Prices
Tests
FAQ
How sessions work
en
es
Log inSign up

Comprehensive Assessment of Developmental Stages of Subjectivity Formation Test

See where you are in building self-awareness and responsibility in about 15 minutes. Ten questions give clear stage-based insights and practical next steps for education or HR.
Start Online Test
Questions: 1015 minutes
Hi! My name is Freudly, i am an AI therapist, I will give you an interpretation of the test after you complete it.
08:30
October 2, 2025
October 2, 2025
Material has been updated
16321 view
1400 completions
1217 likes
Share
Scale Explorer
How the Scales are Structured
example score
40/60
Creator (C)
Measures the extent to which a person applies mastered skills toward innovation, self-directed growth, and creating new solutions beyond existing boundaries.
Emerging creator
Developing creator
Advanced creator
10 – 26: Emerging creator | 27 – 43: Developing creator | 44 – 60: Advanced creator
A score of 40 falls in the Developing creator range, suggesting a growing tendency to pursue new approaches and link achievement with ongoing self-education and personal development.
example score
30/60
Expert (E)
Measures the capacity for objective evaluation of actions (one’s own and others’), including forecasting, identifying errors, and giving constructive guidance.
Developing expert evaluation
Emerging expert stance
Strong expert competence
10 – 26: Developing expert evaluation | 27 – 43: Emerging expert stance | 44 – 60: Strong expert competence
A score of 30 falls in the “Emerging expert stance” range, suggesting a growing ability to evaluate performance and offer useful feedback, with room to strengthen consistency and depth of judgment.
example score
52/60
Master (M)
Measures the degree of independent planning, self-control, error analysis, and responsible application of proven methods to achieve goals.
Developing mastery
Competent mastery
Advanced mastery
10 – 26: Developing mastery | 27 – 43: Competent mastery | 44 – 60: Advanced mastery
A score of 52 falls in the Advanced mastery range, indicating strong self-regulation, reliable execution control, and effective adjustment based on self-assessment.
example score
28/60
Learner (L)
Measures the extent to which a person learns and acts as a self-directed learner who can take on challenges with growing independence and reflection.
Needs structure
Developing autonomy
Self-directed learner
10 – 26: Needs structure | 27 – 43: Developing autonomy | 44 – 60: Self-directed learner
A score of 28 falls in the “Developing autonomy” range, suggesting emerging independence in learning and challenge-taking while still benefiting from guidance and feedback.
example score
48/60
Apprentice (A)
Measures the extent to which a person tends to learn by imitating established models and reproducing demonstrated actions rather than self-regulating based on deep understanding.
Low imitation reliance
Moderate model-following
High pattern replication
10 – 26: Low imitation reliance | 27 – 43: Moderate model-following | 44 – 60: High pattern replication
A score of 48 falls in the High pattern replication range, suggesting a strong preference for following proven examples closely, with independent regulation and rationale awareness still developing.
example score
32/60
Observer (O)
Measures the tendency to primarily observe and analyze situations and others’ actions rather than actively engage and apply new methods.
Low observer stance
Moderate observer stance
High observer stance
10 – 26: Low observer stance | 27 – 43: Moderate observer stance | 44 – 60: High observer stance
A score of 32 indicates a moderate observer stance, suggesting you often notice and reflect on what is happening but may not consistently move from observation to active experimentation with new approaches.
Start Online Test
just completed the test
DATA-BASED USER COHORTS
Who Usually Takes This Test?
Students in transition
41%OF USERS
High school, college, and early-career learners take it to understand their current stage of growth, responsibility, and readiness for challenges.
Educators and mentors
34%OF USERS
Teachers, tutors, and supervisors use the educator version to assess learners’ subjectivity stages and plan targeted support or development tasks.
HR and development leads
25%OF USERS
HR specialists, L&D managers, and coaches apply it in training or assessment to spot growth bottlenecks and guide professional development.
BASED ON AGGREGATED, ANONYMIZED DATA FROM TENS OF THOUSANDS OF FREUDLY USERS.
RESULTS YOU CAN ACTUALLY USE
What You’ll See After You Finish the Test
Scale Results
— Explained Clearly
Your scores across each test scale, translated into plain, usable insights. Not just numbers, but what they actually mean for your daily life, emotional state, and overall well-being.
AI-Powered
Interpretation
A structured, clinically grounded explanation. Our AI analyzes patterns and relationships between scales to provide a coherent interpretation — without alarmist language.
Statistical
Comparison
See how you compare to others. Your scores are placed in a statistical context, showing percentiles and trends based on anonymized platform data to help you understand what`s typical.
Practical
Recommendations
Actionable guidance tailored to your profile. Receive clear, realistic suggestions you can apply immediately — focused on coping, self-regulation, and realistic next steps.
AI-Detected
Insights
Key patterns you might not notice on your own. Surfacing subtle connections in your responses that help you better understand what may be driving your current results.
Discuss with
an AI Psychologist
Clarify, reflect, and explore right away. Talk through your outcomes, ask questions, and explore meanings in a calm, non-diagnostic dialogue environment.
Start Online Test
Used in 52+ countries
Benchmarking
See How You Compare
Once you finish the test, your results will be compared with real-world data from people in your country.
Below is a preview of the benchmarks we use to place your score in context.
Creator (C)
Average
30.7
Normal range
21.7 — 39.7
min.
10
max.
60
majority
This curve shows how scores are typically distributed.
Once you complete the test, your result will appear here so you can see where you land.
Expert (E)
Average
34.3
Normal range
26.3 — 42.3
min.
10
max.
60
majority
This curve shows how scores are typically distributed.
Once you complete the test, your result will appear here so you can see where you land.
Master (M)
Average
29.3
Normal range
22 — 36.6
min.
10
max.
60
majority
This curve shows how scores are typically distributed.
Once you complete the test, your result will appear here so you can see where you land.
Student (S)
Average
43.6
Normal range
34.8 — 52.5
min.
10
max.
60
majority
This curve shows how scores are typically distributed.
Once you complete the test, your result will appear here so you can see where you land.
Apprentice (A)
Average
45.4
Normal range
38.6 — 52.3
min.
10
max.
60
majority
This curve shows how scores are typically distributed.
Once you complete the test, your result will appear here so you can see where you land.
Observer (O)
Average
33.5
Normal range
25.1 — 41.9
min.
10
max.
60
majority
This curve shows how scores are typically distributed.
Once you complete the test, your result will appear here so you can see where you land.
Start Online Test
Featured On
Rated 4.8/5 by Our Customers
“Freudly really helped me discover parts of my personality I hadn’t noticed before. It strengthened the areas where I needed to grow and made me feel more grounded and confident in the parts that already worked well.”
— Emma C., US
“I wanted to understand how serious my ADHD is, and now I finally do. I also realized I need to work on my self-esteem. It has been low for a long time, and that makes daily life harder than it should be.”
— Mateo R., CA
“Reading each question felt like someone really understood me. Even though I’ve already dealt with much of this, reflecting still helped me learn something new about myself.”
— Caroline F., US
“The process is simple. The test covers everything you need, and you’ll get a clear breakdown of your results. For just a few dollars, it’s a great value.”
— Klara N., CZ
“I kept thinking there might be a small chance, but now I know for sure. The questions were easy to understand, and the whole process was straightforward.”
— Bruno M., BR
“I really enjoyed this experience. I learned a lot, and it helped me make sense of my thoughts and the feeling I’ve had for a long time that I may have grown up with undiagnosed ADHD.”
— Alice B., FR
“Great platform — the insights were genuinely meaningful!”
— Daniel W., DE
“Everything was easy to follow. The tools you get at the end are genuinely helpful for self-growth, and the price is very reasonable. I really appreciate that.”
— Sofia M., ES
“Surprisingly accurate — honestly didn’t expect it to nail things so well.”
— Adir B., IL
“There are lots of different tests to pick from, and the price is surprisingly low for how much insight you get.”
— Olivia W., CA
“I was pleasantly surprised when I read the results. It was as if someone had sorted out my messy thoughts and given me useful tips to help me speak with more confidence.”
— Grace O., IE
“It was really solid, very detailed, and it actually helped me make sense of a lot of things.”
— Carla T., TT
“I was really impressed with the report. It was clear, thoughtful, and it reflected things I’ve been noticing about myself.”
— Jade H., US
“The questions made me think deeply and helped me become more self-aware.”
— Brooke S., US
“Reading through most of the questions made me feel understood. Although I’ve already worked through some of these issues, the questions still gave me useful insights and helped me learn more about myself.”
— Ryan M., US
“I usually take one or two tests each month, and this has become a good way for me to see how I’m doing.”
— Lucas W., US
“Most of the time, my results are in the 90 to 98th percentile compared to others. It really makes me feel like there’s something unique about me.”
— Ethan C., US
“I tried out some of the AI’s suggestions, and to be honest, they worked much better than I thought they would. Maybe this thing really is smarter than me.”
— Reece D., AU
Trusted by 22k+ Users Worldwide
CLEAR ANSWERS TO COMMON QUESTIONS
Frequently Asked Questions

