, structured estimate of an individual’s level of wartime operational stress exposure. The Combat Exposure Scale (CES) is commonly used in clinical and research settings to quantify the severity and frequency of combat-related events based on self-report.

It contains 7 items and typically takes about 2 minutes to complete. Items focus on concrete experiences (e.g., exposure to enemy fire, direct engagement, and related combat situations), yielding a score that can support case formulation, trauma-focused assessment, and interpretation of posttraumatic stress–related presentations. The Combat Exposure Scale (CES) is attributed to Charles W. Hoge and Matthew J. Friedman.

Author: Charles W. Hoge, Matthew J. Friedman

Literature: Keane, T. M., Fairbank, J. A., Caddell, J. M., Zimering, R. T., Taylor, K. L., & Mora, C. A. Clinical evaluation of a measure to assess combat exposure. Psychological Assessment. 1989.

Test Question Form