Prices
Tests
FAQ
How sessions work
en
es
Log inSign up

Abnotivity Level Assessment Test

In 7 minutes, see how well you recognize and support gifted students, even when creativity looks unconventional. Get clear results from 36 questions to strengthen bias-aware coaching and nurture talent.
Start Online Test
Questions: 367 minutes
Hi! My name is Freudly, i am an AI therapist, I will give you an interpretation of the test after you complete it.
08:30
October 2, 2025
October 2, 2025
Material has been updated
17558 views
1535 completions
1349 likes
Share
Scale Explorer
How the Scales are Structured
example score
4/10
Abnotivity Level (A) (AL()
Measures abnotivity-related professional risk in educators, where higher scores indicate lower abnotivity and fewer destructive tendencies in work interactions.
Higher abnotivity
Moderate abnotivity
Lower abnotivity
0 – 3: Higher abnotivity | 4 – 7: Moderate abnotivity | 8 – 10: Lower abnotivity
A score of 4 falls in the Moderate abnotivity range, suggesting some risk of unhelpful professional reactions may appear in challenging interactions, but not consistently.
Start Online Test
just completed the test
DATA-BASED USER COHORTS
Who Usually Takes This Test?
School teachers of teens
41%OF USERS
Teachers in middle and high school who want to better notice unconventional talent and respond constructively to creative behavior in class.
Gifted program educators
34%OF USERS
Specialists running enrichment, олимпиад, or project-based tracks who need a clear view of how well they can support and develop gifted students.
School psychologists and counselors
25%OF USERS
Support staff who assess students’ creative potential and help teachers choose strategies that nurture motivation and reduce bias in evaluation.
BASED ON AGGREGATED, ANONYMIZED DATA FROM TENS OF THOUSANDS OF FREUDLY USERS.
RESULTS YOU CAN ACTUALLY USE
What You’ll See After You Finish the Test
Scale Results
— Explained Clearly
Your scores across each test scale, translated into plain, usable insights. Not just numbers, but what they actually mean for your daily life, emotional state, and overall well-being.
AI-Powered
Interpretation
A structured, clinically grounded explanation. Our AI analyzes patterns and relationships between scales to provide a coherent interpretation — without alarmist language.
Statistical
Comparison
See how you compare to others. Your scores are placed in a statistical context, showing percentiles and trends based on anonymized platform data to help you understand what`s typical.
Practical
Recommendations
Actionable guidance tailored to your profile. Receive clear, realistic suggestions you can apply immediately — focused on coping, self-regulation, and realistic next steps.
AI-Detected
Insights
Key patterns you might not notice on your own. Surfacing subtle connections in your responses that help you better understand what may be driving your current results.
Discuss with
an AI Psychologist
Clarify, reflect, and explore right away. Talk through your outcomes, ask questions, and explore meanings in a calm, non-diagnostic dialogue environment.
Start Online Test
Used in 52+ countries
Benchmarking
See How You Compare
Once you finish the test, your results will be compared with real-world data from people in your country.
Below is a preview of the benchmarks we use to place your score in context.
Level of Abnotivity (A) (LoA()
Average
4.8
Normal range
3 — 6.6
min.
0
max.
10
majority
This curve shows how scores are typically distributed.
Once you complete the test, your result will appear here so you can see where you land.
Start Online Test
Featured On
Rated 4.8/5 by Our Customers
“Freudly really helped me discover parts of my personality I hadn’t noticed before. It strengthened the areas where I needed to grow and made me feel more grounded and confident in the parts that already worked well.”
— Emma C., US
“I wanted to understand how serious my ADHD is, and now I finally do. I also realized I need to work on my self-esteem. It has been low for a long time, and that makes daily life harder than it should be.”
— Mateo R., CA
“Reading each question felt like someone really understood me. Even though I’ve already dealt with much of this, reflecting still helped me learn something new about myself.”
— Caroline F., US
“The process is simple. The test covers everything you need, and you’ll get a clear breakdown of your results. For just a few dollars, it’s a great value.”
— Klara N., CZ
“I kept thinking there might be a small chance, but now I know for sure. The questions were easy to understand, and the whole process was straightforward.”
— Bruno M., BR
“I really enjoyed this experience. I learned a lot, and it helped me make sense of my thoughts and the feeling I’ve had for a long time that I may have grown up with undiagnosed ADHD.”
— Alice B., FR
“Great platform — the insights were genuinely meaningful!”
— Daniel W., DE
“Everything was easy to follow. The tools you get at the end are genuinely helpful for self-growth, and the price is very reasonable. I really appreciate that.”
— Sofia M., ES
“Surprisingly accurate — honestly didn’t expect it to nail things so well.”
— Adir B., IL
“There are lots of different tests to pick from, and the price is surprisingly low for how much insight you get.”
— Olivia W., CA
“I was pleasantly surprised when I read the results. It was as if someone had sorted out my messy thoughts and given me useful tips to help me speak with more confidence.”
— Grace O., IE
“It was really solid, very detailed, and it actually helped me make sense of a lot of things.”
— Carla T., TT
“I was really impressed with the report. It was clear, thoughtful, and it reflected things I’ve been noticing about myself.”
— Jade H., US
“The questions made me think deeply and helped me become more self-aware.”
— Brooke S., US
“Reading through most of the questions made me feel understood. Although I’ve already worked through some of these issues, the questions still gave me useful insights and helped me learn more about myself.”
— Ryan M., US
“I usually take one or two tests each month, and this has become a good way for me to see how I’m doing.”
— Lucas W., US
“Most of the time, my results are in the 90 to 98th percentile compared to others. It really makes me feel like there’s something unique about me.”
— Ethan C., US
“I tried out some of the AI’s suggestions, and to be honest, they worked much better than I thought they would. Maybe this thing really is smarter than me.”
— Reece D., AU
Trusted by 22k+ Users Worldwide
CLEAR ANSWERS TO COMMON QUESTIONS
Frequently Asked Questions

