Working Alliance Inventory–Short Form (WAI-S) Test

Understand how strong the therapist client bond feels in about 2 minutes. Ten quick items support side by side feedback to spot gaps early and keep care aligned.
Start Online Test
Questions102 minutes
Hi! My name is Freudly, i am an AI therapist, I will give you an interpretation of the test after you complete it.
08:30
October 2, 2025
October 2, 2025
Material has been updated
22897 views
2341 completion
1877 likes
Share
Scale Explorer
How the Scales are Structured
example score
45/70
Therapeutic Alliance (TA)
Measures the strength of the working relationship between client and therapist, including agreement on goals and tasks and the emotional bond.
Low alliance
Moderate alliance
High alliance
1034Low alliance3554Moderate alliance5570High alliance
A score of 45 indicates a moderate therapeutic alliance, suggesting a generally workable connection with some areas that may benefit from further alignment or discussion.
Start Online Test
just completed the test
DATA-BASED USER COHORTS
Who Usually Takes This Test?
Practicing psychotherapists
46%OF USERS
Therapists use it to quickly check how aligned they are with a client on goals, tasks, and emotional connection, especially when progress stalls.
Clients in ongoing therapy
34%OF USERS
Clients take it to express whether they feel understood, supported, and working toward shared goals with their therapist.
Supervisors and trainees
20%OF USERS
Supervisors and early-career clinicians use it to track alliance quality over time and spot relationship issues that need discussion.
BASED ON AGGREGATED, ANONYMIZED DATA FROM TENS OF THOUSANDS OF FREUDLY USERS.
RESULTS YOU CAN ACTUALLY USE
What You’ll See After You Finish the Test
Scale Results
— Explained Clearly
Your scores across each test scale, translated into plain, usable insights. Not just numbers, but what they actually mean for your daily life, emotional state, and overall well-being.
AI-Powered
Interpretation
A structured, clinically grounded explanation. Our AI analyzes patterns and relationships between scales to provide a coherent interpretation — without alarmist language.
Statistical
Comparison
See how you compare to others. Your scores are placed in a statistical context, showing percentiles and trends based on anonymized platform data to help you understand what`s typical.
Practical
Recommendations
Actionable guidance tailored to your profile. Receive clear, realistic suggestions you can apply immediately — focused on coping, self-regulation, and realistic next steps.
AI-Detected
Insights
Key patterns you might not notice on your own. Surfacing subtle connections in your responses that help you better understand what may be driving your current results.
Discuss with
an AI Psychologist
Clarify, reflect, and explore right away. Talk through your outcomes, ask questions, and explore meanings in a calm, non-diagnostic dialogue environment.
Start Online Test
Used in 52+ countries
Benchmarking
See How You Compare
Once you finish the test, your results will be compared with real-world data from people in your country.
Below is a preview of the benchmarks we use to place your score in context.
Therapeutic Alliance Scale (TAS)
Average
45.4
Normal range
34.356.5
min.
10
max.
70
majority
This curve shows how scores are typically distributed.
Once you complete the test, your result will appear here so you can see where you land.
Featured On
Rated 4.8/5 by Our Customers
Freudly really helped me discover parts of my personality I hadn’t noticed before. It strengthened the areas where I needed to grow and made me feel more grounded and confident in the parts that already worked well.
Emma C., US
I wanted to understand how serious my ADHD is, and now I finally do. I also realized I need to work on my self-esteem. It has been low for a long time, and that makes daily life harder than it should be.
Mateo R., CA
Reading each question felt like someone really understood me. Even though I’ve already dealt with much of this, reflecting still helped me learn something new about myself.
Caroline F., US
The process is simple. The test covers everything you need, and you’ll get a clear breakdown of your results. For just a few dollars, it’s a great value.
Klara N., CZ
I kept thinking there might be a small chance, but now I know for sure. The questions were easy to understand, and the whole process was straightforward.
Bruno M., BR
I really enjoyed this experience. I learned a lot, and it helped me make sense of my thoughts and the feeling I’ve had for a long time that I may have grown up with undiagnosed ADHD.
Alice B., FR
Great platform — the insights were genuinely meaningful!
Daniel W., DE
Everything was easy to follow. The tools you get at the end are genuinely helpful for self-growth, and the price is very reasonable. I really appreciate that.
Sofia M., ES
Surprisingly accurate — honestly didn’t expect it to nail things so well.
Adir B., IL
There are lots of different tests to pick from, and the price is surprisingly low for how much insight you get.
Olivia W., CA
I was pleasantly surprised when I read the results. It was as if someone had sorted out my messy thoughts and given me useful tips to help me speak with more confidence.
Grace O., IE
It was really solid, very detailed, and it actually helped me make sense of a lot of things.
Carla T., TT
I was really impressed with the report. It was clear, thoughtful, and it reflected things I’ve been noticing about myself.
Jade H., US
The questions made me think deeply and helped me become more self-aware.
Brooke S., US
Reading through most of the questions made me feel understood. Although I’ve already worked through some of these issues, the questions still gave me useful insights and helped me learn more about myself.
Ryan M., US
I usually take one or two tests each month, and this has become a good way for me to see how I’m doing.
Lucas W., US
Most of the time, my results are in the 90 to 98th percentile compared to others. It really makes me feel like there’s something unique about me.
Ethan C., US
I tried out some of the AI’s suggestions, and to be honest, they worked much better than I thought they would. Maybe this thing really is smarter than me.
Reece D., AU
Trusted by 22k+ Users Worldwide
CLEAR ANSWERS TO COMMON QUESTIONS
Frequently Asked Questions

Any questions left?

What does this questionnaire measure?
It measures the quality of the working relationship between client and therapist. It covers agreement on goals, agreement on tasks, and the emotional bond.
Who should complete it?
There are separate forms for the client and the therapist. Each should complete the form independently.
How long does it take and how many items are included?
Completion typically takes about 2 minutes. The form contains 10 items.
When should it be used?
It may be used early in treatment, during ongoing work, or near termination. Repeated use can track changes in the working relationship over time.
How should results be interpreted?
Scores summarize perceived alliance strength, and client and therapist scores can be compared. Meaningful differences may indicate a need to clarify goals, tasks, or the relationship in session.
WHAT THE TEST MEASURES
About This Assessment
Psychotherapeutic Alliance Measurement Method, WAI-S Test

Working Alliance Inventory–Short Form (WAI-S) Test

This measure assesses the quality of the therapeutic working relationship across core alliance domains. The Working Alliance Inventory–Short Form (WAI-S) is designed to support brief, structured feedback on how well therapy is functioning from the perspective of the respondent.

It contains 10 items and typically takes about 2 minutes to complete. Parallel forms may be used with clients and clinicians to compare perceptions of agreement on goals and tasks and the perceived bond within treatment.

Developed by Leslie S. Greenberg, Adam O. Horvath, and Edward S. Bordin, the Working Alliance Inventory–Short Form (WAI-S) can be administered repeatedly during the course of therapy to monitor change over time and to identify potential discrepancies that may warrant clinical attention.

Author: Adam O. Horvath, Edward S. Bordin, Leslie S. Greenberg
Literature: Martin, D. J., Garske, J. P., & Davis, M. K. Relation of the therapeutic alliance with outcome and other variables: A meta-analytic review. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology. 2000.; Tracey, T. J., & Kokotovic, A. M. Factor structure of the Working Alliance Inventory. Psychological Assessment. 1989.; Horvath, A. O., & Greenberg, L. S. Development and validation of the Working Alliance Inventory. Journal of Counseling Psychology. 1989.
Test Question Form
Comments
Leave a Comment