Any questions left?

What does this questionnaire measure?
It estimates the current stage of personal subjectivity formation, including awareness, self-regulation, and responsibility. Results are organized across six stages from Observer to Creator.
What are the six stages reported in the results?
The stages are Observer, Apprentice, Student, Master, Expert, and Creator. Each stage reflects typical ways of noticing, learning, applying skills, reflecting, and creating new approaches.
How long does it take and how many items are included?
Estimated completion time is about 15 minutes. The questionnaire includes 10 items.
Are there different versions, and how are they used?
Two versions are available: one for students and one for educators. This allows comparison between self-report and an external observer perspective to clarify developmental tasks.
How should the results be interpreted and used?
The output provides stage descriptions and practical recommendations rather than only scores. It can help identify transition difficulties between stages and guide training, coaching, or supervision plans.
WHAT THE TEST MEASURES
About This Assessment
Assessment of the Developmental Stages of Subjectivity Formation Test

Comprehensive Assessment of Developmental Stages of Subjectivity Formation Test

pedagogysubjectivity

This measure is designed to support a brief appraisal of developmental subjectivity, with attention to shifts in self-awareness and responsibility. The Assessment of the Developmental Stages of Subjectivity Formation is administered as a self-report questionnaire and can be used in educational or organizational contexts as an initial screening of perceived developmental position. It contains 10 items and typically requires about 15 minutes to complete.

Content is organized around a staged framework of subjectivity formation, progressing from basic self-observation to increasingly autonomous, reflective, and generative functioning. Results are intended to be interpreted descriptively to inform individualized goal-setting and to identify potential areas of developmental stagnation or transition. In some settings, the Assessment of the Developmental Stages of Subjectivity Formation may be complemented by an external informant perspective (e.g., educator ratings) to compare self-perceptions with observer impressions; authorship is attributed to Erik H. Erikson and Lawrence Kohlberg.

Author: Erik H. Erikson, Lawrence Kohlberg
Literature: Bandura, A. Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Prentice-Hall. 1986.
Test Question Form
Comments
Leave a Comment