Any questions left?

What does this assessment measure?
It measures professional readiness to notice creative potential, interpret it without bias, and provide appropriate educational and psychological support.
Who is this assessment intended for?
It is intended for educators and specialists who work with students and need to support giftedness and unconventional thinking.
How long does it take to complete and how many items are included?
Estimated completion time is about 7 minutes. The assessment includes 36 items.
What types of tasks are included?
Items reflect common situations that require recognizing, understanding, and responding to creative ideas and nonstandard behavior. Responses are used to estimate patterns of perception and support.
How should results be used?
Results indicate relative strengths and areas for development in supporting creative students. They should be used to guide training and reflective practice, not as a sole basis for personnel decisions.
WHAT THE TEST MEASURES
About This Assessment
Method for Determining the Level of Abnotivity Test

Abnotivity Level Assessment Test

pedagogy

This measure is intended to support structured appraisal of educators’ readiness to recognize and work effectively with creatively gifted students. The Abnotivity Level Assessment is used to examine professional capacities related to identifying nonstandard expressions of creative potential and responding in a supportive, developmentally appropriate manner.

The instrument consists of 36 items and typically requires about 7 minutes to complete. It is commonly applied in educational or training contexts to inform reflection on instructional approach and to guide professional development planning. Authors: A. T. Beck; A. Ellis.

Score interpretation from the Abnotivity Level Assessment should be integrated with relevant contextual information (e.g., teaching setting, role expectations, and observed classroom behavior) and should not be used as a stand-alone basis for high-stakes decisions.

Author: A. Ellis, A. T. Beck
Literature: Sternberg, R. J. Handbook of creativity. Cambridge University Press. 1999.; AERA, APA, & NCME. Standards for educational and psychological testing. American Educational Research Association. 2014.
Test Question Form
Comments
Leave a Comment